Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just my interpretation but I think he's trying to kick Europeans into a higher gear in terms of confronting Iran.
1 posted on 01/26/2006 1:09:48 AM PST by 12B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 12B

Forgot to mention, is in German press reports, only English language article is in Bloomberg.


2 posted on 01/26/2006 1:14:38 AM PST by 12B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

under the armistice agreement germany is barred from developing nuclear weapons or a major navy, even though the technology has been there since WWII.


3 posted on 01/26/2006 1:15:11 AM PST by seppel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

Isn't that the entire purpose of Article V of the NATO Charter?


5 posted on 01/26/2006 1:21:06 AM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

Okay, okay, okay!... But they can only build one, and they have to use it to carry out the order Hitler gave von Choltitz.


9 posted on 01/26/2006 2:08:57 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

Just to quote what Scholz actually said:

"Wir brauchen von unseren Partnern und der NATO bindende Zusagen, dass sie Deutschland auch vor einer nuklearen terroristischen Bedrohung oder Erpressung mit dem Einsatz von Atomwaffen schützen.

Translation: "We need binding guarantees from our partners and from NATO, that they will protect Germany also in case of a nuclear threat or blackmail with the use of their nuclear arsenal."

He continues:

"Wenn solche Zusagen nicht erreichbar sein sollten - dazu müsste gegebenenfalls auch die NATO-Doktrin in entsprechend klarstellendem Sinne geändert werden - müssen wir die Frage ernsthaft diskutieren, wie wir auf eine nukleare Bedrohung durch einen Terror-Staat angemessen, im Notfall also sogar mit eigenen Atomwaffen, reagieren können."

Translation: "If such guarantees should not be attainable - because for such guarantees NATO doctrin would have to be rendered more precisely in a certain sense - we have to seriously discuss the question of how we can react to the nuclear threat of a terror state, in case of emergency even with own nuclear weapons."


11 posted on 01/26/2006 2:30:49 AM PST by wolf78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

Germany should be no more allowed to have nukes than Iran. They have conclusively demonstrated in so many ways that Germany simply cannot be trusted with that kind of power.


23 posted on 01/26/2006 3:27:50 AM PST by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

in reality, how many steps does germany have to take to assemble a nuke? I would assume it is days for them, if not a few weeks.


29 posted on 01/26/2006 4:35:13 AM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

Why would Nato not offer such guarantees? Seems like that ought to be a gimmee.


41 posted on 01/26/2006 5:01:40 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B
If Iran or N. Korea are the reason for other nations wanting nukes, then take care of these and other rogue regimes now and there will be no need for deterrents.
44 posted on 01/26/2006 5:17:24 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

Maybe they can buy 'em from Iran?


47 posted on 01/26/2006 5:31:05 AM PST by sono (Ted Kennedy's naming his dog Splash is like Jack Abramoff naming his dog Bribe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

I guess he's serious, but "Germans and Nuclear Weapons" sounds more like a series on the History Channel or a James Bond retrospective on TNT than a real policy initiative -- more pop culture than real politics, at least to a lot of Americans.


64 posted on 01/26/2006 9:59:34 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B

Somewhere, Leo Szilard is clenching his fist.


75 posted on 01/26/2006 2:21:04 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B
Right now considering that Putin seems bent on supplying every communist and mooolah dictator nuclear, Germany might be on to something.
88 posted on 01/27/2006 3:38:18 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 12B
The easiest way for Germany to obtain nuclear weapons is to reconquer France. Pay off Chirac et al and it would be a lasting relationship.
92 posted on 01/28/2006 8:18:17 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson