Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ContraryMary
Judge Greer looked at everything. He gave more weight to evidence he had reason to believe was credible and he gave less weight to evidence he had reason to believe was not credible.

...and the fact remains that no court looked at the evidence with a fresh outlook on it. They only looked at the evidence in the eyes of one judge. That is by the way what the congress asked of the judges, if they would have a fresh review of the facts in the case. They would do it for the worst of criminals but not her.

340 posted on 01/30/2006 6:23:36 AM PST by mware (The keeper of the I's once again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: mware

because she was not a criminal. she was simply a chest of drawers willed to someone who wanted to turn it into firewood.


342 posted on 01/30/2006 6:27:59 AM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]

To: mware
They only looked at the evidence in the eyes of one judge.

They only looked at the evidence in the eyes of one judge, who happened to be legally blind.

344 posted on 01/30/2006 7:20:13 AM PST by syriacus (For my punishment, I must write "I am a Terri-bot, who resorts to histrionics" 100 times. I am a Ter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson