You live in California. I'm sure there are plenty of great libraries in California.
Why should I read every bit of screed-like lies written by homosexuals who want to change history to suit their agenda?
Well, you probably shouldn't bother. It doubt it'd make a difference in any event because it seems to me that you clearly have no interest in historical accuracy. Your concern is an agenda and like with most agendas the prism of history may serve either to legitimate or to discredit, depending on your motives. Unless you suddenly discover that you're interested in history for its own sake, and not merely as a tool in your rhetorical arsenal, then I'd recommend you just stick to what you know.
Actually, the reverse is true. I am interested in REAL history, that's why I read William Shirer's history of the Third Reich.
If I wanted to learn about Stalin, would I read books by authors who recognized the evil he did and were willing to find the truth, or read biographies written by slavish followers who wrote fictitious praise, covering up the evil?
Since homosexualists (those who promote homosexuality as I noted above) until recently (and even today, some of them) use the outright lie that 10% of the population is "gay", knowing it to be lie, solely to further their agenda, why should I bother reading crap they write?
So your point is that in order to learn about homosexuality I must read pure drivel propaganda written by those willing to lie to promote deviancy.