Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Weak Ratings Confront Bush Ahead of State of Union
ABCNews.com ^ | 1/29/06 | GARY LANGER

Posted on 01/29/2006 6:36:34 AM PST by madprof98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: madprof98

President Bush Job Approval 49%

Sunday January 29, 2006--Forty-nine percent (49%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. Fifty percent (50%) disapprove.

The President earns approval from 81% of Republicans, 23% of Democrats, and 40% of those not affiliated with either major political party.

RasmussenReports.com


Looks pretty good to me!


41 posted on 01/29/2006 8:03:15 AM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MillerCreek
The US Military is amazing and has proven itself over and over again. Unfortunately the Democrats and MSM have lost much credibility over the past 3+ years. And their leadership today can best be described as limp and traitorous.
42 posted on 01/29/2006 8:26:07 AM PST by Chgogal (When you have the chance to climb the mountain, do so. You never know what truths you will find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Yes, agree as to all you write!


43 posted on 01/29/2006 8:29:15 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

However, in agreement, this brings to mind here the impact of the 'anti war'/"peace" movement people like Sheehan and such who are, in fact, eager for a non-military capabiity of and by the U.S. and how many liberal types fall victim to being influenced by that as if it was a rosey, rainbow solution to the world's woes (and our own).

Point being that the terrorist attacks of 09/11 shocked many Americans into recognizing that although we/they may not relish a degree of military capability by the U.S., that there are many others in our world today who are ruthless and insane, even, and seek our destruction. Many Americans during Clinton's terms were lulled into some stupified sense of prosperity that they lost sight of the rest of the world's aggression and what threat it poses to us and to others.

Thus, also lulled into thinking that the money necessary to maintain a capable military was superfluous.

I also believe that's what enables people like Sheehan and the rest...they claim some higher purpose of "peace" and yet congratulate and encourage those who wish us harm for wishing us harm. Thus, the propoganda method of the "peace" movement...to effect a weak and doubtful America, to encourage our enemies to increase their aggression upon us and allies.

The film, "Munich," comes to mind here.


44 posted on 01/29/2006 8:34:57 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Crap!!!! Bill Clinton was elected president with only 43% of the vote in 1992. There would never have been a democrat president if the conservative base had not decide to cut off their nose to spite their face and vote for Ross. He didn't do much better in 1996. Conservatives set their own cause back 20 years. They would have had a republican congress. the presidency and two more conservative judges on the supreme court. It would seem that they want to repeat the process.
45 posted on 01/29/2006 8:36:26 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
a random national sample of 1,002 adults.

Or a 90-10 split would be more accurate! Add 10-15% to those numbers to find the actuals. Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters

46 posted on 01/29/2006 8:37:47 AM PST by bray (President Bush Protects America. The Rats Protect Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

The only polls I worry about open in 9 months. Who gives a damn what the President's day-to-day rating is almost a year before the election? It's not like he is up for re-election tomorrow (or at all).

At the end of the day, people gotta go into a booth and flip a lever for the (D) or the (R). The Donks have proven themselves to be completely non-serious, which is a fatal flaw in such serious times.

It is one thing to gripe about the President. It is an altogether different thing to elect some Democrat moron.


47 posted on 01/29/2006 8:40:07 AM PST by gridlock (It's not really a circus until a Kennedy steps out of the clown car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
I always vote, yet I'm never called. Of course I never pick up with unidentified numbers on caller ID.
48 posted on 01/29/2006 8:44:40 AM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

read my tagline please


49 posted on 01/29/2006 8:58:20 AM PST by italianquaker (Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tndarlin
Who are these people and which economy do they live in?

They live in the economy the MSM tells them they live in.

50 posted on 01/29/2006 9:00:51 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Defeatism may have its partisan uses but it is not justified by the facts.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Here is a question in the current Zogby poll:

Which event has had a more significant impact on the U.S.? The 9/11 terror attacks or Hurricane Katrina?


9/11-type attack
Hurricane Katrina
Neither
Not sure


51 posted on 01/29/2006 9:12:21 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Ok... so 1,043 random people polled, but they didn't tell us what the breakout of political part is.

Also its obvious this isn't registered or likely voters just 1,043 random people.

Typical... oversample dems by 10 percent then act surprised there is a 5% drop in something.

Then write up 10 times more front page 'news-editorial' based on the poll, pick a few questions that tells the story they want, and distance from any inconvienent facts like the actual numbers.
52 posted on 01/29/2006 9:13:16 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Oh, geez, look at this one:

Why do you believe the 9/11 terror attacks were more important in their repercussions for the U.S.?

Highlighted threat from terror groups
Highlighted weaknesses in domestic intelligence capabilities
Highlighted weaknesses in defense capabilities
Led to more muscular foreign policy
Resulted in Iraq war
Expanded government powers
Eroded civil liberties
Revealed that U.S. has new, dangerous enemies abroad
Other
Not sure

and this:

Which event do you believe will be considered more important 30 years from now? The 9/11 terror attacks or Hurricane Katrina?

9/11terror attacks
Hurricane Katrina
Neither
Not sure

53 posted on 01/29/2006 9:15:19 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
ABC News/Washington Post poll

And somehow that's different from a CBS/New York Times poll??

54 posted on 01/29/2006 9:18:43 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad

On Fox News this morning a guest was saying the GOP pollsters have the President in a range between 42% and 52%. I guess a lot of where he falls in a poll depends on who is polled. I doubt that a sampling that is heavy on voters who did not vote for Bush would drive up his numbers. The MSM would have us believe their polls are accurate when they are not. Any more I laugh at any of the polls and the interpretations of them.


55 posted on 01/29/2006 9:19:47 AM PST by Bombard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Start of Sixth-Year Approval Ratings Job Approval Rating President: Bush 42% Clinton: 60% Reagan 65% Nixon 26% Eisenhower 58% Truman 45%

Doesn't the press remember that for bj, they had to run two polls, one for job approval, one for bj approval? His real numbers were so bad that this was the only technique they could use to show him in a reasonably good light. They never used this double poll technique before or since the stain on the blue dress finally stole his last piece of Whitehouse silverware.

56 posted on 01/29/2006 9:20:53 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Psssst: ABC, your jig is up. No one is listening to your gloom & doom critiques on President Bush, thank God.

His poll numbers will skyrocket after the SOTU speech. You traitors can take it to the bank.

57 posted on 01/29/2006 9:23:52 AM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec41
" Bill Clinton was elected president with only 43% of the vote in 1992. There would never have been a democrat president if the conservative base had not decide to cut off their nose to spite their face and vote for Ross."

Blame the lackluster, indifferent, uninspiring sham campaign GH Bush ran at the behest of the NWO. Perot was a NWO puppet as well.

58 posted on 01/29/2006 9:25:38 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Blame the lackluster, indifferent, uninspiring sham campaign GH Bush ran at the behest of the NWO. Perot was a NWO puppet as well.

If that was the case and they were both NWO puppets then 57% voted for NWO puppets. It was more probably a case of read my lips , no more new taxes from Bush. After making the promise he compromised with the democrats at the last moment rather than shut the government down. The democrats turned it against him and read my lips became their campaign theme. Rather than vote for Clinton or Bush 20% elected to vote for Perot
59 posted on 01/29/2006 10:10:27 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jec41
"If that was the case and they were both NWO puppets then 57% voted for NWO puppets."

The fix was in --Bubba was the real NWO selection...

The tax issue sounds good, but not serious enough for Bush to have lost. He ran a sham campaign by ANYONE who's ever seen a real campaign. The reticent and kid-glove Dole was another sham candidate and NWO puppet who didn't have a prayer -- DESPITE Bubba's many issues he could have easily hammered him on.

A less resolved America, more liberal America, weaker defense, a "balanced" SC, and moral relativism mean a weakened American sovereignty -- a prerequisite for a a stronger NWO.

60 posted on 01/29/2006 10:24:02 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson