Skip to comments.
Syria Backs Nuclear Iran
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 1-20-2006
| Patrick Bishop
Posted on 01/19/2006 6:23:57 PM PST by blam
Syria backs a nuclear Iran
By Patrick Bishop in Damascus
(Filed: 20/01/2006)
Syria yesterday backed Iran in its nuclear confrontation with the West as their leaders met in Damascus in a defiant show of solidarity.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Bashar al-Assad
The Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, welcomed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and said the Iranian leader had the right to acquire nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. In turn, Mr Ahmadinejad asserted his host's right to freedom from foreign interference.
Both men face confontations with the United Nations Security Council. The West is pushing for the International Atomic Energy Agency to refer Teheran to the council over its work on enriching uranium, which Europe and America fear is intended for use in nuclear weapons.
Mr Assad's regime is under intense scrutiny after a UN report implicated senior figures in the assassination last year of the former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.
The meeting came as Mr Ahmadinejad's government warned the West that the world would face an oil crisis if Iran was referred to the council and sanctions followed. "One of the consequences will be the unleashing of a crisis in the oil sector and particularly a price hike," said Davoud Danesh-Jafari, the oil minister.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; baath; backs; iaea; iran; irannukes; islamofascism; nuclear; outpostsoftyranny; saddamwantabees; sandnazis; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-129 next last
To: blam
Mahmoud Hitler Ahmadinejad and Bashar Mussolini al-Assad
To: DevSix
Yes, the true leaders who led to the election of Shia Islamists closely allied to Iran in Iraq, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and Hamas in Gaza. Tell me again how you're helping us win the War on Terror by letting terrorists get elected?
102
posted on
01/19/2006 11:36:28 PM PST
by
Lejes Rimul
(I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
To: Treader
103
posted on
01/19/2006 11:37:10 PM PST
by
Lejes Rimul
(I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
To: El Gato
My father was in the ETO and said that it took over a year to "mop up".
104
posted on
01/19/2006 11:49:20 PM PST
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: Lejes Rimul
You haven't been shy on this thread, as to your pov and per your brandished tag-line. So, since you have kindly asked- no, please present your view here on the thread. Thanks.
105
posted on
01/19/2006 11:54:41 PM PST
by
Treader
(Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
To: blam; nmh; A Jovial Cad; Convert from ECUSA
A suicide terrorist from Iranian & Syrian supported Islamic Jihad detonated his terrorism explosive charge in southern Tel Aviv at approximately 3:45PM, injuring 15 people, while at the same time Iran's Ahmadinejad was meeting with Syria's Assad in Damascus.
Nothing in the Middle-East happens by accident. No one was killed in the attack, but 31 were wounded, 13 of them were still hospitalized as of Friday morning & one Israeli is in moderate-to-serious condition.
Read about one Israel directly in the bomb blast 'My miracle escape'
Mofaz says Tel Aviv bombing was funded by Iran
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad(R) and his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad review the honor guard at Damascus airport. On Lebanon, Assad said Syria and Iran wanted stability there but stressed "the need to support the resistance" to Israel, in reference to the radical Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah.(AFP/SANA)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, centre right, and Syrian President Bashar Assad, centre left. review an honour guard at the Ash Shaeb presidential palace in Damascus Thursday Jan. 19, 2006. Syria on Thursday backed ally Iran in its confrontation with the West over its nuclear program, saying critics have provided no convincing argument to deny Tehran the technology. The Syrian support came at a summit of the nation's two presidents to coordinate policies and consolidate their alliance under the shadow of U.S. pressure and the threat of international sanctions against both.(AP Photo Bassem Tellawi).
Syria-map
Iran-map
Military targets required for participating 'Allied' air forces have already been calculated.
106
posted on
01/20/2006 12:12:33 AM PST
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is Never Free)
To: Treader
Well, I'm touched you think so highly of my - admittedly, well-informed - opinion. It's good to know I have fans.
We went into Iraq in part to ensure that the heart of the Middle East did not remain under the domination of an odious dictator, yet our policies from April 2003 are guaranteeing precisely the continued domination of Iraq by dictatorship, Iranian rather than Saddamite. Supporting an Iraqi government run by Shia Islamists is enabling Iran to become regional hegemon; Iran's current audacity about its nuclear program is in large part because we depend on its proxies and our hands are tied in Iraq.
Immediately after World War II, Patton wanted to rearm two divisions of Waffen SS and incorporate them into the Third U.S. Army. Once the Nazis were destroyed, he never took his eyes off the real enemies: the totalitarian Soviet empire. Patton said, "We can drive the Red Army back to Russia. With my Germans, we are capable of doing it." Get it?
107
posted on
01/20/2006 12:15:55 AM PST
by
Lejes Rimul
(I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
To: Lejes Rimul
That was a great summary of material you have already covered in this thread. My question to you was/ still is- "What should the US do next?"
108
posted on
01/20/2006 12:23:44 AM PST
by
Treader
(Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
To: Lejes Rimul
"Iran's current audacity about its nuclear program is in large part because we depend on its proxies..." That would be EU...
They and the Security Council sway way more US favor than recent Iraqi elections, lol!
109
posted on
01/20/2006 12:26:45 AM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: Treader
I just answered your question. It's not my fault if you're too obtuse to see it.
110
posted on
01/20/2006 12:27:05 AM PST
by
Lejes Rimul
(I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
To: Treader
It's either retreat or engage. Like the MSM, Lejes Rimul got an anti-Bush spin no matter what.
111
posted on
01/20/2006 12:29:11 AM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: wizardoz
"I want to know why we didn't expand into Iran and/or Syria two years ago. Why just patch one of the holes in a boat that's leaking in several places?"
Taking it one step at a time. Need for Iraq to be able to handle their terrorists mostly by themselves.
Israel and the US aren't the only ones against nukes in Iran. In time, perhaps even Saudi Arabia would support toppling an agressive Iran.
To: Lejes Rimul
...you do the hokey-pokey and you shake it all around, and that's what it's all about!... Yes indeed, you're a real hard read.
113
posted on
01/20/2006 12:49:00 AM PST
by
Treader
(Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
To: Treader
Surrender all base. All you base belong to us.
114
posted on
01/20/2006 1:56:42 AM PST
by
Left2Right
("Democracy isn't perfect, but other governments are so much worse")
To: Lejes Rimul
Obviously, age and experience don't equate to wisdom as you have so aptly made apparent. Good work old boy.
115
posted on
01/20/2006 2:21:39 AM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Ask the Lord to make Himself real to you and receive His love today, while you still can!)
To: Schwaeky
I wouldn't doubt it. I didn't know the date was settled on the 15th. I wonder if it's too late for them to decide on the Yuan instead?
116
posted on
01/20/2006 2:23:28 AM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Ask the Lord to make Himself real to you and receive His love today, while you still can!)
To: Treader; Lejes Rimul
I think he's saying we should arm a Sunni Iraqi army to send against Iran.
Correct?
Which is about the silliest thing I've read on FR for quite some time.
To: M. Espinola
I see that we have pictures of the Hitler and Mussolini of the 21st Century. What a couple of rodents! I don't think it is coincidence that the bombing in Tel Aviv happened during the meeting between the 21st Century Haman and his Syrian lap dog.
118
posted on
01/20/2006 5:30:50 AM PST
by
Convert from ECUSA
(Not a nickel, not a dime, stop sending my tax money to Hamastine!)
To: Convert from ECUSA
That's right, this heinous act of highly organized terror was timed in the most diabolical way to coincide exactly with the two Mohammedan beasts meeting in Damascus, shared international, jihadist terrorist headquarters - with Tehran.
The new PM's response to this attempt at mass murder, which did injury over 30 Israelis, must equal the this fiendish crime against humanity.
http://gelber-stern.tripod.com/idf.gif
119
posted on
01/20/2006 6:13:55 AM PST
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is Never Free)
To: extremeconspirator
120
posted on
01/20/2006 6:16:35 AM PST
by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson