Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAN BLASTS 'SHAMEFUL' CHIRAC NUCLEAR WARNING
The Tocqueville Connection ^ | 22 January 2006 | The Tocqueville Connection

Posted on 01/22/2006 3:51:41 PM PST by Cornpone

TEHRAN, Jan 22, 2006 (AFP) - French President Jacques Chirac came under attack in Iran Sunday after warning that France could use nuclear arms against state sponsors of terrorism, with officials in the Islamic republic branding the remark "shameful" and "unacceptable".

"It is shameful for the people of France that their president brandishes atomic weapons on the pretext of fighting terrorism," said Gholam Ali Hadad-Adel, speaker of Iran's right-wing parliament.

On Thursday, Chirac for the first time raised the threat of a nuclear strike on any state that launches "terrorist" attacks against France.

Although he did not single out any country, the warning could be intrepreted as including Iran -- frequently accused of sponsoring terrorism and under pressure over its disputed nuclear programme.

But Hadad-Adel said the French president was merely "trying to restore the prestige of France after the recent unrest, when young people took to the streets and torched hundreds of cars every night."

"The French need to make an effort to remove the shame of the the massacre of millions of Algerians, France's support for Saddam Hussein and the massacres in Africa and Rwanda," Hadad-Adel said in a speech to deputies carried by state radio.

Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi, in a statement carried by the official news agency IRNA, also branded Chirac's comments as "unacceptable and unjustifiable".

"These statements redouble public concern in countries of the world which face those countries in possession of nuclear weapons," Asefi was quoted as saying.

Iran is currently at loggerheads with France, with Paris at the forefront of Western efforts to prevent the Islamic republic from acquiring nuclear technology that could be diverted to making weapons of mass destruction.

France, along with Britain and Germany and backed by the United States, is now leading a push for Iran to be referred to the UN Security Council.

Iran has denounced the mounting pressure, arguing it only wants to generate electricity and that this is a right for any signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

An editorial by the hardline Jomhuri Islami newspaper argued that Chirac's warning was a sign of the double standards Iran has long complained about.

It said Chirac had defied the NPT and calls for nuclear disarmament, and said France "has no right to be a member of world's nuclear club or comment on other countries".

"His remarks mean the French government would use the atomic bomb to oppress the ones who seek liberty," the paper said in a comment that could be seen as alluding to Iran's support for Palestinian militants.

"Everybody knows they label anyone who opposes their exploitative and colonial demands as terrorists, and that any country sheltering such people and supports them is named a supporter of terorists," the paper wrote.

"(Chirac) has unveiled the true face of the West," it said, asking why Iran should "still wait for negotiations" over its own nuclear programme.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: chirac; france; frenchnukes; iran; jihadineurope; nucleararms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2006 3:51:43 PM PST by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
"It is shameful for the people of France that their president brandishes atomic weapons on the pretext of fighting terrorism,"

Says the country that has been publicly calling for the nuclear incineration of Israel for at least a decade.

2 posted on 01/22/2006 3:53:42 PM PST by denydenydeny ("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
"It is shameful for the people of France that their president brandishes atomic weapons on the pretext of fighting terrorism," said Gholam Ali Hadad-Adel, speaker of Iran's right-wing parliament.

These clowns apparently actually think they have some God-given right to conduct terrorist acts without any consequences or anybody having any sort of a right to be unhappy about it.

3 posted on 01/22/2006 3:55:49 PM PST by darkocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Well, they picked the right country to pick on. They're probably cranking up the white flag production first thing tomorrow morning.


4 posted on 01/22/2006 3:56:12 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Hell, I was as surprised as Iran with Chirac! Somebody steal their white flags?


5 posted on 01/22/2006 3:57:24 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

If the Palestinians vote Hamas in as their government, does this mean they are a state sponsoring terrorism?


6 posted on 01/22/2006 4:01:10 PM PST by RTINSC (I Get Plenty of Healthy Exercise Lighting My Cigarettes..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Iran leadership thinks it's shameful if France goes on the record, but it's perfectly okay if they go on the record against Israel.

If Iran leadership should pull anything, they're in for a very big surprise.



7 posted on 01/22/2006 4:03:07 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Geez, the same mistake twice...

"Iran's" fooseball... LOL


8 posted on 01/22/2006 4:04:30 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

You mean to tell me France hasn't surrendered to Iran yet!!!


9 posted on 01/22/2006 4:09:43 PM PST by chainsaw ( ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - H. Clinton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
in effort to remove the shame of ...France's support for Saddam Hussein ...

Somebody didn't read the DNC talking points memo that was faxed to Tehran.

But whats this other bit in the article that France is at the forefront of this confrontation with Tehran ? Good Grief.
10 posted on 01/22/2006 4:10:40 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Well,
Looks like Chirac is on our side now whether he likes it or not.
Reminds me of that short kid that used to hang out with Kid Rock...


11 posted on 01/22/2006 4:11:45 PM PST by FunkyZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Normal4me

I actually think it was a great move by France. The US would side with France any day over these terrorist zealots. They need to understand if you attack the west with WMD you will cease to exist.


12 posted on 01/22/2006 4:13:28 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
"They're probably cranking up the white flag production first thing tomorrow morning."


13 posted on 01/22/2006 4:14:39 PM PST by jdm (WWW-WEBMASTER (My grandfather swears it's his email address))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RTINSC
If the Palestinians vote Hamas in as their government, does this mean they are a state sponsoring terrorism?

Of course, but they have already been sponsoring terrorism for decades -- so really it makes no difference.
14 posted on 01/22/2006 4:16:29 PM PST by jdm (WWW-WEBMASTER (My grandfather swears it's his email address))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

The reason France is taking such a hardline with Iran is France knows precisesly what sort of nuclear technology they sold to Iran/Helped them build.


15 posted on 01/22/2006 4:18:27 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Are you kidding? If we do, I hope it is a "Hurricane Katrina" type of response and it takes weeks to get there. I haven't forgiven the bastards for vandalizing our veterans headstones or screwing us on Iraq.


16 posted on 01/22/2006 4:19:50 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: darkocean
These clowns apparently actually think they have some God-given right to conduct terrorist acts without any consequences or anybody having any sort of a right to be unhappy about it.

That's something that's been bothering me to no end for the longest time. They kill our people, fly planes into buildings, threaten us with annihilation, blah, blah, blah, and we're supposed to be worried that we might offend them if we search one of them at the airport or in the subway.

Screw them. Perhaps they should start worrying about whether or not they're offending us.

17 posted on 01/22/2006 4:22:42 PM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

What are we waiting for? We should have attacked Iran years ago.


18 posted on 01/22/2006 4:24:25 PM PST by FightThePower!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
At least Chirac had the balls to come right out and say it.

If Bush had said it the liberals would have been calling for his impeachment, I think he ought to say it anyway.

IMO if the Iranians get a bomb they will send it by ship to another country, i.e., Israel or the US and detonate it.
19 posted on 01/22/2006 4:25:05 PM PST by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!
What are we waiting for? We should have attacked Iran years ago.

Yup. 26 years and two months ago to be exact.

20 posted on 01/22/2006 4:28:13 PM PST by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson