[balrog666]

We have some set of events that occurred, most of which are not in dispute, yet the origin/genesis of the process appears unknown but not unknowable.

Why don't you just pursue your quest with those who were in a position to know the answers?

Or are you incapable of figuring out who they might be?

[darbymcgill]

Why don't you just pursue your quest with those who were in a position to know the answers?

Because it doesn't matter, and I could care less.

My point is that those on these threads that call people names, tin foil hatters, psychos, etc. expecting us to believe the only way someone gets banned is by being abusive.

Being abusive alone will not necessarily get you banned. It's obvious that is not the case or there would only be a handful of posters left on these threads anyway.

There is an extremely remote possibility that the mods may be randomly monitoring some threads and notice random abuse and take action. But you know, I know and most everyone else knows that someone must notify the mods that there is an abuser present. When that happens, the person making the complaint and the mod/s are "conspiring", "working as a team", "planning", "negotiating", call it what you will to have the abuse stop.

It is my contention that whenever someone gets banned, not withstanding their posts, it's because a complaint was lodged and more importantly more than once...

If you guys want to continue to abuse those who understand the process, you do so at the peril of your cred...