Posted on 01/30/2006 12:50:09 PM PST by ChuckShick
Mon Jan 30, 11:37 AM ET
(PRWEB) - Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.
They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.
These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."
They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
They are delusional HOWEVER THE REST OF THE WORLD REPORTS THESE STORIES AS 100% TRUE AND ACCURATE!
The rest of the world does not use the internet.
The rest of the world still relyies on newspapers. Many of those "international papers" are owned by the same company as the NYT and they simply translate stories.
The rest of the world believes michael moore, and barbara streisand, and that french lunatic author. There is no rush limbaugh, no new media, no fox news comentators, they have no ann coulter. The rest of the world is trapped in 1970's ignorance pandering media selling only Chairman comrade walter cronkite left wing lies about the USA with field reporter Jimmy "USA IS BAD" Carter.
So 9/11 is the beginning of the Foundation Trilogy?
LOL. Well, they got the psycho part right.
Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings.
At what other speed would buildings be expected to fall? Can they point to any building collapse anywhere, from any cause, that didn't feature a "near-gravity speed of fall"? And considering that the falls were precipitated by structural damage on just a couple of floors, followed by tremendous heat-generating fires that quickly spread ACROSS those floors, I can' imagine what direction they could have fallen in other than straight down. And thank God they fell straight down rather than toppling over -- if they'd toppled over, the death toll would have been at least 10 times higher than it was.
so he is a believer of history belongs to those who write it.
So the left is writing as much as possible to build a record based on lies.
All I hear is a bunch of WONKS!!!!!!!! A LOT of students in there too. Remember, this is being pushed from one of the biggest welfare state colleges. *wonk wonk wonk*
Anyone want to take a stab at debunking these? I will later on if no one wants to. My dad(s) were both livelong firefighters, and I know more about structures and fire than most people... but if we've got some structural engineers out here! :D
Okay, not that "distnguished" psych majors would understand this, but:
(a) The buildings were designed to withstand the accidental impact of the largest plane IN 1968. The ones that actually hit it were at least DOUBLE that size. (Of course, emphasis should be placed on "accidental," as nobody in that era even considered the use of airlines as political or terrorist targets, as the "palestinians" had not invented that atrocity yet.)
(b) The original engineers have confirmed that no account was ever taken into the consideration that FULLY FUELLED TRANS-CONTINENTAL AIRLINES (which, as you'll recall, were an order of magnitude larger than the originally-accounted-for aircraft) would impact the buildings, and the subsequent ignition of such a large amount of JP fuel was never considered.
These twits need to stick to teaching 19-year-old morons (... "Freshmen"). They are clearly not suited to life amongst the rest of us.
He just went home. Watch the documentary "Men in Black" (about Agnet J and Agent K) for confirmation.
A University of Minnesota professor grabs headlines with his silly theories on 9/11. How is this possible?
A man with a PhD cannot comprehend the difference between a building that catches fire and a bulding that loses half of its upper level support while engulfed in thousands of gallons of liquid jet fuel. How is this possible?
A group of "experts" cannot come to the same conclusion that superheated steel will bend and sag, greatly compromising the structural integrity of a building. Instead they dismiss such an idea because it wasn't hot enough to actually MELT the steel. How is this possible?
An idiotic university professor of philosophy is passing himself off as an intelligence expert, engineer, chemist, and airline pilot, yet he seems oblivious to the fact that we are all laughing our asses off at him. how is that possible?
Building 7 had to go. It contained all the control room equipment and data used to pull off The Great 9/11 Caper. From there, "they" were able to orchestrate the entire day. Only after their mission was complete, did they abandon the building and set the last detonators on their way out the back door. It's true! Seriesly.
They must think the administration is pretty smart and efficient if they think that Bush could have implemented such a conspiracy in a mere 9 months....
That building didn't collapse. It was just gutted. It still stands today, and is known as the Brown Building at NYU.
Experts? Huh? Who the hell are they? Shouldn't I have heard of at least one of them before now?
I consider Wayne Madsen a savvy guy and way ahead of the pack. He predicted a Bush attack on Iran just before the last Presidential election. The Bushies found out that Wayne was tipped off and canceled the operation. The Bushies decided to just steal the election instead.
Read Wayne's story below - Tom
A Bush pre-election strike on Iran 'imminent' www.lebanwire.com ^ | October 20, 2004 | Wayne Madsen
According to White House and Washington Beltway insiders, the Bush administration, worried that it could lose the presidential election to Senator John F. Kerry, has initiated plans to launch a military strike on Iran's top Islamic leadership, its nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, and key nuclear targets throughout the country, including the main underground research site at Natanz in central Iran and another in Isfahan. Targets of the planned U.S. attack reportedly include mosques in Tehran, Qom, and Isfahan known by the U.S. to headquarter Iran's top mullahs.
The Iran attack plan was reportedly drawn up after internal polling indicated that if the Bush administration launched a so-called anti-terrorist attack on Iran some two weeks before the election, Bush would be assured of a landslide win against Kerry.
No doubt because the university has made clear to him that he will no longer BE a university professor if he uses the university's name in connection with any of this idiocy.
LOL.
A classic movie.
No kidding. On the one hand, Bush is so dumb he can't tie his shoes. Yet on the other hand, he is a brilliantly mad genius who duped the world into going to war, steered Hurricane Katrina to New Orleans in order to remove blacks from a state that voted for him twice, and make a killing off the oil futures market by destablizing the middle east.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.