Posted on 01/20/2006 6:47:55 AM PST by dukeman
The justice minister of the European Union, Franco Frattini, announced this week at the EU parliament in Strasburg that member states which do not eliminate all forms of discrimination against homosexuals, including the refusal to approve “marriage” and unions between same-sex couples, would be subject to sanctions and eventual expulsion from the EU.
According to a report by the Archdioceses of Madrid’s news service Analisis Digital, the commissioner’s statements came as the governments of Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Poland ruled against legalizing homosexual “marriage.”
“Homophobia is a violation of human rights and we are watching member states on this issue and reporting on cases in which our efforts have been unsuccessful,” Fratti said. In this way “the Commission and the European Parliament seek to make any refusal to grant homosexual couples the same rights as a married couple a crime of ‘homophobia’,” the report warned.
Frattini-- who was elected EU commissioner after the EU parliament rejected the nomination of the Catholic intellectual Rocco Buttiglione because of his opposition to homosexual unions-- has proposed “designating 2007 as the year of Equal Opportunity. The objectives would be to inform the public about their rights, promote diversity and, as a value of the Union, make this goal a priority.”
Some EU parliamentarians demanded specific sanctions against states that do not follow the anti-discrimination law and refuse to call homosexual unions “marriage,” for example. Michael Cashman, President of the European Parliament’s Intergroup on Gay and Lesbian Rights, proposed expulsion from of the EU of those countries that “do not adhere to anti-discrimination legislation.”
“If we do nothing we are accomplices in the crimes of violence that we see occurring in many member states,” said Cashman, who is also vice president of the organization Gay & Lesbian Humanists. The organization’s website says it is at war with “Catholic-inspired homophobia.”
Nevertheless, reports Analisis Digital, these proposals have been contested by Polish EU representative Jan Tadeusz Masiel, who called the adoption of children by homosexual couples “repulsive” and “shocking.” Likewise, her fellow Polish EU representative, Barbara Kurdycka, said the EU Parliament had no business telling people what they should think about homosexuality.
Life is too short to swallow revisionist history written by homosexualists, thanks anyway.
Classic homosexual agenda talking points. Because I am concerned about the destruction of morality (I have two ping lists, btw) I have an unhealthy fascination with homosexuality.
Classic method of shutting up people liberals disagree with. Obviously ex SS men (they'd be pretty old by now and in your photo you look very young, odd...) would be eager to reveal their nasty past, of course. Their lives (if you really know 14 ex-SS guys) would be just an open book to you.
BTW - why can't you answer to my questions? I can repeat them to you:
I have learned from your homepage that you are deeply stricken in the issue. You even have a homosexual agenda pinglist. Just a question - what are your motives to engage that much over a rather unpleasant subject?
Do you have something to hide?
I am 38 years old. Those guys I am takling about are today in their 80ties or are already death.
I am clear about my motives - I am very concerned about the destruction of morality. I am concerned about the dismantling of the moral foundation of human civilization by homosexualists (those who promote homosexuality, no matter what their own proclivities), abortion advocates, porn promoters, and the like. My other ping list is the moral absolutes ping list. My motives are clear. Yours are not.
You accuse me of unhealthy interest in the topic. Why are you so interested in it? You're posting on this thread too.
That's OK. I'm hardly so stupid as to think you would read them or that it would make any difference if you did. My purpose was far more modest. I merely wanted to reveal your statement that "I'm not afraid to read books and learn" for the obvious falsehood that it was.
Agreed. I share your moral point of view. I did not accuse you of unhealty interest. I only wanted to know about your motivation.
That's not a news agency, that's a kind of gay foreplay.
Okay, if I could take a look at some of the books you listed without having to pay hard earned cash to homosexual revisionists, I might do so.
I recognize some of the titles as being homosexual activist writers. Why should I read every bit of screed-like lies written by homosexuals who want to change history to suit their agenda?
You live in California. I'm sure there are plenty of great libraries in California.
Why should I read every bit of screed-like lies written by homosexuals who want to change history to suit their agenda?
Well, you probably shouldn't bother. It doubt it'd make a difference in any event because it seems to me that you clearly have no interest in historical accuracy. Your concern is an agenda and like with most agendas the prism of history may serve either to legitimate or to discredit, depending on your motives. Unless you suddenly discover that you're interested in history for its own sake, and not merely as a tool in your rhetorical arsenal, then I'd recommend you just stick to what you know.
Did he ever make any babies???
I think he molested young boys, like Hermann Goering did.
Why else would all those “superior” genes be wasted?
That's a new one. The Pink Swastika manages to make just about every major Nazi a homosexual except for Goering. Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich, Goebbels, Bruckner, Funk, Speer, Von Schirach, Schacht, and Streicher are all depicted as homosexuals of some kind or other, but "Goering was probably not a homosexual though he was said to have been very fond of “painting his nails and putting rouge on his cheeks”" (The Pink Swastika, p 162).
Keep in mind that by Pink Swastika standards, "probably not a homosexual" means "there's no way in hell we can make him out to be a homosexual with a straight face"...
Oh, and it's worth noting that Goering was "said to have been very fond of “painting his nails and putting rouge on his cheeks”" in the same sense that a Freeper might say Hillary Clinton is hung like a horse. But far be it from The Pink Swastika to let any baseless political rhetoric go unnoted as if it were truth!
Why didn't Adolph make any babies? He liked little boys. Why else would all those “superior” genes of der Fuhrer be allowed to go to waste?
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
In the case of Roehm, homosexuality was one of the reasons used for the blood purge of june/july 1934 but it was more of a practical reason than an ideological one.
He had something on der Fuhrer. Can't be “outed” as a homosexual and a pedophile if you are telling everybody you are building a master race.
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
That homosexuals were persecuted later is also more a practical thing than an ideological one.
Hitler and Goering were both after little boys. A lot of the National Socialist leadership were sadomasochists, homosexuals and pedophiles. It was practical to eliminate those who could not be trusted with such secrets.
A lot of this sadomasochist component can be seen in German officer's complaints that they were not allowed to sexually abuse Jewish women, a policy that was rigidly enforced by the Gestapo and met with severe penalties if discovered.
When some people use the term “Gaystapo” to describe militant homosexual activist groups, they are closer to the truth than they realize!
The Japanese, despite elements of racial superiority within their Shintoism and ancestral worship, had no such restrictions on the activities of their soldiers, despite the fact they also had sadomasochistic tendencies inherent in their culture of Imperial Japan.
Why didn't Adolph make any babies? He liked little boys. Why else would all those “superior” genes of der Fuhrer be allowed to go to waste?
Roehm had something on der Fuhrer. Can't be “outed” as a homosexual and a pedophile if you are telling everybody you are building a master race.
Hitler and Goering were both after little boys. A lot of the National Socialist leadership were sadomasochists, homosexuals and pedophiles. It was practical to eliminate those who could not be trusted with such secrets.
A lot of this sadomasochist component can be seen in German officer's complaints that they were not allowed to sexually abuse Jewish women, a policy that was rigidly enforced by the Gestapo and met with severe penalties if discovered.
When some people use the term “Gaystapo” to describe militant homosexual activist groups, they are closer to the truth than they realize!
The Japanese, despite elements of racial superiority within their Shintoism and ancestral worship, had no such restrictions on the activities of their soldiers, despite the fact they also had sadomasochistic tendencies inherent in their culture of Imperial Japan.
Never read it... don't need to either...
It was met with severe penalties, if discovered by the Gestapo...
But, since you make it such a point to be an apologist for the National Socialists and the homosexuals, what's in your closet???
Amazing as it may seem to you and others of your ilk who would distort history for your ridiculous purposes, the Nazis did in fact believe heart and soul in their demented race ideology. Everything that they did, to the point of seriously undermining their war effort, confirms that this was their utmost priority. Quite contrary to your silly allegation, you are the apologist for the Nazis anti-Semitic race basis of the policy, that you jettison in favor of your absurd rationale that it was some weird expression of homosexual sadism.
EU(PRONOUNCED ewwwwwwww)=warsaw pact
Mother Russia....er....Brussles says so dats why!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.