1 posted on
01/30/2006 12:09:52 AM PST by
Lorianne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Lorianne
in his text he writes a line that 'proves' Democrats believe even the highest courts are part of the political process:
" ... the party that has lost the White House, both houses of Congress, and now the courts ..."
'the party that has lost ... the courts.'
Political parties <--> courts. Only a Democrat sees them as aligned.
33 posted on
01/30/2006 3:28:55 AM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: Lorianne
34 posted on
01/30/2006 3:31:08 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Lorianne
...the pathetic and apparently surprising inability of 45 Democratic senators to stop 55 Republicans from approving anyone they want...Maybe you should ask President Kerry for help on this one.
35 posted on
01/30/2006 3:41:19 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Lorianne
And then there is election of 2000. We can argue forever (and will) about who won that election, but if the question is whose views attracted more voters, there is no dispute that the answer is the Democrats. Attributing 2000 to the Democrats means they have won two of the past three elections, three of the past four, and a non-apocalyptic three of the magic seven. but if the question is whose views attracted more voters, there is no dispute that the answer is the Democrats
This guy DOES NOT get it at all. Still bitter about 2000 and actually thinks the RATs attracted more voters. Their views probably attracted more voter, but those views made more people vote for Republicans.
37 posted on
01/30/2006 3:53:07 AM PST by
Arrowhead1952
(I never got a job from a person on a government program.)
To: Lorianne
surprising inability of 45 Democratic senators to stop 55 Republicans Gee, I knew Democrats were dumb, but I thought they at least knew that 45 is smaller than 55.
38 posted on
01/30/2006 3:58:12 AM PST by
libertylover
(Bush spied. Terrorists died.)
To: Miss Marple
You won't believe this one.
39 posted on
01/30/2006 4:00:29 AM PST by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: Lorianne
I have NEVER seen a more clueless bunch of losers
than this charade of MSM/dems...
41 posted on
01/30/2006 4:04:31 AM PST by
sirchtruth
(Words Mean Things...)
To: Lorianne
Boo
42 posted on
01/30/2006 4:07:05 AM PST by
ExGeeEye
To: Lorianne
Frickin'
43 posted on
01/30/2006 4:07:08 AM PST by
ExGeeEye
To: Lorianne
Hoo.
44 posted on
01/30/2006 4:07:12 AM PST by
ExGeeEye
(Fie.)
To: Lorianne
Democrats represent no one who is not actually waiting in line for a latte at a Starbucks within 150 yards of the east or west coastline. They are mired in trivial lifestyle issues like, oh, abortion and gay rights and Americans killing and dying in Iraq, while the Republicans serve up meat and potatoes for real Americans... If one reads Mr Kinsley without the bitter veil of sarcasm, he almost has it right, by golly.
46 posted on
01/30/2006 4:48:40 AM PST by
Sender
(As water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions. -Sun Tzu)
To: Lorianne
It seems to be time once again to play Kick the Democrats. Nuff said, where do I get in line?
To: Lorianne
When Democrats lose elections, it is because they have lost their principles and lost their way. I'll make Kinsley a deal... I'll bother to read the rest of this tripe if he can clearly lay out what the Democrats' "principles" are, and point me to any prominent Democrat (laughingstocks like Rangle or McKinney really don't count) publicly promoting a platform based on such "principles".
51 posted on
01/30/2006 5:26:03 AM PST by
kevkrom
("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
To: Lorianne
It's because they spend SO much effort trying to counter the horrible 'Right-wing Agenda'. By lying their asses off.
To: Lorianne
"They are mired in trivial lifestyle issues like, oh, abortion and gay rights and Americans killing and dying in Iraq, while the Republicans serve up meat and potatoes for real Americans, like privatizing Social Security ... ."
If you can not phrase the question correctly, you can not arrive at a correct answer.
The Democtrats stand for abortion on demand for any reason at any time. The American voters are begining to understand just what that really means, and are rejecting it, and with it, the Democrats that support that view.
The Democrats want to pull out of Iraq, and end the "war on terror", as if that is a real option. The American people understand that this war is not one of our making, and ending it before we win will just mean more Americans will die in this country.
The Democrats oppose any Social Security reform simply because a Republican proposes the reform. They know, as most Americans know, that Social Security as it stands today is broken, and if not changed will result in a bigger mess later.
So the Democrats know what concerns Americans, but have choosen to be on the opposite side of most voters on this issue. Unless they can convince the voters that they (the voters) are wrong, and they (the Democrats) are correct, they will continue to lose elections.
To: Lorianne
seems to have made the game suddenly a lot more popular Naaaaaaa ... it's just more fun
55 posted on
01/30/2006 5:31:17 AM PST by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: Lorianne
58 posted on
01/30/2006 5:33:36 AM PST by
Psycho_Bunny
(Libertarians are Anarchists who bathe.)
To: Lorianne
Kinslips is walking proof that you don't need talent to have a job in the Stone Age Press.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
61 posted on
01/30/2006 5:38:10 AM PST by
bray
(President Bush Protects America. The Rats Protect Terrorists.)
To: Lorianne
Where do I get in line to kick Michael Kinsley? Do you think anyone would notice if I went back to the end of the line 4 or 5 hundred times afterwards? Can I continue to kick him while he's down?
Mark
62 posted on
01/30/2006 5:40:52 AM PST by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: Lorianne
NO...NO...NO!!!!
Democrates lose elections because STATE TROOPERS with GUARD DOGS and WATER CANNON keep environmental activists, minority voters and womyn away from polling stations AT GUN POINT so that DIEBOLT won't even have to steal their votes!!!!
65 posted on
01/30/2006 5:51:22 AM PST by
martin gibson
(I know not what course others may take, but as for myself, give me Ralph Stanley or give me death!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson