Poll: Weak Ratings Confront Bush Ahead of State of Union

"Who fixed what and where did they vote. Where did the NWO vote?"

You won't find that kind of info in your local newspaper, will you?

Call it what you want -- the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the Bilderbergers, the Skull and Bones -- the world's elites.

Maybe you would care to explain the un-explainable....

Like how Bubba Clinton inexplicably beat 1001 reasons for impeachment?

How GH Bush obviously ran a campaign to lose it.

How Perot came out of NO WHERE to garnish nearly 20% of the popular vote?

How NO GOP CANDIDATE publically mentioned ANY of the 1001 reasons why not to vote for Bubba either time?

September 11, 1990

"We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a new world order -- can emerge: a new era -- freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice."

~ George H. Bush ~

Maybe you would care to explain the un-explainable....

That would require proof by logical deduction and observance and could be refuted by the same logical deduction and observance. Lacking any facts or empirical evidence at best, it could only be philosophy and argued by logical deduction. A argument that is not supported by logical deduction and observance is then but a opinion by a opinionest who would seek to impose views asserting that if something is not known then it must be what the opinionest thinks. Most conspiracies are more opinion than fact and yours is no different.

"Lacking any facts or empirical evidence at best, it could only be philosophy and argued by logical deduction.

Ok, Professor, try "logical deduction"...

For instance, would you care to "logically deduce" why President Bush will NOT enforce the Mexican Border after 9/11?

Why millions of illegal invaders have been allowed to cross the border unimpeded?

Now let's go backwards...

Why was the Warren Commission report on Kennedy buried for 75 years?

Why are hundreds of witnesses' testimony of Flight 800 ignored?

Why have investigations and evidence been repressed or ignored regarding Waco, OKC, and recently Able Danger?

"We're at war, and the MSM acts as if it's all just a game. Drooling over bogus poll numbers, gleefully blaming President Bush for Hamas' victory. (What will he do now that his democracy doctrine just blew up in his face!!) They're out of their minds."--- practical realist.

Thank the Lord for the many who are totally unfazed by all this minutely documented BS. None of it has any bearing on anything,save to provide Bush/America Haters silly talking points to criticize the POTUS after the SOTUS.

They are the losers who need these elaborate "fact-based" lies to create the illusions that they desperately hang onto while their dominion whithers and dies.

For instance, would you care to "logically deduce" why President Bush will NOT enforce the Mexican Border after 9/11?

He would need a congressional mandate but fed. border control officers have doubled. You cannot put federal troops in a state without that states permission. Each state is responsible for its own borders. Each state has guard units it can use if they wish. There is a bill in congress to build a fence if passed. Bush did not open the border, it has been open over a 100 years. Bush can only propose and his proposals have not been acted upon. Congress has the responsibility for action and the cost of any such action.

Why millions of illegal invaders have been allowed to cross the border unimpeded?

They have crossed the border for over a hundred years and no one has stopped them. It is not new. The US had a policy of open borders. This policy is being debated in the public and will be changed if, and when congress changes law, makes new law, or enforces old law and aproves the money for such.

Why was the Warren Commission report on Kennedy buried for 75 years?

It is public knowledge but was withheld for 20 years by a act of congress pertaining to national security. You can read it. More than a 1000 books and investigations have been written and conducted to prove or disprove their findings. There is no empirical proof disproving the commission's findings. Other than minor variances using the latest technology most concur that their finding's are essentially correct. Their are other opinions but they are not borne out by facts but only opinion.

Why are hundreds of witnesses' testimony of Flight 800 ignored?

Maybe because when compared with other witness's, empirical evidence and fact they were not creditable. No testimony was denied or ignored that was presented. Whether it was believable or not, after reviewing thousand's of others testimony, is in the judgment of those doing the investigation.

Why have investigations and evidence been repressed or ignored regarding Waco, OKC, and recently Able Danger?

They have not been repressed or ignored. In fact they have been investigated extensively and continue to be investigated. While I would like to see new evidence or facts none has been forthcoming and anyone acquiring new facts or evidence would be famous. Able Danger is interesting and probable, however without the chart there is no proof that it existed. That is not to say that more evidence can knot be found but until then the suppositions and opinions of a few will not overcome those of the many.

Rasmussen: Bush Approval 49% 'National Adults' (52% 'Likely Voters')
01/29/2006 9:57:10 AM PST

Rasmussen Reports ^ | January 29, 2006 | Scott Rasmussen
Sunday January 29, 2006--Forty-nine percent (49%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty percent (50%) disapprove. It is not clear whether this uptick in Job Approval over the past three days is a lasting change or merely statistical noise. The President earns approval from 81% of Republicans, 23% of Democrats, and 40% of those not affiliated with either major political party. Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty (R) holds a very modest lead over Attorney General Mike Hatch (DFL) in his bid for re-election. The Minnesota Senate race is a toss-up. Premium...

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.