Skip to comments.
Country park arrests mark final stages of tree dwellers' protest (Scot wackos in tree tops)
The Scotsman ^
| Tue 24 Jan 2006
| LAURA ROBERTS
Posted on 01/24/2006 7:20:34 AM PST by SittinYonder
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
The eviction began on Monday and has cost the Scottish Executive £600,000 so far, or £100,000 per day.
Obviously, if they just cut down the trees the protesters would come out pretty quick. In fact, if they'd fire up the chain saws, they'd probably come out voluntarily. But £100,000 per day seems unreasonably high.
To: SittinYonder
I noticed that too..
Talk about bureaucracy! Wonder how many certified naturalists, etc.. they have to have on hand?
2
posted on
01/24/2006 7:27:21 AM PST
by
Pessimist
To: SittinYonder
Eight of the 'eco-warriors' left voluntarily after the eviction notice was read out at the Pickle Dirt woods. Theres a great joke here somewhere...
3
posted on
01/24/2006 7:28:34 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: bill1952
Pickle Dirt woods
I'm sure the joke would involve the topless protester. Isn't it cold in Scotland this time of year?
4
posted on
01/24/2006 7:29:41 AM PST
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: SittinYonder
You have the same idea I do. Just cut. Worse that'll happen is they become a Rachel Corrie-like martyr.
5
posted on
01/24/2006 7:30:18 AM PST
by
Hoodlum91
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Pessimist
Talk about bureaucracy!
Amen. I read the Scotsman religously, and the overwhelming size of government in the UK is frightening. Particularly with regards to their national healthcare system, I like to post stories as a warning of where I see our country heading.
7
posted on
01/24/2006 7:31:17 AM PST
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: SittinYonder
The National Eviction Team
Just how many tree huggers do they have in this country?
8
posted on
01/24/2006 7:34:08 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: SittinYonder
I would think fire hoses would be useful for this kind of scum, especially in winter.
-ccm
9
posted on
01/24/2006 7:39:46 AM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order)
To: oh8eleven
Just how many tree huggers do they have in this country?
LOL. With the socialism in the UK, I would suspect they wouldn't have to have very many to form a government agency to deal with them.
10
posted on
01/24/2006 7:42:13 AM PST
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: ccmay
I think this would get their attention:
11
posted on
01/24/2006 7:45:38 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: SittinYonder
Look at that natural skill in the treetops. And they say we aren't descended from monkeys. But who would have suspected that the Scotts would come along and prove them wrong?
12
posted on
01/24/2006 8:50:11 AM PST
by
NaughtiusMaximus
(DO NOT read to the end of this tagline . . . Oh, $#@%^, there you went and did it.)
To: blam; Carry_Okie; Chanticleer; ClearCase_guy; cogitator; CollegeRepublican; ...
ECO-PING
FReepmail me to be added or removed to the ECO-PING list!
Why not send a team to fog them out!
13
posted on
01/24/2006 10:46:46 AM PST
by
GreenFreeper
(Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
To: SittinYonder
Set up some nets below; tell them to get down. If they don't budge, snipe 'em with tranquilizer darts.
It's the only humane thing to do. :)
14
posted on
01/24/2006 10:53:32 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Set up some nets below; tell them to get down. If they don't budge, snipe 'em with tranquilizer darts.
ROFLOL. If it's good enough for the bears, it's too good for the envirowackos!
15
posted on
01/24/2006 10:57:33 AM PST
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: GreenFreeper
"But, four people chained themselves on the ground and another four fastened themselves to a 20-foot high cargo net and had to be removed by force by the eviction team."
This world is full of morons! heh heh heh.
16
posted on
01/24/2006 11:20:36 AM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Best idea yet!!!! That might give them something to really protest!
17
posted on
01/24/2006 11:50:28 AM PST
by
midwyf
(Eliminate government involvement in the environmental religion too.)
To: SittinYonder
The desire to curtail "individual transport" is their underlying motivation. They claim that doing so will reduce global warming and promote public transportation. This is typical of socialist idiots - how did past ice ages manage to come and go in the absence automobile exhaust? Stupid. Anyway, here's one link in which some tree humpers talk about the Dalkeith Bypass and climate change.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/12/329610.html
18
posted on
01/24/2006 12:04:48 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(The plain truth is that I am not a fair man, and don't want to hear both sides.)
To: SittinYonder
If it's good enough for the bears, it's too good for the envirowackos!
I thought (In AK) a .375 H&H Mag was the minimum that Fish & Wildlife carried for bears?
19
posted on
01/24/2006 12:26:36 PM PST
by
proud_yank
(Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
To: dfwgator
20
posted on
01/24/2006 12:27:12 PM PST
by
proud_yank
(Aspiring CEO of a multinational corporation)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson