Posted on 01/26/2006 11:12:58 PM PST by Fruit of the Spirit
Allah 's apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' (Hadith 4:52:196*)
Islam's Intent: Force or Persuasion Islam’s number one priority is to make all the world Islam, either by persuasion or force, and during his term, President Clinton provided both by weakening our defenses and surrendering our children in public school without a whimper. "Negotiations for peace" would be better described as laying down dead.
Each time America suffered a terrorist attack, President Clinton issued statements promising to "find the terrorists" only to: pardon 16 terrorists convicted of executing 130 bombings; refuse delivery of Osama bin Laden from the Sudan; repeatedly refuse detailed information about al-Qaeda and Osama between terrorist bombings; shut down investigations of Islamic charities; radically downsize our military and gut the CIA. (1) (Details)
Battleground: Public School So just what DID President Clinton do? He "negotiated." Evidence shows Clinton cut a deal with Islamic leaders to legalize and protect Muslim indoctrination in our public schools. If Clinton could give Islam the conversion of our youth, Islam's resolve to destroy America would be appeased.
(Excerpt) Read more at blessedcause.org ...
Ping
Back to Blessed Cause
Please feel free to copy or post without permission*
A Message from God
God's passion for you, it's all about you!
BlessedCause and Politics
Stand up against Sex Ed Porn in public school
News Coverage of Islam in Public Schools
Woe to ACLU and NEA Teachers Union
Christ Abandoned, answer the call to sign petition links, be counted!
Links Page
Home
Main Index
Featured Items 2
Forgive us, Vietnam Vets & thank you!
John Walker Lindh & California school proselytizing
Across the Centuries & other textbook reviews
What's In the Koran? Quran
Islam proselytized in Public School
Homeschool or Public School
Militant Terrorist Islam
About us / Contact us
How Clinton Sold
Our Children to Islam
Much of this post researched and confirmed by Wes Vernon of NewsMax
and portions by Paul Sperry of WND. Sources thoroughly provided
Allah 's apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' (Hadith 4:52:196*)
Islam's Intent: Force or Persuasion
Islam’s number one priority is to make all the world Islam, either by persuasion or force, and during his term, President Clinton provided both by weakening our defenses and surrendering our children in public school without a whimper. "Negotiations for peace" would be better described as laying down dead.
Each time America suffered a terrorist attack, President Clinton issued statements promising to "find the terrorists" only to: pardon 16 terrorists convicted of executing 130 bombings; refuse delivery of Osama bin Laden from the Sudan; repeatedly refuse detailed information about al-Qaeda and Osama between terrorist bombings; shut down investigations of Islamic charities; radically downsize our military and gut the CIA. (1) (Details)
Robert Baer, a 21 year veteran of the CIA’s Directorate of Operations states:
"Whether it was Osama bin Laden, Yasir Arafat, Iranian terrorism, Saddam Hussein, or any of the other evils that so threaten the world, the Clinton administration seemed determined to sweep them all under the carpet."(1)
Battleground: Public School
So just what DID President Clinton do? He "negotiated." Evidence shows Clinton cut a deal with Islamic leaders to legalize and protect Muslim indoctrination in our public schools. If Clinton could give Islam the conversion of our youth, Islam's resolve to destroy America would be appeased.
This was a tricky business with secular groups campaigning to strip all reference to the Bible and Christianity from schools. Therefore Clinton colluded with secular and religious-sounding groups and based his new Presidential Guidelines (2) on a document drafted by the American Muslim Council, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the ACLU which owns the copyright and many of the very groups attempting to censor Christianity today. This document can now be easily viewed (3) .
In the guidelines, every single "religious expression" that opens the door for Islam came equipped with a clause of escape, (2a) a backdoor for the ACLU to attack should anything Christian dare enter public schools under the same guidelines as Islam employs.
Clinton then presented these guidelines as originally drafted by "35 religious groups" and named it "Religious Expression in Public School. "Clinton failed to inform us, however, that these particular "religious groups" share a commitment to separation of church and state, as stated on the ACLU original draft. America, tired of censorship of Christian faith and noting the support of "35 religious groups", gratefully accepted these guidelines, only to wonder why Christianity is continuously outlawed while Muslim indoctrination overwhelms our schools, including children praying to Allah, memorizing the Quran and fasting for Ramadan.
Clinton included assurance that all students would be coerced to attend their Muslim lessons. He went beyond the American Muslim Council/ACLU's guidelines and added a clause stripping us of parental rights and religious freedom:
"Students generally do not have a Federal right to be excused from lessons that may be inconsistent with their religious beliefs or practices."
That explains why parents cannot opt children out of these inductive classes for Islam, a huge loss of our religious freedom. It is also why my school district superintendent showed me these guidelines and literally laughed in my face when I pointed out the incongruity.
Clinton's Steps of Betrayal
Clinton met frequently with Abdurahman Alamoudi, executive director of the American Muslim Council who participated in the original draft. Alamoudi supports Hezbollah and Hamas and was recently arrested on 9/28/03 for illegally receiving funds from Libya. Alamoudi was also friend and adviser on Islamic affairs to Hillary Rodham Clinton. Large meetings and events with Muslim leaders at the White House became commonplace, including celebrating the end of the Ramadan fast, (Eid) which Hillary claimed as "an American event." Secretary of State Madeline Albright hosted Moslem groups, where she discussed recruiting Muslims for State Department posts. (1b)
Then in 1995, President Clinton presented his Religious Expression in Public School guidelines, and through his Secretary of Education, described these guidelines as drafted by "35 religious groups" listing eight names that sound Judeo-Christian, educational or patriotic, omitting the other recognizable culprits. Some of these "religious groups" have been filing lawsuits against the Bible while demanding a proselytizing version of Islam be forced down our throats today. (5) Clinton proved full knowledge and deceptive intent by falsely presenting these guidelines as drafted by "religious organizations." (compare both documents [2] [3])
See Clinton's "Religious" Groups Scrutinized
These guidelines greatly impact public schools today. CNN’s Lou Dobbs interviewed Nadine Strossen, President of the ACLU on Dec. 19, 2003. Strossen referred to these guidelines as the authority to support the ACLU’s lawsuits restricting Christmas celebrations and removing Nativity scenes from public schools. Strossen haughtily smiled as she said, "...and all these religious groups agreed to it!"
President Clinton and these "religious" partnerships opened wide the doors to our children's forced "education" of a fairytale Islam, while the ACLU continues to convince the courts to censor the Bible and anything Christian.(4) (4a) Shamefully, the ACLU simultaneously fights for such causes as mandating freshmen to read selected quotes from the Koran. (5) The ACLU and the like issued the rules to go to court with, and President Clinton knowingly presented them as his own "Presidential Guidelines" as he made surreptitious speeches with much aplomb about God. America swallowed it hook, line and sinker.
Cheers at the Gate:
President Clinton’s religious guidelines are applauded by Islamic organizations such as SoundVision, which reminds Muslims it is their RELIGIOUS OBLIGATION (Dawa) to promulgate Islam and methodically explains how in public school today, thanks to Clinton:
"In the U.S. one of the strongest arguments in favor of seeking religious accommodation for your child is President Bill Clinton's 1995 statement of principles addressing the extent to which religious expression and activity are permitted in public school. This was given to every school district in the United States."(6)
Go to Page 2
SOURCES and NOTEWORTHY EXCERPTS
Printable Version
Please feel free to copy or post in part or in full without permission. But if you edit it and change the meaning, don't sign my name to it, thanks. My blessings to anyone who rewrites this post for their own purposes, I don't care about credit. -jent
So Billy Graham publicly praised Bill Clinton for what again? For being a great person? Hmm...
Hyperlinks didn't activate, but they work on the actual site.
My wonder is, what protects the x42's from prosecution?
I am convinced that Bill and Hillary are mere tests of my faith as a Christian.
They may have fooled Reverend Graham, but they sure don't fool me.
"...Schools do more than train children's minds. They also help to nurture their souls by reinforcing the values they learn at home and in their communities. I believe that one of the best ways we can help out schools to do this is by supporting students' rights to voluntarily practice their religious beliefs, including prayer in schools.... For more than 200 years, the First Amendment has protected our religious freedom and allowed many faiths to flourish in our homes, in our work place and in our schools. Clearly understood and sensibly applied, it works."
President Clinton
May 30, 1998
******
Dear American Educator,
Almost three years ago, President Clinton directed me, as U.S. Secretary of Education, in consultation with the Attorney General, to provide every public school district in America with a statement of principles addressing the extent to which religious expression and activity are permitted in our public schools. In accordance with the President's directive, I sent every school superintendent in the country guidelines on Religious Expression in Public Schools in August of 1995.
The purpose of promulgating these presidential guidelines was to end much of the confusion regarding religious expression in our nation's public schools that had developed over more than thirty years since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1962 regarding state sponsored school prayer. I believe that these guidelines have helped school officials, teachers, students and parents find a new common ground on the important issue of religious freedom consistent with constitutional requirements.
snip
Teaching about religion: Public schools may not provide religious instruction, but they may teach about religion, including the Bible or other scripture: the history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature, and the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries all are permissible public school subjects. Similarly, it is permissible to consider religious influences on art, music, literature, and social studies. Although public schools may teach about religious holidays, including their religious aspects, and may celebrate the secular aspects of holidays, schools may not observe holidays as religious events or promote such observance by students.
snip
Religious excusals: Subject to applicable State laws, schools enjoy substantial discretion to excuse individual students from lessons that are objectionable to the student or the students' parents on religious or other conscientious grounds. However, students generally do not have a Federal right to be excused from lessons that may be inconsistent with their religious beliefs or practices. School officials may neither encourage nor discourage students from availing themselves of an excusal option.
http://tinyurl.com/bo2h5
Sorry to be less than interested in this type of stuff here, I'm certainly not Bubba's biggest fan.......but exactly when do we get past the 'it's all Clinton's fault' stuff?
It turns into self-parody at a certain point. ie...it's 'jumped the shark'
Could it have something to do with the 900 (or was it more than 2000?) FBI files illegally stolen by Her Heinous?
In “Religion in the Public Schools: A Joint Statement of Current Law,” 35 religious and civil liberties organizations give the following summary of the rights of students to express their faith in a public school:
“Students have the right to pray individually or in groups or to discuss their religious views with their peers so long as they are not disruptive. Because the Establishment Clause does not apply to purely private speech, students enjoy the right to read their Bibles or other scriptures, say grace before meals, pray before tests, and discuss religion with other willing student listeners. In the classroom, students have the right to pray quietly except when required to be actively engaged in school activities (e.g., students may not decide to pray just as a teacher calls on them). In informal settings, such as the cafeteria or in the halls, students may pray either audibly or silently, subject to the same rules of order as apply to other speech in these locations. However, the right to engage in voluntary prayer does not include, for example, the right to have a captive audience listen or to compel other students to participate.”
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org
The First Amendment Center works to preserve and protect First Amendment freedoms through information and education. The center serves as a forum for the study and exploration of free-expression issues, including freedom of speech, of the press and of religion, and the rights to assemble and to petition the government.
The First Amendment Center, with offices at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and Arlington, Va., is an operating program of the Freedom Forum and is associated with the Newseum. Its affiliation with Vanderbilt University is through the Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.
Executive staff & contacts
Executive director: Gene Policinski
Founder: John Seigenthaler
Freedom Forum chairman and chief executive officer: Charles L. Overby
Press contact: Jenny Atkinson
John Seigenthaler founded the First Amendment Center in 1991 with the mission of creating national discussion, dialogue and debate about First Amendment rights and values.
Seigenthaler left journalism briefly in the early 1960s to serve in the U.S. Justice Department as administrative assistant to Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. His work in the field of civil rights led to his service as chief negotiator with the governor of Alabama during the Freedom Rides.
In 1982, Seigenthaler became founding editorial director of USA TODAY and served in that position for a decade, retiring from both the Nashville and national newspapers in 1991.
Seigenthaler served on the 18-member National Commission on Federal Election Reform organized in 2001 by former Presidents Carter and Ford. He is a member of the Constitution Project on Liberty and Security, created after the Sept. 11 tragedies in New York and Washington.
Gene Policinski, executive director of the First Amendment Center, is a veteran journalist whose career has included work in newspapers, radio, television and online operations.
Policinski was named deputy director of the First Amendment Center in June 2000. He became executive director in 2004.
Policinski came to the Freedom Forum in 1996 from USA TODAY, where he was a founding editor and held various news executive positions.
Policinski serves as a member of the selection committee for the Diversity Institute, a program of the Freedom Forum that aims to increase the number of minority journalists in reporting and management positions in American newspapers.
My wife is adamantly convinced that Bill (BJ) Clinton is the Antichrist. I am equally as convinced that Hillary is the Antichrist.
1998
School Prayer
On the federal level is the Religious Freedom amendment, a constitutional revision proposed by House Republican Ernest Istook of Oklahoma, which would reinstate full-scale school prayer.
Marc Stern, a staff lawyer with the American Jewish Congress, "there was great fear that this would serve as the base for very intrusive and aggressive proselytizing." Accordingly, Stern's group and other organizations challenged the law--only to see it sustained, 8 to 1, by the Supreme Court in 1990. Bill Clinton apparently agreed with the court. The President remains opposed to compulsory school prayer. But in a July 1995 speech he announced that "nothing in the First Amendment converts our public schools into religion-free zones or requires all religious expression to be left at the schoolhouse door." A month later Clinton had the Department of Education issue a memo to public school superintendents that appeared to expand Equal Access Act protections to include public-address announcements of religious gatherings and meetings at lunchtime and recess.
The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, director of Americans United for Separation of Church said: "This amendment will give government officials power to run roughshod over the rights of religious minorities. It is a sham based on the false pretense that religious freedom is in jeopardy in America. This amendment will not increase free speech or make us a more reverent nation...I don't want politicians and TV preachers telling my children and me when and how to pray, and I don't think most other Americans want that either...Americans today enjoy more religious freedom than any people in world history. We can't let a few misguided politicians put that accomplishment at risk."
Says Lynn: "Most reasonable people say, 'If so many kids are praying legally in the public schools now, why would you possibly want to amend the Constitution?'"
******
For Immediate Release - June 8, 2001
35 FREE SPEECH GROUPS LAUNCH CAMPAIGN
TO OPPOSE GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP
OF SEXUALITY EDUCATION
Spearheaded by the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) the groups are launching a public education campaign to oppose the Congressional re-authorization of federal funding for abstinence-ONLY education.
The press conference will feature best-selling author Judy Blume, along with Rev. Barry Lynn, Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State; Jerald Newberry , Executive Director of the National Education Association Health Information Network (NEAHIN); William Smith, Director of Public Policy for the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS); James Wagoner, President of Advocates for Youth; and Geny Cabral, a high school student from New York.
The Joint Statement Against Abstinence-Only Education, which is endorsed by 35 organizations, including the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, Unitarian Universalist Association, National Education Association, Lambda Legal Defense Fund, and other civil liberties, health, education, youth, and religious groups, states that:
1. abstinence-ONLY education is censorship;
2. abstinence-ONLY education affronts the principle of church-state separation;
3. abstinence-ONLY education silences speech about sexual orientation; and
4. censorship of sexuality education is ineffective, unnecessary, and dangerous.
"Abstinence-only-until-marriage education denies young people vital information about human sexuality," says William Smith of SIECUS. "We believe that education is society's greatest obligation and that includes teaching young people about sexuality," says Jerald Newberry of the National Education Association Health Information Network. Major scientific and medical groups reject abstinence-ONLY as ineffective and potentially harmful. "Government-funded programs limit education to one 'approved' message about sexuality, a message long associated with certain religious beliefs. But public schools have an obligation to meet the educational needs of all students, including those who have questions about sexual orientation or simply want more information to prepare them better for adult life," added Joan Bertin, Executive Director of NCAC.
"The purveyors of abstinence-ONLY education say they are protecting children from the dangers of sex," says Leonore Tiefer, PhD, a researcher and sex therapist. "But all reputable evaluators have found such programs woefully inadequate to prepare young people for the complexities of sex in the 21st century. By suggesting, falsely, that condoms and contraception don't work, abstinence-ONLY actually puts students at risk."
Organizations Endorsing the Joint Statement Against Abstinence-Only Education:
ACT UP/New York
Advocates for Youth
American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
American Medical Student Association
Americans United for Separation of Church & State
Association of Reproductive Health Professionals
Boston Coalition for Freedom of Expression
Boston Women's Health Book Collective
Catholics for Free Choice
Center for Reproductive Law & Policy
Center for Women Policy Studies
Feminists for Free Expression
First Amendment Project
International Women's Health Coalition
Justice & Witness Ministries, United Church of Christ
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc.
Mass MIC (Massachusetts Music Industry Coalition)
Mothers' Voices
National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League
National Coalition Against Censorship
National Education Association
National Network for Youth
National Women's Health Network
NOW Legal Defense & Education Fund
Online Policy Group
People for the American Way
Physicians for Reproductive Choice & Health
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
ProChoice Resource Center
Sexuality Information & Education Council of the United States
Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality
Third Wave Foundation
Unitarian Universalist Association
World Association for Sexology
When it stops being Clinton's fault, that's when!
Do you doubt the accuracy of this material? If so, have you checked the footnotes and read the supporting material?
Do you doubt the importance of what is reported here? According to this, although we have to fight for the right to use the term "under God" in the pledge of allegiance, children in some schools are required to recite a Muslim prayer. Is that not significant to you?
Clinton is a treasonous narcissist coward and has done many things to harm this country and its citizens, that's you and me (I guess it includes you.). Do you think it is not important to know about it?
There are still many things to be revealed that the Clintons did and none of them good. In those cases, it IS Clintons fault!!
If you don't like it take your sensitive self elsewhere!
bookmark
Clinton was the President Neville Chamberlain of our time.
read later
This endless Clinton-bashing is getting old. Fault him for domestic corruption and sleaziness all you want, but all of America was asleep at the helm when it comes to Islamism. It's not like W. is doing anything about Islam inside the U.S. even after 9/11.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.