Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian official: UN sanctions may lead us to seal off Persian Gulf
www.haaretz.com ^ | 09:26 24/01/2006 | Yossi Melman

Posted on 01/24/2006 5:58:58 AM PST by Esther Ruth

Last update - 09:26 24/01/2006

Iranian official: UN sanctions may lead us to seal off Persian Gulf

By Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondent

A senior Iranian official threatened that Tehran may forcibly prevent oil export via the Straits of Hormuz if the UN imposed economic sanctions due to Iran's nuclear program, an Iranian news Web site said on Monday.

This is the first time an Iranian official makes military threats in a public statement on Tehran's recent disagreements with the West.

The news site, affiliated with the radical student movement in which President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was once a member, quoted Mohammed-Nabi Rudaki, deputy chairman of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission.

(Excerpt) Read more at haaretz.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; iran; iranian; israel; persian; persiangulf; sanctions; un; zot; zotiran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: VeniVidiVici

[It would give us an opening - and justification.]

Right. I'm thinking: how soon can we get them to try to this? Let's hurry and get the UN sanctions if we can. If not, hopefully there is another way to get them to "block the Straits of Hormuz".

BTW, the Iranians are talking about their silkworm positions on the long eastern coastline of the Persian Gulf and Hormuz. They are not talking about their tugboats and rubber duckies. So our boys of the deep will still have to sit this next war out.


21 posted on 01/24/2006 6:24:12 AM PST by GermanBusiness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Right.

Let's just get this over with.


22 posted on 01/24/2006 6:26:44 AM PST by fragrant abuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
These morons are standing in the middle of the field holding cajones in their hands hollering,"NUKE ME"!


Why? Stupidity? or Bravado? Or do they already have a nuke and are just waiting for an excuse to use it???.....

They must know the the world would keep the Straights open....

Interesting......
23 posted on 01/24/2006 6:28:29 AM PST by halfright (3 Days post Hanoi (Jihadi) Jane... 2200hrs meeting to urinate on her grave...Semper Fi !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
They've been so faithful to those treaties.

The signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty have right to develop the civilian nuclear program including the enrichment of nuclear fuel.

24 posted on 01/24/2006 6:30:28 AM PST by A. Pole (John Quincy Adams: "America goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

[That would be the problem. If Iran declares the waters of the Gulf to be a "war Zone" then all bets are off for insurers of commercial shipping. A de facto barricade as effective as a physical one.]

With all due respect, this sounds like a DU posting. If Iran declared anywhere a war zone, it would give us the excuse we need to end their regime. One has to assume that Rummy has the entire war plan ready for "contingencies" like that. I don't think we are in a position where we don't want a conflict. If we could even stage one credibly, I think we would. Insurance companies would not have too much time to deny coverage to commercial shipping if Iran declared anywhere a war zone and then quickly lost all their silkworms and the eastern shores of the Persian gulf and oil producing regions to a northern alliance style of Iranian exiles dropped courtesy of the US Navy and Air Force.


25 posted on 01/24/2006 6:30:35 AM PST by GermanBusiness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Time to buy some oil futures


26 posted on 01/24/2006 6:31:14 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Iranian official: UN sanctions may lead us to seal off Persian Gulf



This news should boost $ per barrel in the oil futures market huh?


27 posted on 01/24/2006 6:31:42 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

These nuts have gotta believe that the American left won't allow another war for oil. Why else would they think they could get away with these threats?


28 posted on 01/24/2006 6:34:41 AM PST by umgud (uncompassionate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
According to the report, Rudaki said that "if Europe does not act wisely with the Iranian nuclear portfolio and it is referred to the UN Security Council and economic or air travel restrictions are imposed unjustly, we have the power to halt oil supply to the last drop from the shores of the Persian Gulf via the Straits of Hormuz."

Hmm...maybe the Mullahs need pictures in order to understand...

See, Iran....THIS is your future...and it is one shared by each and every Islamazi!

And you owe it all to Islam! Congratulations! Your Death Cult has given you EVERYTHING it promised! Enjoy HELL!

29 posted on 01/24/2006 6:39:30 AM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
Iranian official: UN sanctions may lead us to seal off Persian Gulf


The alternative title to this thread.
30 posted on 01/24/2006 6:39:48 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Dear Iran - just an fyi - we live in a cause and effect world. Here are two examples of how that works. First, if you seal off the Persian gulf that will probably cause us to unseal it. Secondly, if you develop the A-bomb that will cause us to turn your cities into glass.


31 posted on 01/24/2006 6:42:13 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Rather amusing that the toughest talk we've heard towards Iran threatens to blockade THEM.

Now, here they are, threatening to blockade themselves.

They must feel confident in their allies, the Chinese and the Russians.


32 posted on 01/24/2006 6:43:46 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Why else would they think they could get away with these threats?

Why? Let's see......................

Most of the higher-ups in the iranian government realize that their "president" is a thug. So they encourage his dilusions and spoil for a fight with iran's "enemies."

They've learned from iraq and afganastan.

The US will swiftly topple iran's dictator, with the inside help of friendly iranian government officials, and set the stage for a massive infusion of US tax dollars. Reconstruction means spreading democracy, right?

Sweetheart deals for the exploitation of the iranian oil fields, spreading the love around to "foreign investors" of course, and a new move toward "democratic elections" which will assure those who assisted in the ousting of an "evil-doer" of a powerful government position and incredible wealth.

All this financed with US tax dollars and US oil consumption at $70 - $100 per barrel.

Nah, too far fetched. That's not even a plausible story. You're probably right, they're just plain nuts.

33 posted on 01/24/2006 6:51:02 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Why else would they think they could get away with these threats?
***
For such a time as this!


34 posted on 01/24/2006 6:52:14 AM PST by Esther Ruth (I have loved thee with an EVERLASTING LOVE, Jeremiah 31:3 Genesis 12:1-3 ***ZECH 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GermanBusiness
No, I think he has sort of a point.

Last week there were several discussions on Iran and its capabilities. One freeper thought Iran would make the first move knowing that war was inevitable and block the Persian Gulf by taking out several huge oil tankers and mining the area thus block the shipping lanes cutting off the oil supply causing a world economic crisis.

If you know war is coming do you wait and let others win all the battles or do you cause as much damage as possible in hopes that others rise up and come to your aid (possible exciting other islamic countries to help because of your "victory" or perhaps one of those who will be desperately harmed by the loss of oil might be desperate enough to come to your aid)?

35 posted on 01/24/2006 6:58:43 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
Maybe North Korea is goading Iran into a confrontation with the West. That way North Korea can see how well their military hardware will perform in real combat. Kind of like a quality control check.

Seriously, other than their navy of Zodiacs with machine guns, does Iran posess a significant threat via air, missle and land based capabilities? Would we need to occupy Iranian territory on the easter side of the Straits of Hormuz?

36 posted on 01/24/2006 7:01:41 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Hurry up and get those carriers we saw yesterday refitted! Looks like they will have work to do.


37 posted on 01/24/2006 7:01:59 AM PST by RoadTest (- - Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit. - Isaiah 27:6b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron

You bring up a very good point. The Iranians need to pre-emptively seal the Persian Gulf. They need to cut oil supplies to the West for purely strategic reasons. Shutting down the Strait would also help to prevent a U.S. buildup of forces in Iraq for a land war. And it would help deny acces to the Gulf for carrier based operations. It would be in Iran's best interest to do this if they do intend on conflict. They will also need support from Russia on the north. Watch Russia very closely. If Russia blocks sanctions, or choses to ignore them, we may be facing Russia as an ally of Iran and then we are stalemated. Unless we want a confrontation with Russia. They are flexing their energy muscle with cut-off or reduces supply of natural gas to Europe and former Soviet satellites. I think Russia is serving notice to these countries. If they want energy, they do thins Russia's way. This easily could turn into a global conflict.


38 posted on 01/24/2006 7:08:12 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron

... If you know war is coming do you wait and let others win all the battles....

I would guess that only Saddam was that stupid. It's hard to believe that the next nutcase can be so stupid as not to have noticed what happened to Saddam.

If I was in charge of Iran, and absolutely felt the need to start a war, I'd activate the thousands of Hezbollah across the U.S. and get my Chinese friends firmly on the hook before I took any noticable action. That and double my payments to my favorite U.S. Senators and media allies.


39 posted on 01/24/2006 7:15:51 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
HOW WOULD THE WORLD REACT?

A blockage at the Straits of Hormuz could suspend the flow of more than half of the world's oil to the international market place from the six Persian Gulf oil producers. The choke point, the Straits of Hormuz, seems reasonably wide in the map below, but the navigable channel is only a few miles wide. While that's too wide and deep to block with sunken vessels, it could be mined relatively easily. And there are types of mines that are difficult to either detect or clear. Needless to say, even a one month blockage could have catastrophic results on the world's economy.


40 posted on 01/24/2006 7:20:04 AM PST by Boot Hill ("...and Joshua went unto him and said: art thou for us, or for our adversaries?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson