Homosexuality: A public health disaster

WorldNetDaily ^ | 1/28/06 | David Bass

[gidget7]

So very true!! And these same people are working in our hospitals, restaurants, grocery stores, and every other field where fluid and blood are a risk to the public health. Hep B, lives on surfaces for 10 days, unless straight bleach is applied. How many hotels do you know that use that when cleaning...........the entire room! We won't go into parasites that can be found there. And anywhere else they go.

The judicial tyrants are putting the public at risk, every single day in so many ways they can't be counted. As are the Democrats/Libs

[MillerCreek]

"...The decision, handed down Jan. 20, claimed that Family Law §2-201 unfairly abridged the fundamental marriage rights of the nine homosexual couples who filed the lawsuit..."

"Unfairly"?

"abridged the fundamental MARRIAGE RIGHTS of...homosexual COUPLES..."?

I'm just a poor layperson here but as to my understanding of law, does not there have to be a PRECEDENT upon which a decision such as this is based? And where is that if there even IS one? I so far have not ever heard of any popular vote that agreed to "marriage rights" of/for "homosexual couples" that could even be "abriged", much less were abriged. And what represents "unfairly" as to how those nonexistent "marriage rights" for these "homosexual couples" were "abriged"?

This sort of nonsense is exactly why this WOMAN ("judge") and those similar set into stone the awful stereotypes about women and women's stereotypical "inability to reason logically". Because THIS ONE certainly can't and yet, there she is, "judging" away.

And yet, such a decision she's wrought! Can anything be any more NON sensical than what she's done here? Overthrown the decision determine by THE VOTERS by mere subjective distemper? Please, a larger group of very potent and intelligent attorneys, please sue whoever it takes to set this aright.