Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Looks to Increase Senate Majority
FOXNews.com ^ | 24 January 2006

Posted on 01/23/2006 7:45:02 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
A GOP majority comprised of RINOs? Hardly worth it!
1 posted on 01/23/2006 7:45:05 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

It's worth it provided 50 of them are not RINO's.


2 posted on 01/23/2006 7:47:57 PM PST by Nateman (Stop the spin! Flush Clinton again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"She was certain Lincoln Chafee could turn aside a conservative in the Republican primary..."

THAT dear, Sen. Dole, it the PROBLEM....not the solution!


3 posted on 01/23/2006 7:49:43 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Agreed, but will there be 50 real Republicans?


4 posted on 01/23/2006 7:49:52 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
A GOP majority comprised of RINOs? Hardly worth it!

Yes, it frickin' is.

Olympia Snowe might be a flaming liberal on some issues, but she still voted to make Bill Frist Senate Majority Leader. Joe Lieberman might be a rock-ribbed conservative on some issues, but he still voted to make Harry Reid Senate Majority Leader. The party that holds the majority holds the majority on every committee. It sets the agenda. To a very large extent, a Congressman's party affiliation matters more than his personal views. The flabbiest RINO is better than the most conservative Democrat, if the majority is at stake.

Having said that, Dole is dreaming if she thinks the GOP will pick up seats this time around. I'm sure she doesn't; it's her job to predict victory even if she's pretty sure she won't get it. The GOP has several more vulnerable seats than the Democrats, and Republicans had a dismal recruiting season (thanks a whole lot, Hoeven, Johanns, and Osborne), and I'd be quite surprised if the GOP managed to lose only two seats.

5 posted on 01/23/2006 7:53:52 PM PST by Politicalities (http://www.politicalities.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Hardly, but certainly better than solidly Marxist democrats.

Pick up a cuple more and watch the liberal trash self destruct in toto.

6 posted on 01/23/2006 7:54:21 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Once the Democrats are voted into extinction, the Republican Party will have no one to blame. It's a win-win situation for all of us.


7 posted on 01/23/2006 7:55:31 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalities
"Dole is dreaming if she thinks the GOP will pick up seats this time around. I'm sure she doesn't; it's her job to predict victory even if she's pretty sure she won't get it. The GOP has several more vulnerable seats than the Democrats..."

That's incorrect. Of the 33 odd Senate races this year, the Dems are defending 17 or more while the GOP is defending 15 or so.

And some of those Dem seats are in Red States.

Thus, the GOP stands to gain +2 Senate seats this year.

8 posted on 01/23/2006 8:00:00 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Politicalities

No, I also believe that the GOP majority will increase, and I'm not carrying the flag.

The Dems are acting so stupidly of late that they are ensuring a good turnout and support for the Gop.

In addition our fundraising is over double that of crazy Dean.

We will do very well.


9 posted on 01/23/2006 8:00:20 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Republicans have actually improved their prospects over the past couple of months. But it still looks dicey.


10 posted on 01/23/2006 8:03:03 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
where the party has a single candidate, Rep. Mark Kennedy, running against a number of Democrats

A republican named "Kennedy?"

Pull my finger, Ted.

11 posted on 01/23/2006 8:03:16 PM PST by quantim (If the Constitution were perfect it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

If the GOP continues to sit on the sidelines while pelosi and reid make press releases all day they just might find themelves the new minority party! It scares the hell out of me, but I have not heard much out of the GOP lately and when they do speak it is to try and expalin a negative press release from the dims.


12 posted on 01/23/2006 8:03:21 PM PST by martinidon (Bush won sKerry lost and Soro's is out millions for nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

If the GOP could take, MD, MN and NJ, that would be huge. Rinos that vote for cloture can vote whatever way they want on nominations.

As someone else said on this thead, as long as 50 or 51 are conservative, we are fine. Now it would be nice to pick up a red state conservative or two like Harris anything that gets us closer to filibuster proof is fine with me.


13 posted on 01/23/2006 8:05:21 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I wish you people who bash a RINO like Chafee would realize that he is the best we possibly hope to get in a deeply blue state like Rhode Island. A true conservative that beats Chafee in the primary gets trounced in the general election. Why is this so hard to to understand?


14 posted on 01/23/2006 8:06:18 PM PST by Oldhunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Agreed, but will there be 50 real Republicans?

You can count the conservative Republicans in the Senate on one hand with four fingers to spare. They are almost all RINOs. There is one fellow from Oklahoma who is a real conservative.

15 posted on 01/23/2006 8:07:50 PM PST by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Politicalities

Considering the Democrats are forced to defend more seats than the Republicans, in states that trend conservative, with possible pickups in the faces of Steele and kennedy in "blue" states...I would say while it IS her job to act positive she isn't dreaming to predict a possible pickup. Given recent history, Republicans should be set to fall. Yet they are looking at least at status quo and possible one or two pickups.

I'm not a fan of the U.S. Senate by any means, particularly lately. And had they performed better, I think it not beyond reach to be looking at a 3-5 seat pickup. But even as disenchanted as I am, and the complete lack of respect I have for Senator Dole's efforts of recruitment I still predict at least status quo.

Though, it IS possible a few Governor seats could fall. Particularly in New York.


16 posted on 01/23/2006 8:08:22 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

What about Brownback?


17 posted on 01/23/2006 8:11:28 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JLS
If the GOP could take, MD, MN and NJ, that would be huge.

I agree but dont hold much hope for my NJ. Election fraud was invented here. Unfortunately, the votes North of the Driscoll Bridge cancel out the sane votes South of the bridge.

18 posted on 01/23/2006 8:12:01 PM PST by capydick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Yes, that particular comment just endeared Senator Dole to me even more. {sarcasm}

Chafee is the very definition of a RINO. The type of character that term was born to define. Collins? Snowe? Specter? Okay, whatever, I cringe but I let slide on most occasions. But CHAFEE? The man who said he would pencil in G.W.B's father in 2004? That loser deserves to be booted out. I would like to THINK even Liberal Republicans in Northeast would be disgusted with him. They do dislike "conservative" influence in the party, particularly social conservatives, but they DO view themselves as loyal Republicans. How they can tolerate a guy that isn't even that? Vote Laffey!


19 posted on 01/23/2006 8:12:23 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

Jeff Sessions


20 posted on 01/23/2006 8:13:14 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson