Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bird flu nightmare needs wake-up call
Scotsman.com ^ | January 28th, 2006 | Al Avlicino

Posted on 01/28/2006 1:29:23 PM PST by Termite_Commander

YEARS ago when I first started studying the avian influenza virus H5N1, it seemed highly unlikely that it would ever develop into pandemic status. I believed it might eventually trigger a conventional bout of flu, but certainly nothing to the degree of its H1N1 ancestor, the 1918 Spanish Flu that killed 50 to 100 million people.

I have followed this virus in its inexorable march towards a pandemic, seen how it kept surprising the experts by picking up more and more human-infectious traits, until now there is virtually no doubt that there will be a worldwide avian flu pandemic and that H5N1 will be responsible for it.

We have all heard the projections from avian influenza experts like Dr Michael Osterholm that in a single flu season as many as 360 million people could die. That figure is unimaginable. It's the total number of dead from the Boxing Day Tsunami every two hours, or a fully loaded 747 crashing every 13 seconds, around the clock for months on end. Three million dead in the UK alone or the equivalent of six Edinburghs.

The global integrated economy cannot survive a pandemic of this magnitude. Absenteeism rates of upwards of 75 per cent caused by illness and panic would cripple food distribution, utility access and virtually all other commerce. The bleak vision of surviving on canned food and bottled water in cold, dark homes, fearful of stepping outdoors for months on end, could happen right here in Scotland and around the world.

Do not make the error of assuming this cannot happen here. Migratory birds from Western China brought H5N1 to Turkey in early October where it lay undetected until people started dying a couple of weeks ago. Those migratory patterns continue into North Africa and Western Europe. When will H5N1 arrive in Scotland? Judging by the Turkish model, it may already be here. Let's not even consider what can happen when an infected individual arrives at Edinburgh Airport.

The 1918 pandemic started in an Army barracks in Kansas. Within one week the virus was present in all 48 contiguous United States in an era where the only modes of transport were trains and horses. The spread of this virus in the jet age is unimaginable. There likely would not be a corner of the Earth where this modern plague would not be present within weeks, maybe days.

The virus needs to pick up another trait or two to become as easily transmitted between humans as a common cold. That could happen at any time or it may already have begun.

Developing a vaccine against H5N1 is like targeting a clay pigeon. You have to shoot ahead of the target to allow the bullet and clay to intersect. Unfortunately H5N1 is a pigeon that does random, sudden 90 degree turns. It is the ultimate moving target. The time to develop and manufacture a global vaccine is six to eight months. By that time, the avian flu virus will likely have mutated into a form that is immune to the vaccine.

Current flu vaccines have no effect on H5N1, and although it is recommended that everyone be vaccinated, we should be clear in the knowledge that should a pandemic start, there is no protection from current vaccines or certainly from antiviral drugs. The antivirals of choice right now are Roche's Tamiflu and Glaxo's Relenza. The UK has ordered more than £200 million of Tamiflu, believing that it could help fend off the pandemic. Unfortunately, Tamiflu is fairly useless as an avian flu pandemic fighter.

In a recent Asian study Tamiflu was proven as ineffective as sugar pills against some H5N1 strains. The best use for these drugs is as a preventative, taking at least two doses per day from the moment the first virus arrives in your area and throughout all the months of the flu wave.

To provide everyone in the world with this albeit minor preventative measure would require, in a conservative calculation, 650 billion pills or the equivalent to the total weight of the Queen Elizabeth II fully loaded with passengers and cargo just in pure Tamiflu! All we have to do is write a cheque to Roche for one trillion pounds. And it still wouldn't stop the pandemic.

Thorough hygiene and other common-sense precautions are the only ways to blunt the impact of this pandemic. Raw poultry must be considered as a biohazard. Surfaces and clothing must be disinfected with bleach. It's time to rediscover the "disinfect everything" policy of the NHS matrons of the 1950s.

H5N1 could surprise us all and evolve into a squirrel or koala virus, sparing humanity. However, the chances of that occurring are next to zero. The world is fully unprepared. The onus must shift from wasting billions on "magic bullet" drugs that don't work to preparation and survivability.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: avianflu; avianinfluenza; birdflu; h5n1; influenza; osterholm; pandemic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Termite_Commander
"Because there would not be a shift from a virus that kills 20% or so of people who get it, to a virus that kills nobody. It becoming a squirrel virus would be more likely."

Why assume the virus will be deadly once it changes into another virus? It’s a different virus if it can affect us. A different virus has a different rate of lethality. Why assume a 5% death rate for something they can’t even model? Why not a death rate similar to the common flue? If you’re going to go make that assumption, you might as assume mutations from every other viruses that’s deadly to other animal will kill us.

I’ve seen FR go through 2-3 pandemic panics, and they’re always promoted by a small group who wants to raise awareness. They always mention 1918 as if advances in hygiene, medical understanding, medical care and communications have little effect on isolating a new bug. I’m sure after the bird flue plays out, there’ll be another “killer flue” for some to take it upon themselves to spread awareness of and to worry about.

21 posted on 01/28/2006 3:07:54 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
It’s a different virus if it can affect us be easily transmitted between us.
22 posted on 01/28/2006 3:10:34 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Judith Anne; crystal wind; Oorang; blam

FYI. I think I got you all.

Did you get the article about elderberries and the possibility (or likelihood, according to the article) that they may help even with avian flu?


23 posted on 01/28/2006 3:15:21 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

Nice apocalyptic writing. People really enjoy the good scare that comes with any consideration of the end of the world - asteroid impact, nuclear war, the Second Coming, superflu. However, disease tends toward becoming less and less virulent over time. It's true that catching a disease from another species can be deadly - I once contracted brucellosis after caribou hunting, a disease adapted to hoofed animals, and it almost killed me. But it didn't - my body beat it back before I needed hospitalization. Bird flu contracted by humans is deadly. A human flu derived from bird flu would be far less deadly. This doesn't mean it would nice to experience, either, but I doubt it would lead to the collapse of civilization. One more comment: in Barbara Tuchman's book about the 14th century ("A Distant Mirror"), the Black Death is one of the elements that led to the creation of Western Civilization. I don't want to die from the flu, nor my family, neighbors, friends, or townspeople, but humanity would survive.


24 posted on 01/28/2006 3:26:39 PM PST by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I did. I don't know what to make of it. I know if Bird Flu becomes widespread we'll be doing everything we can to protect ourselves.


25 posted on 01/28/2006 3:26:49 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
Why assume the virus will be deadly once it changes into another virus? It’s a different virus if it can affect us.

If a virus shuffles around some of its protein structure, it doesn't technically make it a different virus. It's a mutated virus. It would still be (A)H5N1, only with a couple different genes.

A different virus has a different rate of lethality.

Not necessarily, but I see your point. It depends on what part of the virus actually mutates.

Why assume a 5% death rate for something they can’t even model?

Er, that 5% number was not scientific in any way. I just pulled a number out of my head and stuck it in there to make a point. I don't know of any models that have a 5% CFR. Sorry for the confusion.

Why not a death rate similar to the common flue?Because the common flu's death rate is extremely small, and this virus's death rate is extremely high. It would be virtually impossible for H5N1, the deadliest influenza strain ever seen, to mutate into a highly benign strain.

If you’re going to go make that assumption, you might as assume mutations from every other viruses that’s deadly to other animal will kill us.

I'm sorry. I don't quite understand what you're saying. We've looked at the genome of the H1N1 virus, found 10 critical amino acid mutations, and now we're watching for those mutations to occur on H5N1. It's not the best way to go about things, because H5N1 and H1N1 are fundamentally different, but it's the best we can do at the moment.

I’ve seen FR go through 2-3 pandemic panics, and they’re always promoted by a small group who wants to raise awareness. They always mention 1918 as if advances in hygiene, medical understanding, medical care and communications have little effect on isolating a new bug. I’m sure after the bird flue plays out, there’ll be another “killer flue” for some to take it upon themselves to spread awareness of and to worry about.

If we're all a bunch of panic-mongering fools, and the warnings are utter nonsense, why do you trouble yourself coming in to shoot them all down? Since we're kooks, don't waste your time on us.
26 posted on 01/28/2006 3:30:20 PM PST by Termite_Commander (Warning: Cynical Right-winger Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: redpoll
Well Redpoll, I don't think anybody's quite talking about the "collapse of civilization". Although there was some apocalyptic talk coming out of the World Economic Forum (in fact, they even said it could be a 21st century "Black Death"), I think even their "Worse-Case scenario" stopped short of forecasting the end of the world.

As I'm sure you'll agree, a pandemic could certainly screw up some main elements to civilization for a bit (like business, travel, public services, etc.), but after the virus began winding down, they would recover, as usual.

"A human flu derived from bird flu would be far less deadly."

In all likelihood, you're right. It's important to note, however, that both the 1957 and 1968 pandemics, which were both very mild, were recombinants that popped up after mixing in pigs. With the H1N1 and H5N1 strain, such mixing is not necessary. The virus in 1918 went straight from bird to human, without the mixing vessel. This means the virus doesn't need to lose any of its deadliness in a recombination process.
27 posted on 01/28/2006 3:43:57 PM PST by Termite_Commander (Warning: Cynical Right-winger Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

For the last time, bird flew, or bird has flown!


28 posted on 01/28/2006 3:45:03 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Your screen name makes me smile every time.

Especially since I have two cats snoring on my desk.
29 posted on 01/28/2006 3:48:48 PM PST by Termite_Commander (Warning: Cynical Right-winger Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander
"The world is fully unprepared. "

Not so, I'm presently prepared for:

* A category five hurricane. And, any looters.

* A war with Iran that could cut our oil/gas supplies.(maybe for months) And, any domestic terrorist activity associated with the war.

* A flu pandemic that could last for 6 months to two years. And, any domestic violence that may be associated.

* A small 'city-busting' asteroid impact. And, a subsequent possible 1-2 year 'cosmic-winter'.

30 posted on 01/28/2006 3:50:03 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

I agree with you - I was referring to the writer of the article, who appeared to relish the thought of impending chaos, and I'm really, really tired of hearing about how awful things will be in the near future from the threat of (fill in the blank). I prefer faith and hope in my worldview. I grew up in the 60s, where I was fed a daily diet of imminent collapse from nukes, overpopulation, pollution, science run amok, computers taking over the world... in the 70s I was told that the world would run out resources, there would be global famines, an ice age was coming, Nixon was going to be the next Hitler... or was that Reagan as the next Hitler... or George Bush, yeah, he was a CIA guy... anyway, you get the idea.

I would prefer not to see an epidemic of anything, of course. I can't stop one, either. Relishing gory details feels like a waste of time to me, that's all.


31 posted on 01/28/2006 4:00:47 PM PST by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

The Great Influenza by Barry. After I read it I read the same author's book Rising Tide about the Mississippi flood of 1927. Both were superb. I am into disastor reading ever since the storm!!


32 posted on 01/28/2006 4:08:21 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: redpoll
People really enjoy the good scare that comes with any consideration of the end of the world - asteroid impact, nuclear war, the Second Coming, superflu. However, disease tends toward becoming less and less virulent over time.

Redpoll, I enjoy a good scare, so long as it's fiction.

Unfortunately, the H5N1 is a valid worry. Keep in mind that influenza viruses are especially good mutaters. And, once its gene sequence changes to that which makes for human-to-human infection, we won't have much time to react.

The author's point that virus hosts (that is, infected humans) could be unknowingly jetted around the world is key to the critical nature of the public health threat.

Another poster mentioned case fatality rate, and that is what worries so many experts.

.

33 posted on 01/28/2006 4:09:40 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander
It does turn out that there is one effective medication for the flu-infected birds...

...people soup.

(Such a serious topic, it needed a bit of humor.)

34 posted on 01/28/2006 4:11:40 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander
MRE's are good sustenance whilst traveling but your regular dry stores from Wal-Mart or Costoco or Winco are far more economical.
35 posted on 01/28/2006 4:13:45 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
"...people soup."

Should we avoid people who died from the bird flu?

36 posted on 01/28/2006 4:23:32 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jocon307; Termite_Commander
The 20% fatalities . . . will it be the elderly and infirm or what are the "risk factors" likely to be?
37 posted on 01/28/2006 4:25:20 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Trident/Delta

There were cases reported in Basra last week.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562819/posts


38 posted on 01/28/2006 4:28:31 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

"The 20% fatalities . . . will it be the elderly and infirm or what are the "risk factors" likely to be?"

Ben, I'm going to have to let TC answer your precise question. What's clear is that "bird flu" has killed many young, and not so young, but healthy people who have contracted it. Like the other poster says about her grandfather, in the 1918 epidemic, people were in perfectly good health in the morning and dead by nightfall. So these virulent viruses can really strike a person down.


39 posted on 01/28/2006 5:13:13 PM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Interestingly, it seems to be affecting younger people.

In Turkey (where I got that 20% figure from), only 2 people out of the 20 cases there were older than 18.

Some are saying it's because the kids are more likely to be playing in the chicken coops, or interacting with the chickens, or they're less sanitary.

Others say it might favor them for some reason or another. We really wouldn't know unless a pandemic actually happened.


40 posted on 01/28/2006 5:14:17 PM PST by Termite_Commander (Warning: Cynical Right-winger Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson