Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jec41
"Who fixed what and where did they vote. Where did the NWO vote?"

You won't find that kind of info in your local newspaper, will you?

Call it what you want -- the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the Bilderbergers, the Skull and Bones -- the world's elites.

Maybe you would care to explain the un-explainable....

Like how Bubba Clinton inexplicably beat 1001 reasons for impeachment?

How GH Bush obviously ran a campaign to lose it.

How Perot came out of NO WHERE to garnish nearly 20% of the popular vote?

How NO GOP CANDIDATE publically mentioned ANY of the 1001 reasons why not to vote for Bubba either time?

September 11, 1990

"We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a new world order -- can emerge: a new era -- freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice."

~ George H. Bush ~

62 posted on 01/29/2006 11:23:34 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: F16Fighter
Maybe you would care to explain the un-explainable....

That would require proof by logical deduction and observance and could be refuted by the same logical deduction and observance. Lacking any facts or empirical evidence at best, it could only be philosophy and argued by logical deduction. A argument that is not supported by logical deduction and observance is then but a opinion by a opinionest who would seek to impose views asserting that if something is not known then it must be what the opinionest thinks. Most conspiracies are more opinion than fact and yours is no different.
63 posted on 01/29/2006 12:01:11 PM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson