Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Blast bucket’ looked at by Marines
Marine Corps News ^ | Jan 26, 2006 | Cpl. Jonathan Agg

Posted on 01/28/2006 5:12:33 PM PST by SandRat

MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, Va. (Jan. 26, 2006) -- The Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory hosted an Office of Naval Research presentation of the Ultra Armored Patrol “Concept” Vehicle to senior Army acquisition officials Jan. 18.

Lt. Gen. Joseph L. Yakovac Jr., military deputy to the assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology, and his deputy, Maj. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sorenson, attended the hour-long briefing, as did program officers from MCWL and Marine Corps Combat Development Command. A viewing of the vehicle, which features innovative systems and components which potentially could enhance survivability and performance, followed the presentation.

The Ultra is a diesel-propelled, four-passenger vehicle capable of reaching 60 mph. The Ultra’s “blast bucket” cabin is built on a Ford F-350 chassis and, when armored, may be able to protect up to four passengers who are arranged in an outward, 360-degree facing orientation. But this has not been tested. Jeffrey Bradel, ONR’s manager of Marine Corps maneuver science and technology, led the Jan. 18 presentation and said hollow tubes in the blast bucket’s frame could theoretically channel the blast from an improvised explosive device to minimize damage to the Ultra and injury to its occupants.

The Office of Naval Research used expertise from academia, industry and government, including the principal design, which was developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Despite Ultra’s promising design, ONR representatives close to the project are cautious about touting the vehicle as the next humvee.

“A lot of the guys on the project are sensitive about throwing around the phrase, ‘humvee replacement,’” said Colin Babb, science writer and editor of OrigiNatoR, ONR’s internal newsletter. “The bottom line about Ultra is the vehicle is more about testing the central part, the armored blast bucket. That’s the novel part. Someone could turn that into a vehicle if they wanted to, but really the central idea is testing a combination of components, which is true of most of ONR’s prototypes. They’re about testing the technology and showing it off, not necessarily about building preproduction vehicles, whether they’re ships or land vehicles as in this case.”

Yakovac said the Ultra’s radical design could influence the next generation of the Humvee or its eventual replacement.

“It’s a concept vehicle, and from it we will get a lot of good ideas for the Army and Marines, as we go about this in a joint manner to best meet the challenges of the future, not only with capability, but the balance of capability with cost,” Yakovac said. “Neither service can afford to do it alone anymore. You’re talking a quantum leap in costs, in development, production and ownership. Unfortunately, that’s what drives all this. It’s about how much money modern capability costs. Unless we leverage that together, we won’t be able to afford the future.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: armored; blast; bucket; concept; humvee; marines; patrol; replacement; ultra; vehicle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Reaganesque
Put a dual .50 and a coaxial Mark 19 on it and you've got a real serious ride.

L

21 posted on 01/28/2006 7:56:12 PM PST by Lurker (I trust in God. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
the principal design, which was developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology.

A Rambling Wreck, you might say.

22 posted on 01/28/2006 8:10:27 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

BTTT


23 posted on 01/29/2006 3:05:04 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Blast bucket"? They need to work on the name. "War wagon" sounds much better to me! That was the nickname we gave my pick-up in high school.

That name brings back many memories of the 50,s through the 80's when as an over-the-road 18 wheeler(and sometimes many wheels)driver as well as an oilfield hauler; drilling rigs, gas compressors, pumping units, tubular goods, you name it, after 38 years I very likely hauled everything in the oilfield at least a hundred times a piece.

But I digress from the original subject, "War Wagon" was my C.B. "handle"!

Now be honest doesn't that just make your day?

Goodbye!

VOYAGER

24 posted on 01/29/2006 3:39:50 AM PST by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Might hurt the gas milage.


25 posted on 01/29/2006 3:54:24 AM PST by Recon Dad (Force Recon Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stormlead

Knowing Marines, C-130 Maybe, because of gross weight but, the others that is probably a cinch.

Just for ugliness alone there should be a civilian model; with much better gas milage after all the HEAVY armor is replaced with standard automotive tin-foil.


26 posted on 01/29/2006 7:06:59 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson