1 posted on
01/19/2006 8:33:18 PM PST by
HAL9000
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: HAL9000
If this report is for real, and the Iranians leadership somehow pulls off their first nuclear test, you can bet it shall be their last.
48 posted on
01/19/2006 10:04:43 PM PST by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is Never Free)
To: HAL9000
Hmmm... They're gonna test on a holiday? How festive! Perhaps Dubya can send a few of our noise makers to help get the party started!
50 posted on
01/19/2006 10:08:12 PM PST by
Redcloak
("Shiny... Let's be bad guys.")
To: HAL9000
Hmmm. This story has no details whatsoever. What about credibility?
I have been wondering what the real deal is on Iran's nuke capability is. El Baradei - not exactly known for hawkish assesments of the ME situation - has said twice in recent weeks that Iran could be just months from a nuclear weapon.
Any more info?
To: HAL9000
To: HAL9000
Nope, Iran only wants nuclear technology for their energy needs only.
56 posted on
01/19/2006 11:48:29 PM PST by
Pro-Bush
(We protect Korea's border better than our own!)
To: HAL9000
This is no surprise. Sad but true.
To: HAL9000
That says it all, and it ain't good.
58 posted on
01/20/2006 12:37:17 AM PST by
hershey
To: HAL9000
News came out of Israel with some scepticism about Iran's plan and deadline. I would also be surprised, if it could be done that quickly. ...at least another three-four months after that, in my best guess.
60 posted on
01/20/2006 1:11:10 AM PST by
familyop
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
To: HAL9000
Well who really knows... But this Iranian opposition group does have a very big vested interest in over hyping any threats.
To: HAL9000
If and when Iran gets nuclear bombs, is there still any reason for the U.S. to stay in the U.N.? What possible reason would it serve for the U.S. to stay in the U.N.?
62 posted on
01/20/2006 5:55:16 AM PST by
AIC
To: HAL9000
Ah Shiite.
Here we go folks.
63 posted on
01/20/2006 6:44:37 AM PST by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
..................
64 posted on
01/20/2006 6:48:30 AM PST by
SJackson
(Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants to see us happy. B. Franklin)
To: HAL9000
Hopefully the test site isn't Tel Aviv.
67 posted on
01/20/2006 8:35:31 AM PST by
rfreedom4u
(Native Texan)
To: HAL9000
73 posted on
01/20/2006 10:18:03 AM PST by
indthkr
To: HAL9000
I believe Israel can attack with conventional arms preemptively, but a preemptive Israeli nuke strike is not feasible.
I also agree that the US can not attack preemptively due to the political climate. We might be able to get away with "helping" the Israelis with tankers, intell and air space.
As my 80+ year old uncle said 2 years ago after 911 - "its bad, real bad ...."
schu
78 posted on
01/20/2006 12:32:22 PM PST by
schu
To: HAL9000
I think I found what Iran is trying to do,
they are trying to increase their commodity prices for the first day of trading on their Bourse, and are doing so using
March 20 2006
Thursday
29 Esfand
Day of Nationalization of the Oil Industry
This is an economic ploy by the "mad" president of Iran.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
