Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global warming study: polar ice sheets could start to melt this century
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 1/30/06 | AFP

Posted on 01/30/2006 4:02:45 PM PST by NormsRevenge

LONDON (AFP) - Global warming could cause ice at both poles of the Earth to start melting this century, driving up sea levels, according to a major study published by the British government.

The study, "Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change", collates evidence presented by scientists at a conference staged a year ago ahead of the 2005 Group of Eight (G8) summit, where Britain placed global warming high on the agenda.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair added his voice to the warning on Monday.

"It is clear from the work presented that the risks of climate change may well be greater than we thought," Blair said in the study's foreword.

"It is now plain that the emission of greenhouse gases, associated with industrialization and economic growth from a world population that has increased six-fold in 200 years, is causing global warming at a rate that is unsustainable."

The consensus view among scientists, the document warned, is of large-scale and irreversible disruption to the planet's climate system if temperatures rise by more than 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 Fahrenheit) above current levels.

Such a rise is well within the range of climate change projections for the century, it said, warning: "In many cases the risks are more serious than previously thought."

The international conference, which took place in Exeter, southwest England, was the biggest gathering of climate scientists since a landmark report in 2001 published under UN auspices.

That report confirmed that temperatures were rising and pinned the blame on carbon emissions disgorged mainly by the burning of oil, gas and coal.

It said that future greenhouse gas emissions were likely to raise global temperatures by between 1.4 and 5.8 degrees Celsius (2.5 and 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit) from 1990 to 2100. The temperature has already risen about 0.6 Celsius (1.6 Fahrenheit) since 1900.

But the UN report also acknowledged some uncertainties as to when, where and how this pollution would affect the climate.

The latest study says that some of the knowledge gap has been filled.

Compared with the UN report, it said, there "is greater clarity and reduced uncertainty" about the impacts of climate change across a wide range of systems, sectors and societies.

There is a serious risk of large-scale, irreversible system disruption, including the possible destabilisation of the Antarctic ice sheets if the warming goes beyond 3 Celsius (5.4 Fahrenheit) above current levels, the report warned.

A regional increase of 2.7 Celsius (4.9 Fahrenheit) above present levels could trigger melting of the Greenland ice cap, it said.

It said increasing acidity in the ocean would be likely to reduce the capacity to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and affect the entire marine food chain.

Even a more modest rise in global temperatures of about 1 Celsius (1.8 Fahrenheit) would probably lead to extensive coral bleaching, the report said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: century; climatechange; globalwarming; icesheets; melt; polar; study
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2006 4:02:45 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

and we're STILL re-building New Orleans?


2 posted on 01/30/2006 4:04:15 PM PST by C210N (Bush SPYED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"since a landmark report in 2001 published under UN auspices. That report confirmed that temperatures were rising and pinned the blame on carbon emissions disgorged mainly by the burning of oil, gas and coal."

That report contains the utterly debunked "hockey stick" graph.


3 posted on 01/30/2006 4:05:47 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

When Blair and his dumbnut scientists invest all their money into a houseboat manufacturer, then I'll pay attention.


4 posted on 01/30/2006 4:05:53 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N
In the San Francisco paper today there is a front page article on building out in the San Joaquin Valley; one tract was 5000 homes - 6 feet BELOW sea level.
5 posted on 01/30/2006 4:06:25 PM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C210N

If only, if only ... that darn Alito vote was prevented today, all this wouldn't happen ....... /sarc off


6 posted on 01/30/2006 4:06:36 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Where's Leonard Nemoy when we need him?


7 posted on 01/30/2006 4:06:54 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Could? I thought they already were... lol


8 posted on 01/30/2006 4:07:26 PM PST by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Haven't the enviroTerrorists been saying the ice is already largely melted? Why does the story keep changing?


9 posted on 01/30/2006 4:10:09 PM PST by noblejones (Ben Stein for President, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I thought ice coverage was increasing in the Antartic


10 posted on 01/30/2006 4:11:08 PM PST by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
Didn't we learn last August/September why we shouldn't build housing below sea level? This is ridiculous! Why can't we build homes in any of the various "green space" in the San Francisco area? Why should we destroy precious wetlands so that we might live in a swamp until next it rains, when we shall drown?
11 posted on 01/30/2006 4:15:17 PM PST by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

http://www.iceagenow.com/India_Net_Daily_Editorial.htm


12 posted on 01/30/2006 4:17:26 PM PST by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And Kyoto, if fully implemented, signed by the US and kept in place for the next 94 years would reduce global temperatures by 4/100ths of a degree.

.04 of a degree.

And that's assuming the models are correct.


13 posted on 01/30/2006 4:17:35 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"It is clear from the work presented that the risks of climate change may well be greater than we thought," Blair said in the study's foreword.

What comment is necessary? You see it.

14 posted on 01/30/2006 4:18:39 PM PST by Lester Moore (The headwaters of the islamic river of death and hate are in Saudi Arabia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The forsythia bushes are blooming in East Tennessee...

Global warming is awful, awful I tell you.


15 posted on 01/30/2006 4:18:50 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

"I thought ice coverage was increasing in the Antartic"

Whenever you hear "glacier are decreasing in X" question whether they're increasing in "Y".


16 posted on 01/30/2006 4:19:33 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: noblejones; spanalot

Badly written article, similar to the 'science' employed.

In one paragraph the writer refers to polar ice sheets, in another only to Greenland, and in yet another to both polar regions.

Yes, it is true that the ice caps on Greenland and on Antartica are thickening at a fairly rapid pace. IMHO, that is what is causing glaciers in Antartica to accelerate to the sea, and breaking up the attendant sea ice sheets in the process.


17 posted on 01/30/2006 4:19:40 PM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

build build build

developers and major contributors (to the Gub) are chomping at the bit to build out there.

it may explain why the Gub fired a bunch of folks on the state levees commission right before releasing a study that has yet to be released, coincidence?


18 posted on 01/30/2006 4:20:04 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I can't wait to see this!

The sky is falling, the sky is falling!


19 posted on 01/30/2006 4:21:10 PM PST by standing united (82nd ABN 1/508th BN Bco 1st Sqd. Alpha Fireteam Leader: "fury from the sky" 8-Duce on the Loose!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I hear ya,, anyone can commission a study these days and make nebulous claims and ignore other studies that invalidate their own.


20 posted on 01/30/2006 4:21:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson