AG Gonzales sets the record straight.
1 posted on
01/24/2006 12:00:39 PM PST by
frankjr
To: frankjr
As I read this, ABC hourly news focused on the students who stood and turned their backs and others who put black hoods over their heads.
I wonder if they would feel the same way if they had been in the shadow of the WTC on 9/11.
2 posted on
01/24/2006 12:04:43 PM PST by
CedarDave
("If I wanted to break the law - why was I briefing Congress?" -- W, 01/23/06)
To: frankjr
These press accounts are in almost every case, in one way or another, misinformed, confusing, or wrong."As are the democrats. Nicely done Al.
To: frankjr
C-SPAN this morning had Eric Lichtblau from
The New York Slimes on their call-in program, supporting their position and raising alarmist scenarios...didn't watch it for very long but one caller theorized that the spying would be used against Democrats because Bush is so afraid that the Republicans will lose control of Congress and then he'd be impeached.
Moonbattery...it's all around us.
To: frankjr
As all the people who screamed that Mr Gonzales would be a bad SCJ I hope they read every single word of this speech and the comments by Powerline - a former District Court clerk in St Louis - and ease up on the choices made by President Bush - they are not all stupid buddies, rather they are some darn smart people.
5 posted on
01/24/2006 1:17:52 PM PST by
q_an_a
To: frankjr
To: frankjr
8 posted on
01/24/2006 1:57:18 PM PST by
Kaslin
To: frankjr
We cannot build walls thick enough, fences high enough, or systems strong enough to keep our enemies out of our open and welcoming country. There's nothing quite like a false premise to weaken a case.
9 posted on
01/24/2006 2:27:01 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: frankjr
An important point: very few of the progam's liberal critics are actually willing to take responsibility for calling for the termination of the NSA international surveillance program. They know what would happen if the program were in fact terminated, and an attack ensued.
He summed up the liberal mind: irresponsible racist hags.
The irresponsible cares not for others, thus is a racist. This is the liberal today.
10 posted on
01/24/2006 2:30:44 PM PST by
JudgemAll
(Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
To: frankjr
To: frankjr
With the testimony of AG Gonzalez and Gen. Hayden the RATZ on the Judiciary Committee should be left with their tails between their legs.
To: frankjr
You go Alberto! You rock!
To: frankjr
To: frankjr
19 posted on
01/24/2006 3:09:36 PM PST by
jonno
To: frankjr
This is all too lawyery...to much legalize about the cans and cannots...
When a country is at War, it is engaged in the Law of Survival. Note "Law of Survival"!
That means that the active authority is to:
1) Find the Enemy
2) Kill the Enemy
3) Capture the Enemy if he surrenders
Since the President is Commander in Chief and his job is to Find the Enemy, Constitutional Law does not apply to the Enemy.
The Enemy has no rights other than Die or Surrender!
When the Administration starts talking appropriate language for this situation, then maybe, the American Middle will demand that the leftist vacate to Iran or Saudi Arabia.
25 posted on
01/24/2006 6:27:19 PM PST by
Prost1
(Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
To: frankjr
26 posted on
01/25/2006 7:46:10 AM PST by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson