Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

An oldie but goodie.
1 posted on 01/26/2006 11:38:41 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker

A space based nuclear engine is exactly what we need for efficient space exploration. Barring that, a nuclear power source for deep space exploration would increase the power available for instruments on probes exponentially. Unfortunately the Prometheus project has been put on hold so we can fund another manned flight to the moon.


2 posted on 01/26/2006 11:45:55 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul_Denton

Ping.


3 posted on 01/26/2006 11:49:01 AM PST by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

cool.

we were making this awesome years ago yet we're supposed to believe we can't safely drill for oil in ANWR or use more nuclear power for the grid.


4 posted on 01/26/2006 11:52:15 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

And Coors is still in the ceramics industry - has been for a long long time. Their beer sucks, but their technical ceramics rules :)


5 posted on 01/26/2006 11:52:57 AM PST by Tennessee_Bob ("Those who "abjure" violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

bump


6 posted on 01/26/2006 11:57:21 AM PST by NonValueAdded (What ever happened to "Politics stops at the water's edge?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

This is a prime example of "Just because you can build something doesn't mean that you should."

Still, this is how technology marches on.


7 posted on 01/26/2006 11:59:50 AM PST by 43north (Liberals are obsessed by the vulgarity of their lives & the obscenity of their behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
...no way of guaranteeing that Pluto would not become a nuclear-powered juggernaut beyond its inventors' control -- a kind of airborne Frankenstein, a flying Chernobyl.

That would be a rather large "Oops."

8 posted on 01/26/2006 11:59:55 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

This is thinly disguised environmentalist whacko propaganda, designed to make nuclear power seem dangerous in the sheeple's mind. If we had gone ahead with this weapon, no telling what kind of technology we would have today.


11 posted on 01/26/2006 12:04:39 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
"There was, admits Hadley, no way of guaranteeing that Pluto would not become a nuclear-powered juggernaut beyond its inventors' control -- a kind of airborne Frankenstein, a flying Chernobyl."


That's right Hadley. Especially since Chernobyl would happen until April 1986.





12 posted on 01/26/2006 12:15:46 PM PST by G.Mason (Iwo Jima ... 6,825 American's died in the 36 days of that battle. We did not quit John Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Ahh yes, those adventurous Cold War days.


13 posted on 01/26/2006 12:16:36 PM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Major TJ Kong- Well boys, we got three engines out, we got more holes in us than a horse trader's mule, the radio is gone and we're leaking fuel and if we was flying any lower why we'd need sleigh bells on this thing... but we got one little budge on those Roosskies. At this height why they might harpoon us but they dang sure ain't gonna spot us on no radar screen!

Major Kong was down to earth, smart, loyal, funny, brave, independant, and goal driven. The epitomy of a true American.


15 posted on 01/26/2006 12:33:13 PM PST by BadAndy (The DemocRATs are the enemy's most effective weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
For some at Livermore, a lingering nostalgia about Pluto remains. "It was the best six years of my life," says William Moran, who oversaw the production of the Tory fuel elements. Chuck Barnett, who directed the Tory tests, succinctly sums up the gung-ho spirit at the lab: "I was young. We had lots of money. It was very exciting."

Gung-ho indeed.

That was a time when men were men, women were women, and young American engineers found excitement developing exotic weaponry.

16 posted on 01/26/2006 12:49:49 PM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I'm at a loss for words to describe how cool this is. Thanks for posting.


17 posted on 01/26/2006 12:51:14 PM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Bump for later read...


22 posted on 01/26/2006 1:16:14 PM PST by Bender2 (Even dirty old robots need love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Even before it began dropping bombs on our enemies Pluto would have deafened, flattened, and irradiated our friends.

Some people have no sense of humor whatever.

A fun article but filled with anachronisms. We didn't have TERCOM radar in 1957.

23 posted on 01/26/2006 1:22:55 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

There was a plan to use nuclear weapons to excavate for I-40 in Arizona and California


24 posted on 01/26/2006 1:25:25 PM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
If someone were indeed serious about wanting to revive Pluto, he would probably find some ready recruits at Livermore. But not many. What was once the weapon from hell now seems an idea best left dead and buried.


26 posted on 01/26/2006 1:32:17 PM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I thought "flying crowbars" was Project Thor...never heard of this one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment


27 posted on 01/26/2006 1:34:54 PM PST by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
A nuclear-powered bomber never got off the runway after the Air Force started advertising for pilots past child-rearing age.

Not entirely accurate. The bomber was canceled because the cost benefit analysis was unfavorable. Nuclear power bombers were on the drawing board that could have flown around the world without stopping several times. But what is the point of that? Normal bombers could already fly to the target and back at much lower cost per flight hour. The only useful roll for a plane that could fly for days or even weeks on end would have been as an orbiting nuclear platform. Something like a flying ballistic missile sub only loaded with nuclear cruise missiles. Except that compared to a sub it would have been easy to track and shoot down as soon as war started. Subs were cheaper for the same strategic role and could linger much longer undetected. THAT was what killed the atomic airplanes. There was simply no use for them. And this was a SAFE design. It was a closed nuclear system that did not leak radiation.
29 posted on 01/26/2006 2:16:29 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson