Posted on 01/28/2006 8:05:41 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
Chancellor Angela Merkel has pushed Germany's low birth rate to the top of the political agenda for the first time since the Nazi era as an expert said the nation could die out if the trend continued.
A third of German women are not having children, a remarkable figure even compared with low birth rates in the rest of Europe. Among graduates the figure is as high as 40 per cent.
Every year 100,000 more Germans die than are born and each generation is shrinking by about a third.
Even in the poverty and despair after the Second World War, more babies were born than now. The figure has slumped to 1.3 children per woman, far short of the replacement rate of 2.1.
Some observers attribute the trend to young people's reluctance to sacrifice their comfortable way of life and leisure time to bring up the next generation.
Others argue that German society expects women to stay at home to look after the family and that child care is inadequate and expensive.
Mrs Merkel, 51, is not the best role model: she has no children. Asked why, she said: "It just did not fit in with my career path."
But she is fully aware that the onus is on her, the country's first female leader, to improve the lot of women, raise the birth rate and put Germany back at the top as an economic power within a decade.
"If the birth rate continues to fall, Germans are at risk of dying out," said Harald Michel, the head of the Institute for Applied Demography. He foresees a future in which the workforce will be unable to support the elderly, nor indeed the country.
Past reluctance to tackle the problem is largely explained by the sensitivity of child-bearing in a country which, under the Nazis, did all it could to raise the birth rate for the state.
"The Nazi ideal of kinder, küche, kirche (children, kitchen, church) still prevails," said Jutta Schmidt, 33, a sociologist and mother of two children from Hamburg.
"The pressure on women to fulfil the maternal role, coupled with the lack of support to carry it out, such as part-time jobs and child care provision, is so great that many would rather forgo the opportunity than risk failure."
In Nazi times women were awarded motherhood medals for bearing children. Child bearing was strictly under the control of the state, not the individual.
Had Ursula von der Leyen, 47, been a mother in the Third Reich, she would have won the silver medal. She is a gynaecologist, a mother of seven and, as the family minister, is Mrs Merkel's greatest hope.
She says that Germany is "extremely backward" in its attitude towards the family. Unless the birth rate rises, "we will have to turn out the light".
Mrs von der Leyen, a member of the Christian Democratic Union, has offered women one-year wage replacement subsidies and to raise the amount of child care that can be offset against tax. But some of her proposals, such as encouraging fathers to stay at home for two months after the birth of a child, have provoked stiff opposition even from male party colleagues. They accuse her of wanting to "tie men to the nappies".
For many, child care and not money is at the root of the problem. The country that invented the kindergarten 170 years ago is pitifully lacking in child care places.
Only 10 per cent of children under three have access to pre-school care and most of those are sent home at noon, a 2001 study showed. In Denmark the figure is 64 per cent and in Britain 34 per cent.
The problem is exacerbated by employers who are unwilling to help workers with young children - and schools, most of which also close at noon.
"People have to give up their careers because there are no child care places," said Renate Köcher, the director of the Allensbach polling institute. "And because they have given up their jobs, we have neglected to create more child care places."
Germany is also a country in which everything happens comparatively late. The average starting school age is almost seven. University takes the best part of a decade to complete, so the average student is in her late twenties when she graduates.
Therefore, finding a job, particularly in these days of high unemployment, stands much higher on the list of priorities than having babies.
Like that's going to happen in Germany.
Yes, that's what the market operates on, but it's a perversion to use the word "incentives" to apply it to market-based implementation of a socialist policy.
What you're saying is that we penalize people who aren't blessed with children to subsidize those who are (i.e., charge the former higher taxes), and you support raising that subsidy even more.
What you need to ask yourself is why people have children, and what are the pros and cons of it. Why is there a lower need for couples to have children than in the past (many reason; hint for one: no longer so farm-based here in US)? Look beyond just using the market for implementation of central planning, and see if there are elements within it that we can learn from.
"That is funny"....well, when it happens here, in the next few years...it will NOT seem funny....
;-D
I don't have a clue. I've seen lots of anti-Muslim comments and have probably posted some myself. I suppose it might depend on the language used?
Any you're laughed at for being a DU troll.
Typical leftist, call anyone you dislike a NAZI.
Notice you're over at a Coulter attacking her too.
Phony Conservative alert.
In the United States, the teen abortion rate is nearly eight times higher than the rate in Germany, nearly seven times higher than that in the Netherlands, and nearly three times higher than the rate in France
Our tax system provides incentives to have and raise children.
Here in the United States, there's day care available if you're willing to pay whatever the rate is. We have a one year old son, and we just decided to put him in daycare for 5 hours a week (2.5 hours 2 days a week). My wife stays home, but we just wanted a day care place for our son with minimal time so he would get over his separation anxiety, and it would also give my wife a chance to do things she can't possibly do with the baby in tow (dentist appointment, even getting the oil changed in the car). Sure enough, there was a place in town that was willing to do it by the hour. There are places that wouldn't take him less than full time, but there were several places to choose from, and thus the market worked.
Why isn't the market working in Germany? When the market doesn't work, and you dig deeper, you find that either 1) it really is working, but the prices are higher than most people think would be "fair" and thus they don't buy the services, or 2) there's some sort of government intervention that is preventing the process from working.
"In the United States, the teen abortion rate is nearly eight times higher than the rate in Germany, nearly seven times higher than that in the Netherlands, and nearly three times higher than the rate in France"
When the young are orientated to worshipping abortion (rights)...
Bump!
Well, then, you're in favor of equal tax treatment and pay-for-what-you-use. Why didn't you say so to begin with?
If you'd like to be on this Death of the West ping list, please FR mail me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.