Skip to comments.
Breaking on FNC: Iranian Children used as human chain around nuclear facility
Fox News Channel
Posted on 01/22/2006 10:35:24 AM PST by HHKrepublican_2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 481-483 next last
To: learner
That will make it easier to tell which sites they are worried about.
True. The Soviet Union liked to setup the SA-2 SAM with six launchers spread around at equal points in a large
Star of David pattern. High value targets would be protected by a ring of these sites. In the late fifties and early sixties it made finding ICBM sites easy to find, just look for a Star of David pattern, within a set radius you would find another Star of David. Then you knew where the circle ran, figure where the other stars would be and find them. Go to the center of the circle and voila, there would be the ICBM.
41
posted on
01/22/2006 10:50:50 AM PST
by
fallujah-nuker
(America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
To: HHKrepublican_2
Just bribe them with candy. Isn't that what everyone does, anyway? ;)
To: Clump
What if nobody claims the airstrike? The Iranians will blame America/Israel no matter what. Even if FRANCE nuked Iran, it would still be Bush's Fault, so might as well do it!
43
posted on
01/22/2006 10:51:25 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: HHKrepublican_2
Breaking..."The religion of peace assists children to glow in the dark."
44
posted on
01/22/2006 10:51:51 AM PST
by
Prost1
(Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
To: HHKrepublican_2
Maybe they should be thinking about their tin horn president's facility.
45
posted on
01/22/2006 10:52:39 AM PST
by
unixfox
(AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
To: NRA2BFree
... This makes me wonder if their bunkers are really strong enough to withstand our bunker buster bombs...
You can't play around with conventional weapons when the stakes are so high. It will take nukes to get a decent kill probability.
46
posted on
01/22/2006 10:53:03 AM PST
by
fallujah-nuker
(America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
To: NRA2BFree
This makes me wonder if their bunkers are really strong enough to withstand our bunker buster bombs. They're obviously worried about it. Someone needs to assassinate that crazy president of Iran.I'm thinkin' their bunkers were built before our bunker busters were created...
47
posted on
01/22/2006 10:53:21 AM PST
by
Iscool
(Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
To: HHKrepublican_2
To: HHKrepublican_2
Sick.
Sounds like they're sending out the, "Bat Signal," of sorts. But not for Batman. For Moore, Sheehan, Kerry, Moron.org, Gore and the rest of the appeasers.
I'll call it the, "Kook-Signal."
49
posted on
01/22/2006 10:54:33 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: HHKrepublican_2
If the feed is aerial, anyone care to wager that it came from and Air Force Predator?
Do the Mad Mullahs remember Osirak in Iraq?
We and the IAF have enough Tomahawks and Bunker Busters to destroy Iran's Nuclear Capability and Air Force overnight.
Then make it rain them and Dumb Bombs for 40 days and nights aftrewards. On airstrips, barracks, bivouacs, truck and tank farms without depleting the inventory very much.
If that's what the Mullahs want, I'm sure that we and our Allies can and will oblige.
Jack.
50
posted on
01/22/2006 10:54:37 AM PST
by
Jack Deth
(Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
To: fallujah-nuker
To: AlGone2001
The Jihadist would strap bomb belts to them without a qualm.
52
posted on
01/22/2006 10:54:59 AM PST
by
TASMANIANRED
(Democrats value the privacy of terrorists higher than the lives of Americans.)
To: HHKrepublican_2
The mullahs that misrule Iran are taking preparatory steps to kill children? That isn't news. Killing children is their specialty.
53
posted on
01/22/2006 10:55:08 AM PST
by
JCEccles
To: MineralMan
I really hope so. If Israel hits Iran, a lot of fertilizer is going to hit the ventilator in the Arab world.
I hope we stand with them clearly and forcefully. With our recent support of the peace process really meaning we pressure
Israel for still more concessions, I'm a little worried about our stance.
54
posted on
01/22/2006 10:55:30 AM PST
by
Mom MD
To: HHKrepublican_2
When they love their children more than they hate us peace will be possible....obvious where their hearts and souls dwell...there is no peace with evil.....
55
posted on
01/22/2006 10:55:55 AM PST
by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
To: debg
The athletes chanted slogans of 'nuclear energy is our legitimate right', 'Death to US', and 'Death to Israel'. Well, now I won't feel so bad if a errant bomb hit them.
56
posted on
01/22/2006 10:55:57 AM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: EagleUSA
It's really unfortuante that we may have to kill some civilians to stop Iran.In the last war that the U.S. actually won, (unless you count Granada) many civilians had to be killed...It's the civilians that provide the the structure for the military to operate in...
57
posted on
01/22/2006 10:56:40 AM PST
by
Iscool
(Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
To: HHKrepublican_2
More proof that we've waited too long already.
58
posted on
01/22/2006 10:56:47 AM PST
by
freedomson
(Tagline comment removed by moderator)
To: HHKrepublican_2
I predict this will make many Iranian parents very unhappy. Just how long they hide their anger and who they take it out on is the question.
59
posted on
01/22/2006 10:57:04 AM PST
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: TRY ONE
"What does one call children at an Iranian Nuke Facility:
"Veal" ....When an Israeli Nuke missile hits!"
Pretty disgusting, there. The Israelis aren't going to use a nuclear weapon to destroy this facility. Use some common sense.
Further, children are children. It is always a shame when children are killed. Your assignment of Iranian children to the class of domestic cattle is obscene.
60
posted on
01/22/2006 10:57:17 AM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 481-483 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson