Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuality: A public health disaster
WorldNetDaily ^ | 1/28/06 | David Bass

Posted on 01/28/2006 12:51:09 PM PST by wagglebee

The raging debate over homosexual marriage took another interesting turn this week when Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge M. Brooke Murdock struck down Maryland's state law defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The decision, handed down Jan. 20, claimed that Family Law §2-201 unfairly abridged the fundamental marriage rights of the nine homosexual couples who filed the lawsuit.

Judge Murdock was not satisfied with merely striking down the state statute, however. In her written opinion, the circuit court judge went several steps further by claiming that the prohibition of same-sex marriage in no way "rationally relates to a legitimate state interest." Murdock also dismissed the notion that same-sex marriage has any negative influence on traditional marriages or the nuclear family, or that "tradition and social values alone" can bolster what she deemed a "discriminatory statutory classification."

Regrettably, such rationale neglects one of the most critical elements in the emotionally charged debate over same-sex marriage and homosexual behavior in general – public health. As witnessed by Judge Murdock's decision, the issue of health is often turned aside in favor of arguments that hinge more on politics than fact. The problem with such a trend is obvious – the health ramifications of homosexual behavior should be at the forefront of the public policy debate, not on the periphery.

That is the principle reason conservatives should concentrate on both the cultural consequences of homosexual behavior and the public health ramifications. Such an argument will be a winner every time, especially when the facts are clearly presented.

For those who doubt, consider the evidence:

  1. Sexually transmitted diseases – Research gathered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, has found significantly higher rates of rectal gonorrhea, HIV/AIDS and all three strains of Hepatitis among homosexuals. Other studies have likewise linked homosexuality with increased rates of Human Papillomavirus (the leading cause of cervical cancer worldwide), syphilis and anal cancer. Although self-identified homosexuals account for less than 5 percent of the American population, they are the carriers of over 50 percent of HIV/AIDS cases.

  2. Risky behaviors – Campaigns to foster so-called "safe sex" among homosexuals have done nothing to reduce risky behavior. A 1997 CDC report found that among homosexuals who had unprotected anal intercourse and multiple sexual partners, 68 percent were entirely unaware of the HIV status of their partners.

  3. Promiscuity – A large percentage of homosexual men have hundreds of sexual partners throughout their lifetime. According to a profile of 2,583 homosexuals published in the Journal of Sex Research, only 2.7 reported having had sexual relations with only one partner, compared to the largest percentage that claimed to have had between 101 and 500 partners over their lifetime. Compare that to the markedly lower promiscuity rates among married heterosexual couples. According to the latest statistics from the CDC, 92 percent of married males and 93 percent of married females reported having had only one sexual partner over the previous twelve months (presumably their spouses).

  4. Domestic abuse – A survey conducted by the Journal of Social Service Research found that more than half of lesbian respondents reported having been abused by a female partner or lover. Conversely, research has found that married heterosexual women experience the lowest rates of domestic abuse compared to other types of relationships.

  5. Life span – A 1997 study published in the International Journal of Epidemiology found that even under "the most liberal assumptions, gay and bisexual men in this urban center are now experiencing a life expectancy similar to that experienced by all men in Canada in the year 1871." The same study estimated that homosexual behavior reduces the lifespan of males by eight to 20 years. Comparatively, the CDC has found that male and female smokers lose an average of 13.2 to 14.5 years of life, respectively.

These findings are not those of conservative pro-family advocacy groups, but of non-partisan, non-political medical journals and organizations devoted to protecting public health. What conclusion can logically be reached other than that homosexual behavior is both hazardous to the public at large and often deadly to those who practice it?

For those who promote homosexual behavior in the name of love and tolerance, it's time to take a hard look at the facts surrounding the lifestyle. If someone is suffering from terminal cancer, is hiding the diagnosis and potential treatments of the disease the loving thing to do? Homosexuality is a cancer that affects every area of life – from the psychological to the spiritual – yet the medical facts are commonly swept under the carpet by politically motivated medical organizations and liberalism as a whole.

Those both inside and outside government ranks who truly value human beings created in the image of God will recognize the importance of being candid about the deadly health risks associated with homosexual behavior. Unlike modern interpretations of tolerance, true agape love has the ultimate physical, psychological and spiritual well-being of the individual at heart.

The good news is change is possible, but it starts with honesty. Homosexuality is not a benign lifestyle preference, but a death-sentence made possible by government neglect of public health concerns. Tragically, Judge Murdock's ruling is another despicable example of a jurisprudence that is eroding the public welfare in the name of tolerance.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; gays; hiv; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; perverts; publichealth; stds; wildnutdazzly; wingnutdoozy; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: wagglebee

Too bad the demoncRAT governor and the demoncRAT-run WA State Legislature doesn't believe this. They just passed the bill giving queers special rights.


21 posted on 01/28/2006 2:20:01 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Gays get special rights; smokers get no rights.


22 posted on 01/28/2006 2:28:27 PM PST by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

HA Ping.


23 posted on 01/28/2006 2:33:10 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

bump


24 posted on 01/28/2006 2:34:00 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Absolutely. WA is an upside down state.


25 posted on 01/28/2006 2:35:01 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Yeh...liberals and gays have ruined the beautiful Emerald City. Throw in the fake illegitimate Gov. 'Fraudoire' and her little blinded minions and the table is set....their little utopia will come crashing down someday from being built on shifting sands.


26 posted on 01/28/2006 2:46:13 PM PST by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Shudder! Yet, as long as they quit smoking and go on a diet they can work at Scott's Miracle-Gro. Since these companies are banning bad behavior they should go after this gay stuff, too.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563554/posts


27 posted on 01/28/2006 2:46:42 PM PST by A knight without armor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!

FReepmail if you want on/off the ping list.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search

The good news is change is possible, but it starts with honesty. Homosexuality is not a benign lifestyle preference, but a death-sentence made possible by government neglect of public health concerns. Tragically, Judge Murdock's ruling is another despicable example of a jurisprudence that is eroding the public welfare in the name of tolerance.

The bad news -there is no cure and or immunization in sight. The pharmaceutical companies seem focused on longevity rather than cure and as such the carriers of the disease can in essence spread it around more

The honesty required is that society treat HIV/AIDS like it would any other killer disease rather than grant the killer safe passage under poltically correct cover...

Rather than teach the public how to 'safely' play Russian roulette the people need to be told the reality -how stupid it is to even pick up the gun... e.g. there is no such thing as safe anal sex

28 posted on 01/28/2006 2:48:40 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Such an argument will be a winner every time, especially when the facts are clearly presented.

No it won't. Supporters of same sex marriage would argue, incorrectly, that marriage would reduce the level of promiscuity among homosexuals by making them more a part of normal society. The reason to argue against gay marriage isn't because homosexual acts are unsafe, it is because marriage is about a man and woman. Anything else is not a marriage and should not be legitimized by the state.

29 posted on 01/28/2006 2:54:19 PM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
This, and your description in post #6...

And they want to call those opposed to homosexuality the ones with the "disorder?"

Yes, please pass me your bucket.

30 posted on 01/28/2006 3:02:52 PM PST by kstewskis ("There you go again..." R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
That liberty is costing me a bundle. My company decided to recognize "domestic partners" and extend health insurance benefits.

Are you allowed to "opt out" and find coverage on your own?

It might be worth looking into, and cheaper than being in with a group with high risk to disease.

31 posted on 01/28/2006 3:05:54 PM PST by kstewskis ("There you go again..." R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PaxMacian
Why am I penalized for not having a partner?

A fictitious partner to gain financial gain is created by a Government directive and in the long run loses revenue for the government and loses revenue for the population for it is inherent in creating a political skimming of finances.

Political motivation is the only gainful scenario by such a penalty.

32 posted on 01/28/2006 3:14:43 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The stench from the bench is making me clench. -- M. Savage

This judge is obviously as mentally ill as the people she ruled in favor of.


33 posted on 01/28/2006 3:16:55 PM PST by oneofmany (Proud to be intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Casloy
The reason to argue against gay marriage isn't because homosexual acts are unsafe, it is because marriage is about a man and woman. Anything else is not a marriage and should not be legitimized by the state.

Well stated Casloy.

34 posted on 01/28/2006 3:18:28 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Perhaps time has arrived for a Constitutional definition of marriage.

I notice that the author avoided the word "gay" when referring to homosexuals. I like the choice of words.

I also wonder about the choice of words when we hear about infected homosexuals described as AIDS "victims". Not meaning to be disrespectful; however, aren't homosxuals actually AIDS volunteers?

.

35 posted on 01/28/2006 3:18:55 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Those who are immune compromised due to HIV are walking petri dishes of diseases that the rest of us can and do get. Besides that, these immune compromised individuals lead lives that put them in contact with MANY other individuals who are also immune compromised and also carrying some very nasty communicable diseases.

As a health professional I am especially concerned about the spread of multi-drug resistant TB.
36 posted on 01/28/2006 3:53:28 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kstewskis
I could opt out. I'm paying $208 every two weeks, plus $1500 per person per year minimum co-pay. I rarely get sick. Last time I did get sick, the trip turned into an immediate $1500 bill.

The group coverage is just slightly better than jumping ship. I have very few choices in southeast Idaho. It would be a a "no brainer" if I was still in the San Diego area. My limited choice just happens to be the one whacked by adding "domestic partners".

37 posted on 01/28/2006 3:54:47 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It makes me sick just reading about this $#!t.


38 posted on 01/28/2006 6:44:55 PM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vimto
Rum. sodomy and the lash

YEAH BABY!!! YEAH!!!

39 posted on 01/28/2006 6:49:20 PM PST by Angus MacGregor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
The group coverage is just slightly better than jumping ship. I have very few choices in southeast Idaho.

What a shame, and a cruel imposition. So many people, who've said that "gay marriage" (or "domestic partnership", as in your case) wouldn't effect them, didn't think of their pocket book when they pay their insurance premiums.

Are they going to be in a rude awakening soon, as if our health insurance premiums weren't already obnoxious enough.

Good luck to you.

40 posted on 01/28/2006 7:35:58 PM PST by kstewskis ("There you go again..." R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson