Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking on FNC: Iranian Children used as human chain around nuclear facility
Fox News Channel

Posted on 01/22/2006 10:35:24 AM PST by HHKrepublican_2

Will post story ASAP

FNC showed pictures of young Children forming a chain\shield around the Nuke Faciity.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: humanshield; iran; irannukes; iranwar; notbreakingnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 481-483 next last
To: traumer
Did Pat Roberts speak up on that subject yet ?

I think you mean Pat Robertson. Pat Roberts is a Senator from Kansas.
141 posted on 01/22/2006 11:19:55 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2
Drop fireworks first and they will run off, even surprising their guards.

Then soon after drop the real stuff.

And if it doesn't work, at least we tried not to harm the civies. :)
142 posted on 01/22/2006 11:20:15 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

The Iranian mullahs aren't religious "whack jobs"...just using a time-proved method to indoctrinating the sheep who can't think for themselves (DNC would be proud!).

Hitler claimed to have religion, but you don't get closer to God by extermination of innocents. The mullahs will suffer the same fate as their Uncle Adolph....cowering in a bunker & taking their own life.


143 posted on 01/22/2006 11:20:16 AM PST by RasterMaster ("Bin Laden shows others the road to Paradise, but never offers to go along for the ride." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Stop the madness.... ;o)
144 posted on 01/22/2006 11:20:38 AM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Uh, I think there was a day care center in the Federal building for employees to leave their children. I Don't think they were supposed to be hostages in case someone with scruples wanted to blow the place up. Since it wouldn't stop anyone without scruples anyway.


145 posted on 01/22/2006 11:21:21 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (Iran: We have to be cruel to be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

The Iranian Mullahs could care less how many American chidren they will kill when they nuke NYC.


146 posted on 01/22/2006 11:21:58 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2
What kind of sick people use children for political hostages?!

The song, "You've Got to Be Carefully Taught" from "South Pacific" seems appropriate here:

You've got to be taught
To hate and fear
You've got to be taught
From year to Year
It's got to be drummed
in your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught

You've got to be taught
To be Afraid
Of people whose eyes
are oddly made
And people whose skin
Is a different shade
You've got to be carefully taught

You've got to be taught
Before it's too late
Before you are 6 or 7 or 8
To hate all the people
your relatives hate
You've got to be carefully taught

147 posted on 01/22/2006 11:22:28 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

Yawn, nits breed lice.


148 posted on 01/22/2006 11:22:49 AM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
The Iranian Mullahs could care less how many American chidren they will kill when they nuke NYC.

I seriously doubt that. I'm sure they will want to maximize the number.

149 posted on 01/22/2006 11:22:58 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker
True. The Soviet Union liked to setup the SA-2 SAM with six launchers spread around at equal points in a large Star of David pattern. High value targets would be protected by a ring of these sites. In the late fifties and early sixties it made finding ICBM sites easy to find, just look for a Star of David pattern, within a set radius you would find another Star of David. Then you knew where the circle ran, figure where the other stars would be and find them. Go to the center of the circle and voila, there would be the ICBM.

OK, OK.

Don't tell anybody but the US Army is sometimes equally "predictable" - and foolish.

In the 1940-50's we built our anti-air rocket sites (many with nuke bombs on the missiles to destroy B-17-like 1000-plane bomber fleets!) - right ON TOP OF the old Luftwaffe air bases and defense sites in West Germany.

So, of course, the Soviets (and East Germans!) knew exactly what to target first.

Then, as Hawk missiles replaced Nike-Ajax and Nike-Hercules, the Army put THOSE missile radars and "not-very-portable" launchers and controllers on top of the old Nike missile bunkers.

Then, as Patriot missiles replaced Hawk launchers and control radars, the Army put THOSE missile radars and "not-very-portable" launchers and controllers on top of the old Nike missile bunkers, that were already targetted since the 50's.

---

In Vietnam air raids against Russia radar missile defenses, the first few B-52's would get through with few losses - even with their bomb bay doors open flying a slow speeds: if they went faster there'd be structural and door damage. BUT - because of targeting rules from the Pentagon/Johnson's White House, the remaining bombers would meekly drop into the same approach line one after another, the ones in back would be receiving 3-4 missiles per plane.
150 posted on 01/22/2006 11:23:04 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Right.

My professor gave a fantastic example that had me laughing myself to death. He said that at the start of the war in Iraq, lots of libs thought it would be a great idea to go create human chains around all the military installations in Iraq.

Until, of course, they realized that if they were killed in a US strike, the "evil, fascist Bush" wouldn't be responsible for their deaths, but instead Saddam would.

Neat.

151 posted on 01/22/2006 11:23:14 AM PST by cdbull23 ("If it's brown, drink it down. If it's black, send it back." - Homer on what's good to drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Concrete bombs are cool.


152 posted on 01/22/2006 11:23:14 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (Iran: We have to be cruel to be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
The Iranian Mullahs could care less how many American chidren they will kill when they nuke NYC.

I seriously doubt that. I'm sure they will want to maximize the number.

153 posted on 01/22/2006 11:23:31 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

Not very bright, are they? The place needing human shields is not the nuke facility but the presidential palace. That's where the real threat is.


154 posted on 01/22/2006 11:24:24 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Yes - I just realized....
My appologies to Senator Pat Roberts.


155 posted on 01/22/2006 11:24:54 AM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
I really, really hate to say this, but didn't the US govt. have a habit of putting a number of federal facilities in close proximity to day care centers (Murrah building in OKC for example) ?

The Murrah building was located in a run-down more or less old warehouse district in OKC. The daycare center in the Murrah building would be considered a building amenity/ employee convenience---esp. considering that most of the employees had a lengthy commute to work from the 'burbs.

156 posted on 01/22/2006 11:24:58 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

It's their children or ours.

Destroy the nuke facilities.


157 posted on 01/22/2006 11:25:12 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

GMTA - see my post above.


158 posted on 01/22/2006 11:25:18 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
Truman was faced with a million US casulaties invading Japan.

I like to point out that if the US was going to sustain a million casualties invading Japan, then Japan would have sustained probably at least twice that number, so the nukes saved Japanese life as well as American. Just because that was probably not his prime consideration at the time doesn't make it less true.

159 posted on 01/22/2006 11:25:32 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (Iran: We have to be cruel to be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: debg

Anyone chanting death to the U.S. is a legitimate target of the U.S.


160 posted on 01/22/2006 11:26:54 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 481-483 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson