To: C210N
In the San Francisco paper today there is a front page article on building out in the San Joaquin Valley; one tract was 5000 homes - 6 feet BELOW sea level.
To: SF Republican
Didn't we learn last August/September why we shouldn't build housing below sea level? This is ridiculous! Why can't we build homes in any of the various "green space" in the San Francisco area? Why should we destroy precious wetlands so that we might live in a swamp until next it rains, when we shall drown?
11 posted on
01/30/2006 4:15:17 PM PST by
dufekin
(US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
To: SF Republican
build build build
developers and major contributors (to the Gub) are chomping at the bit to build out there.
it may explain why the Gub fired a bunch of folks on the state levees commission right before releasing a study that has yet to be released, coincidence?
18 posted on
01/30/2006 4:20:04 PM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SF Republican
San Joaquin Valley; one tract was 5000 homes - 6 feet BELOW sea level. That can't end well.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson