Posted on 01/25/2006 12:16:35 PM PST by Dark Skies
At the end of his speech at the United Nations in the fall of 2005, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made an invocation to Allah to bring about the speedy reappearance of the Hidden Imam.
The media and, sad to say, many academic persons were at a loss to explain this eschatological reference. The situation was complicated by later interviews in which Ahmadinejad reported that many of his co-religionists claimed that while he was making those remarks, they could see about him an aura of light. He recalled that he too was aware of a celestial light at that time. He also pointed to the fact that the leaders of the world were watching him at that time with a fixed gaze, apparently unable to look away.
The immediate question: who is this Hidden Imam to whom he referred?
The American media, whose talking heads appear so authoritative on every subject, had no immediate answer. Many of these same pundits watched in February, 1979, as over two million lined the road leading from Mehrebad airport into Tehran during the return of the Ayatollah Khomeini, chanting al-Muntazar.
Khomeini immediately explained in a series of speeches that he was not al-Muntazar, one of the designations of the Hidden Imam, but that he had come to prepare the way for his appearance. In fact, Article Five of the constitution for the Islamic Republic of Iran, promulgated that same year, 1979, proclaimed that the basis for the constitution and its government was the authority of the Hidden Imam.
Moreover, the constitution promised that it would dissolve in his favor, following the Hidden Imams re-appearance.
The IRI (Islamic Republic of Iran) is, in actuality, an eschatological construct based on a messianic figure known as the Hidden Imam. With the ongoing pronouncements about the destruction of Israel and the war against the United States, all in the name of the Hidden Imam, it suddenly seems more important to know something about this whole concept.
To begin our overview of the theology behind the Hidden Imam, we have to recognize that the umma, the worldwide body of Muslims, is divided into two main sects, the Sunni and the Shia. The roots of this division go back to the period directly following the death of Muhammad and the conflict over who should be his successor, or caliph. The Sunni basically accept all the caliphs who have ruled as legitimate, no matter their genealogy, how they achieved the office, or how good a Muslim they were.
The Shia differ. They posit that the true successor to Muhammad has to be a descendant of the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet, an enormously important figure known to all Muslims, Ali. As a result, they are called the shiatu-Ali, or the party of Ali.
To complicate things further, the Shia are further subdivided into three main groups.
These three groups are known by the number of Imams they accept. In the case of the Shia, the word for the designated prayer leaderimam with a lower case i is also used to designate the descendants of Ali who were legitimate successors to Muhammad. Of course these select successors are marked with the capital letter: Imams.
This, the group of Shia which accepts four Imams is called the Fourers or Zaydis after the fourth Imam in their listing. The Seveners or Ismailis are known as such for the same reason. The Twelvers are the group which constitutes over 90% of the population of Iran and around 60% of the population of Iraq.
Now unlike the Sunni caliph, the Shia Imam inherited from Muhammad not just his civil rule over the umma but also his prerogative of interpreting the Quran, his infallibility, and his sinlessness (that connotation of impeccability seems far lost today). The eleventh Imam, al-Hassan al-Askari, died in 874. He was succeeded by the twelfth Imam, the youthful Muhammad, who disappeared in 274/878 in the cave of the great mosque at Samarra without leaving progeny.
He is now known as the expected one, (al-Muntazar), the promised one (al-Mahdi), or the hidden one, (al-Mustatir). The theology of the Hidden Imam is that Allah realized at last that the rightful successor to Muhammad was not going to be accepted by Islam at large so he had to be taken into hiding and kept there until he would re-appear to purify the umma and take the world for Islam.
The period of the Twelfth Imams hiding was in two parts. The period from 878 until 941 would be known as the Lesser Occultation, a time when the Hidden Imam was still active in this earthly realm, communicating by messengers. The Great Occultation began in 941, when all contact with the world was broken off. This date has been misinterpreted by some authors as the date of his disappearance. The Great Occultation continues to present and will end when he re-appears.
Media commentators and a great many academics mostly are not people of faith. For such intellectuals, the operational worldview of a people who believe in a messiah-like Mahdi, to the point that they are willing to base their government on that belief, is utterly alien and incomprehensible. Accordingly, the experts have little to say to the non-expert public about the characteristics and implications of a government predicated on such beliefs.
Today, the incumbent leader of a modern nation-state is making warlike and virulently anti-Semitic pronouncements with almost no knowledgeable comment from the visible pool of experts in the mass media.
When Hitler wrote of his intentions, the leaders of the Europe at that time could not comprehend someone saying and meaning the things he said. Our leaders at present seem similarly stultified in their thinking.
I suggest that we have to take Ahmadinejad seriously. I believe that he means what he says, and if given the opportunity will try to carry out his murderous plans. I furthermore suggest that we need to look around for the moral courage (the ability to make a stand on principle) to censure and punish those who call for the killing of Jews and the destruction of Israel.
Have we no memory? Have we no courage?
"I'd like to see Bush toss a little of the WOT money to those Qur'anic scholars I mentioned in Post# 98. Put them on our "Voice of America" radio. Have our soldiers distribute their articles. Let's try to defuse this End-Times hysteria."
Yes. That's fair enough. So long as these scholars are held and perceived, by the majority of Muslims, as respected authority figures who have 'their' interests at heart.
Another option along with the one you mention maybe to build more secular infrastructure within these Muslim countries. Hence, gradually, shifting focus from a society run by Islamic laws to a society practising Islam in a more private and spiritual manner. It won't be easy at all. Turkey, for example, began to do this a long time ago and still keeps very strict lid/control on the 'type' of Islam preached by some its so-called religious leaders.
I also agree that there will always be fanatic leaders and those who believe and follow them.
It's late so I'm just going to answer off the top of my head from memory rather than look things up carefully. I also think that you are asking the wrong person these questions. I am not an expert on Islam in general or on terrorist ideology and their Qur'anic interpretation. I am an "armchair researcher" on the slice of Muslim doctrine regarding the Last Days, just from studying this topic after 9/11. But I'll answer as best I can.
The terrorist imams easily get around the ban on suicide in a number of ways: by declaring the whole anti-West jihad to be in self defense, by simply declaring that it is not suicide but killing the enemy in a way that ends one's own, etc. They are experts at word jugglery to prove whatever they want from the Qur'an and Hadith.
2. Does Islam advocate or condone the deliberate killing of women, children and other Muslims or innocents, be it infidels, even during a jihad? (Is this similar to what we would call collateral damage?)
Normal Islam -- no. But there was a terrorist "fatwa" a couple of years ago that simply declared that any Muslim collaborating with the West was a munafiq, a hypocrite, and was no better than an infidel. Those women and children standing too close to a US soldier are presumed to be collaborators.
3. What do you think should be done to deal with this crisis? For example, should we annihilate approx 1.3 billion Muslims and eradicate Islam? Should we try to convert Muslims to some other religion or doctrine? Should we hold those current extremist Muslim leaders accountable for their interpretation, teaching and incitement of hatred and violence? Should we point out to all Muslims that their religion is one big bogus and a satanic cult?
Personally, I think Pres. Bush is following the most promising program. Pursue the active jihadists and try to thin their ranks, but also try to bring democratic capitalism to the Middle East, and give the common people a FUTURE to hope for and to work toward. Educate the girls, and free the women from the strict interpretations of shar'ia.
I could dream of some movement for mass conversions, but as a practical matter, that is not going to happen any time soon. But what can happen is for the moderate Muslims to get the financial and moral support to marginalize the extremists. And that seems to me to be far preferable to a bloodbath.
If it were up to me, I'd probably throw some money toward the Sufis, and help them try to just convert as many Sunnis and Shi'ites as possible to that much more peaceful branch.
But if we can start by helping the tyranized masses become self-governing and get them to trust the West, maybe after years of communication some of them might learn what Christianity really is and come around. But that would be way in the future. We're at the early years of a long war right now.
Thanks for the reply.
Interesting points and far more practical and objective than a few others I've read in FR.
Muhammed 'Abd-al-Salam Faraj, one of the assassins of Anwar Sadat, wrote a booklet called "The Neglected Duty" which has had profound influence on Islamic terrorism since the early 1980s. The "neglected" duty is jihad, Faraj says -- jihad is demanded by the Qur'an but most Muslims just go about their day going to work and raising their kids.
Faraj goes on to "explain" how jihad is not merely the inner struggle against worldly temptation, but must be also understood as the killing of infidels and moderate Muslims. Muslims who neglect jihad, he says, are no better than infidels. He justifies all sorts of actions against anybody in his way. Faraj's reasoning is completely twisted, but the booklet has been published and republished throughout the Muslim world.
One scholar, Johannes Jansen, published an English translation and commentary in 1986, but Macmillan stupidly has let it go out of print and has not republished it to this day. If your library has a copy, definitely read it. If you have any pull with Macmillan, ask them to get it in the bookstores again.
This thing about the wells gets me. IIRC, there are underground irrigation tunnel systems which many of the wells tap into.
"Faraj's reasoning is completely twisted, but the booklet has been published and republished throughout the Muslim world."
Yes, I understand what you're saying. That's why I mentioned Turkey and what Ataturk initiated there in my post # 101. In secular West the concept of Islamic extremism or fundamentalism is a relatively new phenomenon. Turkey experienced and recognised that long ago, that is why they have been monitoring it very closely for years now.
One scholar, Johannes Jansen, published an English translation and commentary in 1986, but Macmillan stupidly has let it go out of print
Ill contact Macmillan and see what can be done to get it republished.
Thanks.
I have it on good authority that the U.S. navy has the Imam hidden in a launch tube and will return him shortly.
But I agree with you. To paraphrase Mao, "Let a thousand Turkeys bloom."
Kemel Ataturk, as far as I know, is revered in Turkey, by most if not all Turks, as a patriot, a nationalist and the father of modern Turkey. Acutally, "ata" in Turkish means father and Turk is Turkey. So, not sure about the Jewish connection and propaganda.
I'm not for Mao or communist ideology at all. But yes, secular and modern Turkey has come a long way and could be a good model for other Muslim countries. Only if, among other things, a similar leaders are found and supported.
I must leave, unfortunately, as I've been enjoying this discussion. It is Australia Day - celebration and dinner commitment beckon.
No doubt we will have other related discussions in the near future.
A HAPPY AUSTRALIA DAY to you and yours!
I hope some day to make a pilgrimage to Broken Hill, NSW, to see where Mad Max II was filmed. (LOL!!!)
LOL!!
Many thanks.
Good ol' Mel Gibson, put us well and truly back on the world map... him and hoags (Paul Hogan).
See ya.
That's pretty sobering. It's time to take out some nuclear reactors. BTW, how do you think they'd read such an action?
What? Did Charles Manson escape from prison and secure a position in Iran?
Someone check if Amadamadingdong is playing records backwards. Of course, with that muslim music, it already sounds backwards.
Pleased to meet you! Hope you guessed my name!"
lol...the hidden imam is supposedly living in a well (portal to hell).
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You made my day, Salem! Thanks!
The Mahdi does not have an easy time battling the Dajjal. According to the hadith, the Dajjal runs the entire world (except for Mecca and Medina) and has almost unlimited wealth and resources, while the Mahdi has a small but devout cadre of followers; he has many setbacks, but eventually destroys the Dajjal (with help from 'Isha).
Here's a nice hadith telling people how identify the End Times by the moral climate. No, this is not from a sermon by a Southern Baptist televangelist. It is an "authentic" hadith (a hadith that Muslim scholars accept as non-spurious).
When you see that truth has died and people of truth have disappeared,
and you see that injustice prevails through the land;
and the scripture has become despised and things are introduced into it that are not in it and it is turned towards men's desires;
and you see the people of error having mastery over the people of truth;
and you see evil out in the open and the doers of evil are not prevented nor do they excuse themselves;
and you see moral depravity openly manifest and men being content with men and women satisfied by woman;
and you see the believer silent, his word not being accepted;
and you see the sinful lying and he is not refuted nor does his deceit redound upon him;
and you see the lowly despising the great;
and you see the wombs cut open;
and you see he who boasts of moral depravity is laughed at and is not spurned;
and you see young men being handed over like women and women cohabiting with women and their numbers increasing;
and you see men spending their wealth on things other than pious deeds and no one opposes or hinders them;
and you see the onlooker turn his back on the efforts of the believer;
and you see one person molesting his neighbor and no one prevents it;
and you see the unbeliever joyful because he does not see gladness in the believer when he sees corruption in the world;
and you see alcoholic drinks being drunk openly...
and you see women occupying places in the assemblies just as men do and usury is carried out openly and adultery is praised...
and you see the forbidden things made legal and the legal things forbidden;
and you see that religion becomes a matter of opinion and the Book and its laws fall into disuse;
and you see the leaders drawing close to the unbelievers and away from good people;
and you see the leaders corrupt in their rule;...
and you see men eating what their wives have obtained as a result of their immorality and knowing this and persisting in it;...
and you see places of entertainment appearing which no one who passes them forbids them and no one is bold enough to put an end to them;
and you see a worshiper only praying in order that the people may see him;
and you see the experts in religious law devoting themselves to things other than religion, seeking the world and leadership;
and you see the people living together like animals;
and you see the pulpit from which fear of Allah is enjoined but the speaker does not act in the manner he has enjoined others to act;...
and when you see the tokens of truth that I have taught, then be aware [of the advent of the Mahdi] and seek salvation from Allah."
-- The Sixth Imam Jafar As-Sadiq (as)
It reads almost like the table of contents for the latest book published by Regnery Press.
BTW, when I say that thie above hadith "prophecy" (or any other -- say, that fire would fall from the sky upon Bagdhad), I do not mean to lend credence to the sayings of Mohammed. These sorts of "prophecies" are simply standard boilerplate for the genre of "apocalyptic literature." But the imams are having a field day applying them to the front page of the daily news.
Bookmarked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.