Judge Greer looked at everything. He gave more weight to evidence he had reason to believe was credible and he gave less weight to evidence he had reason to believe was not credible.
I reviewed the record with an open mind, and I am convinced, beyond any doubt, that he blew it as a matter of law, and as a matter of construing evidence.
The civil law process being what it is, once found wrong, error is very difficult to reverse. Civil law is ill equipped to handle matters where life itself is the subject of the remedy sought in court.
Who can win an argument in a court before a judge who abuses logic and common sense?
Illogical Greer accepted Jay Wolfson's illogic that an inverse statement (B) "I don't think, therefore, I am not," follows logically from the statement (A), "I think, therefore, I am."
Elementary logic shows Wolfson is wrong to make an assumption that an inverse statement is true
Screwy things that the "Kill-Terri" hordes have said and done
1. Ed Koch thinks Terri needs to watch TV to know she is starving.
2. George Felos thinks Terri looks "beautiful" after her week of forced starvation.
3. Doctor Cranford, who helped Michael win Terri's "right to die" does not believe Terri has constitutional rights
4. Terri said "No tubes for me, " but Michael ignored Terri's "wishes" and had a tube inserted
Elementary Illogic
A Primer
by George Greer
With a forward by Jay Wolfson
...and the fact remains that no court looked at the evidence with a fresh outlook on it. They only looked at the evidence in the eyes of one judge. That is by the way what the congress asked of the judges, if they would have a fresh review of the facts in the case. They would do it for the worst of criminals but not her.