Evidence That 2004 Election Was Stolen

NewsMax.com ^ | Jan. 20, 2006 | Paul Craig Roberts

[expat_panama]

"...protectionists are notoriously bad at math."

There's a million kinds of people in the world.  Those that throw crazy numbers around and those that don't.

[Toddsterpatriot]

I wonder if my favorite math major would get the joke?

[conservativecorner]

My point was and is that there were plenty of irregularities on the demoncrat side, and they were more serious than exit polling that nobody uses because it's not accurate. Look no further than 2000 when the alphabet networks learned that lesson.

[toddlintown]

I knew they were nuts over there, but not THAT nuts!

[Always Right]

The chances of exit polls in five states being wrong are no more than one in a million. (OMG, what a stupid thing to say!!) Miller describes considerably more election fraud than voting machines programmed to count a proportion of Kerry votes as Bush votes.

I love how these moonbats just simply assume that there is no chance of fraud and manipulation in exit polls which have no checks and balances, but all the fraud is in the real polls which are closely watched and have numerous checks and balances.

[FredZarguna]

If that was and is your point, you'd be well advised to leave out this sentence in the future:

And why no mention of the state of Pennsylvania where the city of Philadelphia was clearly using voter fraud so that Kerry would carry the state?

Kerry carried PA because we got our @sses kicked in "Republican" suburbs. I'm very happy for the Dems to think they've lost because of Diebold machines, voter fraud, etc etc. It keeps them from changing their message, which is the real problem. We shouldn't make the same mistake. It might be reassuring to believe we lost PA because of a few thousand votes on voting machines in Philly, but we didn't. It's foolish to claim we did.

[KC_Conspirator]

Paul Craig Roberts is a hack. No better than a DU nutbar. There is not a shred, not a single shred of evidence or fact that the GOP "stole" the election. There is however, documented evidence of democrat dirty tricks and vote fraud throughout the country.

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is not a shred, not a single shred of evidence or fact that the GOP "stole" the election. There is however, documented evidence of democrat dirty tricks and vote fraud throughout the country.

Exactly. Bush would have won New Mexico in 2000 and Wisconsin in 2000 and 2004 if Dem fraud had been prevented.

[yarddog]

My how times have changed. I grew up in Defuniak spgs. When I was a kid there was only one party, the democrats. Whoever won the Democratic primary was the automatic winner.

No one even showed up to vote in the general election. A couple of times someone would try to steal an election by having a bunch of people show up and write in a candidate since it would have only taken a few dozen to change the outcome.

Now it is solidly Republican. I haven't subscribed to the Defuniak Herald and Breeze Combined in maybe thirty years. I wonder if they have dropped the "Breeze" portion of the title? Any way all it was was local events and who visited who for the weekend etc. Guess I won't subscribe again.

[dead]

Thanks for that link. It's like the Mad Hatter's Tea Party in there, only madder.

[Shooter1001]

Assuming for a moment this is true and we stole the 2000 election as well, we have to steal five or six more presidential elections just to break even!

Remember Chicago in 1960? The wise guys delivered and got Bobby Kennedy in return. Bang Bang Bang!

[gridlock]

AMENDMENT XXII Passed by Congress March 21, 1947. Ratified February 27, 1951.

Section 1.
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Cool. Bush/Cheney '08! How could the Donks object?

[SuziQ]

Just when did Paul Craig Roberts lose his mind?

[TASMANIANRED]

We have to cheat smarter than them with all the Democrat dead voting.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Could have been as early as 1982. His symptoms got worse in 2001 after President Bush took office.

[conservativecorner]

History clearly shows that demoncrats have on various occasions stolen elections, and 1960 is a classic example. There are plenty of articles out there, but you have to read them.

[tiki]

In the precinct where I was a watcher only 1 Republican voted on election day. They all voted early and Republican turnout was huge.

[tiki]

That's why they'll continue to lose elections. They blame it on fraud and not on their own positions.

[hosepipe]

He may be correct.. except he got it reversed..

Any that would vote for Al Gore or John sKerry would be nut jobs.. A proper count would/should have them both with much less votes..

In 2008 the democrat voter fraud may be even more "refined"..
You know, the "bugs" fixed..

Because republicans seem to care less about all that..