Skip to comments.
U.S. Brings Back the .45
Strategy Page ^
 | January 27, 2006
Posted on 01/29/2006 11:14:04 AM PST by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 next  last
To: Eaker; glock rocks; Euro-American Scum; Squantos; humblegunner
    I have more faith in GLOCK than in Springfield's M1 Garand.  Ya, he's pretty reliable, most of the time...
 
To: bad company
    Based on articles by police and military in cold climates who learned that many layers of clothing can reduce the effectivness of 9mm rounds. Sorry you think it's idiotic, but apparently it's concern enough that many departments have chosen to go with pistols in .40 and .45 for that reason alone.
 
342
posted on 
01/29/2006 6:59:17 PM PST
by 
xander
 
To: xander
    I think you have a valid point but you have it backwards. A FMJ 9mm will penetrate thick clothing better than a .45 or .40.
I have even heard that is one of the reasons the Germans kept the 9mm instead of going to a larger caliber. A lot of their fighting was done in winter conditions and the 9 would go right through several layers of heavy clothing.
 
343
posted on 
01/29/2006 7:04:53 PM PST
by 
yarddog
 
To: endthematrix
    SOCOM authorized the Mark 23 as an offensive pistol back in the 90's. The only difference between it and the USP tactical is the barrel length (1" longer) and the reverse threading on the barrel.
 
344
posted on 
01/29/2006 7:08:24 PM PST
by 
jess35
 
To: Pete-R-Bilt; Eaker; Euro-American Scum; Squantos; humblegunner
      I have more faith in GLOCK than in Springfield's M1 Garand. Ya, he's pretty reliable, most of the time... 
  
   
      | 
    
       I aim to please :o)  
     | 
   
  
 
345
posted on 
01/29/2006 7:10:35 PM PST
by 
glock rocks
(Real engineers don't answer "why" questions.)
 
To: Squantos
    Excellent points Squantos.
For what it's worth as I type this a G21 with a streamlight M3 rail light is sitting on the desk next to me...
 LOL. I've got a SIG in .40 with an E2e resting next to it on the desk. BTW, did you get a chance to toy with the granite SIG yet?
 
346
posted on 
01/29/2006 7:21:54 PM PST
by 
glock rocks
(Real engineers don't answer "why" questions.)
 
To: 76834
    Use .45 rounds in an MP5 style weapon.
 
To: John Lenin
    Accuarcy is not an issue if you can't hit what you are shooting at because of stuff in the way. It is the same argument with the 5.56 shells.
 
To: Euro-American Scum
    The XM-8 is dead. So is the 6.8mm SPC. 
 
My source is well connected and has provided reliable information in the past.
 
349
posted on 
01/29/2006 8:18:44 PM PST
by 
IGOTMINE
(Front Sight.  Press.  Follow Through.  It's a way of life.)
 
To: yarddog
    
 Mateba
 
350
posted on 
01/29/2006 8:28:43 PM PST
by 
Shooter 2.5
(Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
 
To: Paul_Denton
    Then we should fill in the hollow point with pig lard and cap it off with thin copper. ;)
 
351
posted on 
01/29/2006 8:38:00 PM PST
by 
BigCinBigD
(Merry Christmas!)
 
To: Rodney King
    Kustom Karry only way to go...a true accurate rapid fire "combat" handgun - try squeezin' off rounds with a Schlock as fast a you can a 1911 frame - it takes forever...btw the Fairfax County cops accidentially killed a suspect last week - bet (maybe a bad choice of words the guy was wanted for gambling charges) the inquiry will reveal a Schlock went off "inadvertently"...
 
To: BigCinBigD; fallujah-nuker
    "Then we should fill in the hollow point with pig lard and cap it off with thin copper. ;)" 
 
Heh heh heh! I like it! Too bad the UN pansies would nail us for using Geneva Convention banned "deforming" and "poisoned" ammunition. Though I personnally think it doesn't count when you're fighting "unlawful combatants".
 
353
posted on 
01/29/2006 8:45:47 PM PST
by 
neutronsgalore
(Waffling George has failed to secure the borders...now it's Bouncing Betty's turn!)
 
To: Squantos
    Now if they make that USP 40 in 45, that'd be a hell of a combat pistol.
 L
 
354
posted on 
01/29/2006 8:56:05 PM PST
by 
Lurker
(I trust in God. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
 
To: Lurker
355
posted on 
01/29/2006 9:10:52 PM PST
by 
jess35
 
To: jess35
    Thanks. I didn't know they were making one.
 Mostly cause I didn't look for it. Now that I know they make one, I'm gonna have to add it to my 'must purchase' list which is already waaaaaaay tooooo long.
 Somehow I don't think I'll be able to slip this one past Lurker Control.
 L
 
356
posted on 
01/29/2006 9:24:21 PM PST
by 
Lurker
(I trust in God. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
 
To: Lurker
    Somehow I don't think I'll be able to slip this one past Lurker Control. Mr Jess35's trick is to say he's buying his latest firearm for me. That backfired on him when he brought a Kel-Tec SU16C home and I thanked him for it before putting it in my safe.
 
357
posted on 
01/29/2006 9:31:02 PM PST
by 
jess35
 
To: 76834
    Not sure why you seem to prefer the M1A1 Thompson to the M1928 with a Cutts compensator to help keep it down.... Have you ever spent much time on a range with a Thompson? They're not easy to be accurate with, and they really tend to climb, especially if you try to fire more than 3 round bursts. Takes a very delicate touch. And heavy? And the 50 round drums tend to jam....
 
358
posted on 
01/29/2006 9:36:09 PM PST
by 
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam  -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
 
To: xander
    Based on articles by police and military in cold climates who learned that many layers of clothing can reduce the effectivness of 9mm rounds Penetration is the advantage that 9mm brings to the table. Some gurus believe it brings too much.
many departments have chosen to go with pistols in .40 and .45 for that reason alone.
 Which departments are going with the .45?
 
359
posted on 
01/29/2006 10:02:02 PM PST
by 
bad company
(A foolproof plan fails to take in to account the Ingenuity of fools.)
 
To: ghostcat
    That explains so very much. My 1911 is a tack driver, and was so directly out of the box. It's an Auto Ordnance .45
  
 I shot pistols for my unit when I was in the infantry. We didn't have a budget for anything that wasn't in the armory, so we literally took every .45 in the unit out to the range to see which ones would shoot straightest.
  
 Also, for what it's worth, I was a medic and for a few years worked in ERs in and out of the service. I've seen people killed with everything, except maybe a .22 short. Not combat, of course, but everyone I've ever seen who'd been shot with a .45 was dead on their way to the ground.
  
 I'm sure others have had similar experiences, but I'm not a technician and just know what I've seen. If I were to guess, I'd say bullet placement is Job One, but when you don't have time for a nice leisurely target shoot a .45 seems to work best.
  
 I carry a .380 concealed because I just don't have enough ass to carry a .45 all day long. It is also a 1911 clone because I'm too old to learn how to shoot anything else, and after thirty plus years of practice I can pretty much draw, fire, and hit center of mass under any conditions.
360
posted on 
01/29/2006 10:03:54 PM PST
by 
Brucifer
(JF'n Kerry- "That's not just a paper cut, it's a Purple Heart!")
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson