Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France warns 'terrorist' states (Article's quote, not mine)
News.Com.AU ^ | January 20, 2006 | staff writer

Posted on 01/20/2006 6:40:49 AM PST by yankeedame

France warns 'terrorist' states

From: Agence France-Presse From correspondents in Ile Longue Military Base
January 20, 2006

PRESIDENT Jacques Chirac has overnight raised the threat of a nuclear strike on any state that launches "terrorist" attacks against France.

He also said France's doctrine of nuclear deterrence has been extended to protect the country's "strategic supplies", taken to mean oil. "Leaders of any state that uses terrorist means against us, as well as any that may be envisaging, in one way or another, using weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would be exposing themselves to a firm and appropriate response on our behalf," he said.

"That response could be conventional, it could also be of another nature," Mr Chirac said in a clear reference to nuclear weapons during a visit to a French nuclear base in the north-western region of Brittany.

The President said he was extending the definition of "vital interests" protected by France's nuclear umbrella to include allies and "strategic supplies".

Le Monde newspaper said that Mr Chirac's comments were aimed "probably also at those countries from which France imports part of its energy needs".

Advertisement: "If, theoretically, such interests were threatened by regional powers, Iran, North Korea, France would react," the daily said. The French President, however, did not single out any country in his speech.

He did indicate, though, that the previous Cold War stance of threatening massive and widespread destruction against enemies had been changed to a doctrine permitting a graduated and limited nuclear response.

"Faced with a regional power, our choice is not between doing nothing and annihilating it," he said.

France has configured its nuclear arsenal to be able to respond "flexibly and reactively" to any threat, by reducing the number of nuclear heads on certain missiles on board its submarines, he said.

Such a move would enable it to conduct strikes on specific targets and limit the zone of destruction.

"It would be up to the President of the republic to evaluate the potential magnitude and consequences of unacceptable threats or blackmail against our interests," he said.

Such a situation could lead a French head of state to declare those "vital interests," Mr Chirac said.

He said "the fight against terrorism is obviously one of our priorities," but he added that "it is not because a new threat appears that it causes all the others to disappear.

"Our world is marked by the emergence of affirmations of power that rely on the possession of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons."

In an apparent reference to Iran, Mr Chirac condemned "the temptation by certain countries to obtain nuclear capabilities in contravention of treaties."

Iran's government is pursuing a nuclear development programme, stoking fears among major powers that it will be used to make nuclear weapons.

France's opposition parties were split in their reaction to MrChirac's statements.

The Socialist Party, through one-time prime minister Laurent Fabius, said there was nothing shocking about the position put forward.

But Helene Luc, a senator with the smaller Communist Party and member of a defence committee, said: "This extension of the concept of nuclear dissuasion takes us back years to the Cold War and can only deepen tensions with countries that aspire to have such weapons."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: france; frenchnukes; gwot; jihadineurope

1 posted on 01/20/2006 6:40:50 AM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Yes, France has the terror community shaking in its boots...er, sandals.


2 posted on 01/20/2006 6:42:44 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
"PRESIDENT Jacques Chirac has overnight raised the threat of a nuclear strike on any state that launches "terrorist" attacks against France."

Is the fool threatening to nuke the suburbs of Paris?

3 posted on 01/20/2006 6:44:57 AM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Pretty tough talk for a French guy.

Of course he is the only one that believes him.


4 posted on 01/20/2006 6:45:53 AM PST by mad puppy ( The Southern border needs to be a MAJOR issue in 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

blah, blah, bluff.


5 posted on 01/20/2006 6:46:46 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

So why does Chiraq suddenly have a bee in his bonnet? Has France received credible intelligence that a "terrorist" state is rumbling against it?


6 posted on 01/20/2006 6:47:54 AM PST by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
OK... Al Queda pops a 10 KT nuc in Paris and claims responsibility. Who Jacques is going to hit? Pakistan? Don't think so... they could shoot back. Iran? How do you make the connection as things currently stand that they were responsible? Afghanistan? Where in Afghanistan and oh, by the way, how do you keep U.S. and allied troops out of the blast/radiation patterns? Interesting "threat" but not very realistic. By the way, we will have the same problem if al-Queda pops one in DC.
7 posted on 01/20/2006 6:48:41 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Didn't France threaten the Nazi's too... And we had to bail them out then...


"Give us any crap and you will face Frances mighty military... but please don't invade or we may have to give up without a fight..."


8 posted on 01/20/2006 6:54:51 AM PST by BusiDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

..."we have discover a quick way to jump under our famous white flag, and if you nasty terrorist even as much as deploy a party favor...ewww, I hate aaloud noises, we will show eeewe....would you like to purchase a few rusted burnt out car carcasses...hmmmmm?

9 posted on 01/20/2006 6:56:20 AM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

maybe the french will lob cheese missiles at them.


10 posted on 01/20/2006 7:16:27 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
please...

11 posted on 01/20/2006 8:04:38 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Sounds like a dead copy of the "Bush Doctrine".


12 posted on 01/20/2006 8:37:32 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent
So why does Chiraq suddenly have a bee in his bonnet?

It is rather vexing. I know his popularity has tanked and the Anti-American thing is not working anymore but….. This is strange even for the French. I get the feeling that something is up.

13 posted on 01/20/2006 10:11:56 AM PST by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: usurper

We have the same feeling. I just think making a statement that France will use nuclear weapons if . . . is so out of (no pun intended) left field, you gotta wonder.


14 posted on 01/20/2006 2:05:58 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

"Stop, or we'll taunt you a second time."


15 posted on 01/20/2006 2:06:52 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson