Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terri Schiavo’s Husband Re-Married in Catholic Church
LifeSite ^ | 1/23/06 | Gudrun Schultz

Posted on 01/23/2006 2:43:23 PM PST by madprof98

SAFETY HARBOUR, Florida, January 23, 2006 (LifeSiteNew.com) – Michael Schiavo, who had his disabled wife Terri killed last March by refusing her food and water, was re-married last Saturday in the Roman Catholic Church of Espiritu Santo in Florida.

Schiavo married Jodi Centonze. He had two children with her during the years he worked towards achieving Terri’s death.

Terri Schiavo was killed in March 2005, in spite of her family’s strenuous fight to prevent the removal of her feeding tube and water. Terri was left severely brain damaged after collapsing at age 26. Although medical authorities said she was in an irreversible “vegetative” state, her family maintained that she was able to interact with them, and they sought to have authority for her care transferred to them.

On Saturday, Terri Schiavo’s sister Suzanne Vitadamo spoke out against the Catholic bishops of Florida, saying Terri may not have been killed if the bishops would have supported the fight to protect her life.

Speaking at a “Stand Up for Life” rally in South Carolina, Ms. Vitadamo said if the Florida bishops had stepped forward and denounced what was taking place "there would have been such an enormous outcry of support from parishioners in our diocese and from Catholics around the world that my sister could very well be alive today."

Bishop Robert Lynch of St. Petersburg, Florida, outraged Catholics when he offered his only statement during the 13 days it took Terri to die from dehydration, encouraging her family to reconcile with Michael Schiavo in the name of “peace.”

The Catholic Church of Espiritu Santo, where Michael Schiavo’s second marriage took place, is in Bishop Lynch’s diocese of St. Petersburg.

While the Florida Bishops dismally failed to intervene and speak out in defense of Terri and of the value of all human life, the Vatican issued repeated condemnations of the decision to cause her death.

In four different appeals, Vatican officials sought protection for her life and spoke out against the inhumanity of withholding food and water.

“Without the tube which is providing life-giving hydration and nutrition, Terri Schiavo will die. But it is not that simple. She will die a horrible and cruel death,” wrote Cardinal Renato Martino. “She will not simply die; she will have death inflicted upon her over a number of terrible days, even weeks. How can anyone who claims to speak of the promotion and protection of human rights - of human life - remain silent?”

Suzanne Vitadamo warned listeners at the rally about the implications of Terri’s death for all vulnerable people.

"Our society has shifted to a quality of life mentality and has lost sight of the value (and) sacredness of all human life," Vitadamo said. "We now as a nation are deciding when it is OK or not OK to kill those suffering from disabilities."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: balloongazer; bigpayoff; busybodies; catholics; crappypriest; getalife; herewegoagain; michaelschiavo; schiavo; schiavostalkers; slownewsday; thepassionoftheterri; weddingbells; whogivesarip; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: madprof98

When will this soap opera ever end?


21 posted on 01/23/2006 3:08:48 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Blame the local bishop.


22 posted on 01/23/2006 3:10:57 PM PST by newzjunkey (In 2006: Reelect Arnold; Get GOP elected statewide in CA. Halt W's illegals' amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Apparently Jodi is divorced. St. Petersburg Times (a paper not known for accurate reporting)stated that Centoze wanted a divorce from first husband, Scott Blough. He wanted to work on their marriage. The newspaper is rather coy - never actually states if they were divorced. And then she met "Mr. Wonderful," Michael Schiavo.

Michael Schiavo was/is Lutheran although some have speculated that he converted to Scientology.

23 posted on 01/23/2006 3:12:34 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
Lynch may be the worst bishop in the U.S., and that is no mean feat.

Alas, he's several years away from mandatory retirement age.

24 posted on 01/23/2006 3:13:39 PM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

No pictures of the blushing bride?


25 posted on 01/23/2006 3:14:28 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
Someone who is a practicing Catholic please explain how a married man cohabitating with a single woman and having children by her gets his marriage consecrated by the Catholic Church.

He's not married. He's a widower. Perhaps he's converted to Catholicism (someone says he was Lutheran) and repented?

The new wife, however, sure seems to have placed herself outside Catholic teaching being divorced, knocked up by Michael, etc.

Were they continuing to live together before the marriage? Sure does seem something very strange here.

26 posted on 01/23/2006 3:24:24 PM PST by newzjunkey (In 2006: Reelect Arnold; Get GOP elected statewide in CA. Halt W's illegals' amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Isn't there a part in the interview or paperwork that asks if you knew the person while still married to a previous spouse? I forget what the term is, but there is term describing it, and the priest is supposed to investigate or question further in this situation.


27 posted on 01/23/2006 3:25:40 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Hunh. On Saturday January 21, St. Pete Times says they got a license on Friday with an undisclosed wedding date. Big secret.

http://www.sptimes.com/2006/01/21/Tampabay/Storm_over__Schiavo_t.shtml

Then on Monday LifeSite says the marriage happened on Saturday. And they know which church. And nothing in the MSM. Hunh.


28 posted on 01/23/2006 3:26:07 PM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
Someone who is a practicing Catholic please explain how a married man cohabitating with a single woman and having children by her gets his marriage consecrated by the Catholic Church.
---
It used to be called "making an honest woman of her" and why should the church object? Better late than never.
29 posted on 01/23/2006 3:27:25 PM PST by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
When will this soap opera ever end?

Nope. The "Michael murdered Terri" contingent will be the Nazi Hunters of this soap opera. They'll keep it alive.

30 posted on 01/23/2006 3:28:00 PM PST by newzjunkey (In 2006: Reelect Arnold; Get GOP elected statewide in CA. Halt W's illegals' amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Hey, no simple answers allowed. ;)


31 posted on 01/23/2006 3:28:13 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Mike and Jodi lived together for many years prior to their wedding and had two children. Mike refused to divorce Terri even though he claimed she was no longer alive.


32 posted on 01/23/2006 3:29:50 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
As a practicing Catholic - just returned from the March for Life in DC - this defies explanation, other than it is repulsive and disgusting.
33 posted on 01/23/2006 3:34:24 PM PST by incredulous joe ("I never gave anyone Hell. I simply told the truth and they thought it was Hell!" - Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

And to all, thanks for your responses. In my church, one who violates the sanctity of a current marriage cannot have the new marriage consecrated by the church. And those who go through the repentance process must show fruits meet for repentance for at least a year. Under circumstances such as this, the couple would be married by the church official but only civilly until they have repented fully and shown true penance. Then a church ceremony would consecrate the marriage. Some friends of mine are going through this process. She was pregnant so they were married civilly by the church authority and, if all goes well, they can have the marriage consecrated in a few more months.

I will assume that the local church followed the proper process in this case. I won't judge. (And I didn't know Michael wasn't Catholic.)

Good for the kids, I guess. I hope all goes well for this second marriage but I wouldn't make any bets on it.


34 posted on 01/23/2006 3:38:54 PM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 8mmMauser; floriduh voter; amdgmary; TheSpottedOwl; Ohioan from Florida

fyi -


35 posted on 01/23/2006 3:39:01 PM PST by presently no screen name (PRAY FOR A CONSERVATIVE WIN FOR CANADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
I just hope this new wife knows what she is getting into with Mr. Schiavo.
36 posted on 01/23/2006 3:48:58 PM PST by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ikka

If the new bride was previously married, she no doubt received an annulment from the tribunal of the diocese of St. Petersburg. The annulment process in general is just a joke, so that would certainly go perfectly with the whole sordid scenario here.


37 posted on 01/23/2006 3:55:53 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: madprof98; presently no screen name
Pinged from Terri January Dailies

8mm

38 posted on 01/23/2006 4:17:13 PM PST by 8mmMauser (Jezu, ufam Tobie!..Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: alisasny; Coleus; firebrand; StarFan; NautiNurse

Outrageous! >:-(


39 posted on 01/23/2006 4:19:22 PM PST by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Your suspicion is well founded. The place was swarming with them when Terri was killed. Judge Greer's courthouse sits right there, and Scientologybots would come demonstrate on behalf of Mikey, our new bridegroom, just a few miles south from their Clearwater stronghold.


40 posted on 01/23/2006 4:20:05 PM PST by 8mmMauser (Jezu, ufam Tobie!..Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson