Actually, the reverse is true. I am interested in REAL history, that's why I read William Shirer's history of the Third Reich.
If I wanted to learn about Stalin, would I read books by authors who recognized the evil he did and were willing to find the truth, or read biographies written by slavish followers who wrote fictitious praise, covering up the evil?
Since homosexualists (those who promote homosexuality as I noted above) until recently (and even today, some of them) use the outright lie that 10% of the population is "gay", knowing it to be lie, solely to further their agenda, why should I bother reading crap they write?
So your point is that in order to learn about homosexuality I must read pure drivel propaganda written by those willing to lie to promote deviancy.
That was actually never my point here. I don't care whether you learn more about homosexuality, nor do I think there's anything that you would gain from that. My point was that in order to learn about Nazi ideology, and about World War II, and about the Holocaust then you must let go of your nonsense and read the history for its own sake. The singular obsession with homosexuality is yours, not mine, and that was never my point.
So, if you actually want an accurate portrait of the history of Nazi Germany you basically need to start all over, because this sprawling web of sadomasochist homosexuality that you've built up in your head is nothing but a fevered dream.