Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House race: GOP banks on McCain to beat Hillary
Times of India ^ | 1/24/06 | Sarah Baxter

Posted on 01/24/2006 3:36:29 PM PST by Libloather

White House race: GoP banks on McCain to beat Hillary
Sarah Baxter
[Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:57:52 pm THE SUNDAY TIMES]

WASHINGTON: Republicans are warming up to John McCain as the politician most likely to beat Hillary Clinton to the White House in 2008 and to clear the party of the taint of sleaze.

A poll last week showed McCain could trounce Clinton, the Democrat favourite, by 52 to 36. The 16-point lead reveals that he has a decisive advantage among independents and swing voters.

"The more scandal and corruption in Washington, the better it is for McCain. He is at a high point right now," said Chuck Todd, editor-in-chief of National Journal's Hotline news service, which commissioned the poll.

The Arizona senator's standing among Republican activists nosedived after he was beaten by George W Bush to the presidential nomination in a bitter race in 2000.

However, McCain went on to stake out an independent position on the war in Iraq, which he considers to have been botched, and he led a successful campaign in Congress to ban the use of torture and the cruel and degrading treatment of detainees.

Republicans have found the maverick senator indispensable in their struggle against the blues that have afflicted Bush's second term.

McCain is at the centre of every debate, where his hawkish views on the war on terror, Iraq's future and a nuclear Iran have won him respect.

In Congress he is leading his party's efforts to get out of a mire over lobbying and corruption after Jack Abramoff, a Republican lobbyist, was indicted for attempting to bribe politicians.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banks; beat; clinton; election; godhelpus; gop; hillary; hillary2008; house; mccain; mccain2008; presidentmccain; race; rats; rinoforprez; white
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last
To: America's Resolve

Given that you likely never sent a penny to the GOP or volunteered to help get candidates who are less liberal than the alternative elected, loss of support costs what?


101 posted on 01/24/2006 7:04:00 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

I have a problem with so called war heroes being shoed into office myself. This is why Kerry and the Democrat bunch put so much effort to get these medals. Then you can't criticize them, etc.

I agree, a medal does not a president make.


102 posted on 01/24/2006 7:05:21 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MarcusTulliusCicero
The only issue that I agree with McCain on is his disdain of earmarks and out-of-control spending.

I also agree with him on his opposition to abortion and his opposition to gay marriage.

I can't say I care for him on anything, and while I like what he says about out of control spending, I hate the fact that he wastes tax payer money doing stupid special committees to investigate whatever will get him press.

103 posted on 01/24/2006 7:08:40 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

All politics aside, McCain is just plain weird. He is as weird as Gore or Kerry. Weird doesn't win elections. He would not be viewed as "Presidential" - much like Dean.


104 posted on 01/24/2006 7:22:21 PM PST by bluefish (Holding out for worthy tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The more scandal and corruption in Washington, the better it is for McCain

That's a great campaign hope - "I hope that there is more and more scandal and corruption. That way I have a better chance of winning."

105 posted on 01/24/2006 7:24:10 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJL

It was in effect in 2004.


106 posted on 01/24/2006 7:27:28 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I predict the maverick will not be the GOP nominee for 2008.

Ditto.

107 posted on 01/24/2006 7:34:06 PM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He can't run against Hillary for the Presidency. Two Democrats can't face off. One has to be a Republican.


108 posted on 01/24/2006 7:48:56 PM PST by no dems ("99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name." Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775

Would you consider Condi?


109 posted on 01/24/2006 7:50:13 PM PST by no dems ("99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name." Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

In the "War Hero" department, McCain is certainly no Audie Murphy or Sgt. York!

Eisenhower was not a combat hero -- he was a hero, but as a staff officer who forged himself into a great five star General and a good President, IMHO.

OTOH, Joe Foss was a fine governor and may have made a good or even great President, had he sought the office. Pappy Boyington was a hellofa fighter pilot, and a genuine war hero, but he would have been a lousy politician.

All of them have something in common -- they earned their "Hero" status the hard way -- they worked for it.

Kerry and Murtha did not, and are scumbags for even suggesting they did.

Where am I leading with these remarks? That is a fair question.

I hope that the "Peter Principle" is at work with respect to McCain: I believe he has been promoted one (or more) pay grade(s) above his abilities.

We the People will discover this simple fact and refuse to promote him again.

He should, in fact, retire FRom the US Senate, move back to Arizona and leave us alone.


110 posted on 01/24/2006 8:20:12 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All
I predict the maverick will not be the GOP nominee for 2008.

Me, too.

Incidentally, I am the political cartoonist for iowapresidentialwatch.com , which is in Iowa and run by the '527' PAC IowaPresidentialWatch. Our PAC watches and reports on the comings and goings of the 2008 presidential wannabes. Romney, Tancredo, Brownback, Huckabee have all been making the trek to Iowa to build support here. Below is Mitt Romney and his wife at an event in Ames, Iowa, pictured with Iowa Presidential Watch PAC's chairman, Roger Hughes (who just happens to also by my husband!):


111 posted on 01/24/2006 8:40:56 PM PST by IPWGOP (I'm Linda Eddy, and I approved this message... 'tooning the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Condi....you bet.Just no McCain.


112 posted on 01/24/2006 8:43:14 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
It doesn't matter who each half of the superparty runs. We get cancerous government and statism either way.

Of course the Republicans could run Ron Paul, but I don't find that likely.
113 posted on 01/24/2006 8:48:25 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MillerCreek

Michael Medved fell all over himself today on his show begging McCainiac to run. He couldn't have been more glowing about McCain if he tried. It was disgusting.


114 posted on 01/24/2006 10:36:47 PM PST by holyscroller (A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him to the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I predict you are correct.

McCain thinks he can win without "us" - the right wing Christian base. That alone makes his too stupid to be our condidate.

I'm still very intereted in George Allen - but we'll see how he does in his senate race in 06.


115 posted on 01/24/2006 10:52:56 PM PST by CyberAnt ( I believe Congressman Curt Weldon re Able Danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Aw, isn't it cute how the MSM lauds their buddy? Maybe they want him to be the nominee, but I think he's as dangerous as Hitlary, and I'd never vote for him.


116 posted on 01/24/2006 11:27:50 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if ya don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
White House race: GOP banks on McCain to beat Hillary

Geeze, I hope not because I would never vote for McCain. I do not like him at all and in fact no one I know does.

117 posted on 01/24/2006 11:33:24 PM PST by Dustbunny (Can we build it - Yes we can - Bob the Builder - Can we win it - Yes we can - Geo. W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

I think that'd be exactly the response that such a ticket (McCain vs. Hillary) would rely upon.

'Cause, the fanatic left is going to vote for Hillary, regardless, same as they did for Dean, regardless, in the past, and Nader, same methodology as to ardent supporters (fixed, not expanding but dedicated in their fixed numbers).

Then there'd be McCain who conservatives would not vote for (I wouldn't) and an election that conservatives would be depressed about. A lot would refuse to vote.

Presto, Hillary would win. It's too horrible a scenario to imagine.


118 posted on 01/24/2006 11:33:30 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Grim

We like George Allen. Lived in Virginia when he was Governor.


119 posted on 01/24/2006 11:35:59 PM PST by Dustbunny (Can we build it - Yes we can - Bob the Builder - Can we win it - Yes we can - Geo. W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Yeah, agreed...I think the "McCain for GOP President" thing is entirely media created. It's what they NEED to happen. Moreorless like Deaniacs writing "resistance is futile" all over the internet in 2004. When I first read that, I KNEW they would lose, if not also that they were aware they were losing.

Same thing with McCain, I'm thinking. It's media madness manipulation o' the masses...more of that Massachusetts propoganda machine, no doubt.


120 posted on 01/24/2006 11:38:28 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson