Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Dr. Scarpetta
2 posted on
01/19/2006 10:05:47 AM PST by
rhombus
To: McGruff; leadpenny; Bahbah; YaYa123; meema; Txsleuth; malia
3 posted on
01/19/2006 10:07:45 AM PST by
Springman
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Fox News FAIR And Balanced.
4 posted on
01/19/2006 10:08:12 AM PST by
VU4G10
(Have You Forgotten?)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
The little Nazi are trying hard and they will succeed if they recapture congress, just as Hitler did when his party took over the German parliament.
6 posted on
01/19/2006 10:09:51 AM PST by
YOUGOTIT
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Interesting - the lefties are always complaining about Freedom of Speech, and now here's yet another whacko wanting to control what goes out on the radio waves. Bzzzzzzzzzzzt. Sorry - she loses!
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Another reason to flee broadcast radio for satellite.
These people are pathetic.
10 posted on
01/19/2006 10:11:52 AM PST by
VegasCowboy
("...he wore his gun outside his pants, for all the honest world to feel.")
To: Dr. Scarpetta
The "Fariness Doctrine" has nothing whatsoever to do with fair. It is a blatant attempt to silence any public criticism of the left.
11 posted on
01/19/2006 10:12:01 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Ya know--this bill would also affect FR and DU. Wonder how the moonbats over there feel about this?
12 posted on
01/19/2006 10:13:07 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
And of course they have the right to turn it off. But thats not good enough either. The fact is that they need the responsibility of the people who are licensed to use our airwaves judiciously and responsibly to call them to account if they dont.
...but of course Howard Stern, all the "I have a problem shows" and sexual explicit shows are a good use of airwaves.
To: Dr. Scarpetta
New York Democratic representative Louise Slaughter, who introduced the first of the two bills, says that Right-ruled radio is a grave threat to American freedomsThese people make me sick. If leftist thinking were really all that popular, it would be competitive in the marketplace of ideas. What better evidence that leftist thinking ISN'T popular then the fact that it is virtually non-existent within commercial talk radio. So, in order to push unpopular ideas, the Dems want to force these ideas upon radio listeners by act of Congress.
19 posted on
01/19/2006 10:17:05 AM PST by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
New York Democratic representative Louise Slaughter, who introduced the first of the two bills, says that Right-ruled radio is a grave threat to American freedoms, a waste of good broadcast time, and a waste of our airwaves. People may hear whatever they please and whatever they choose, she tells PBSs Bill Moyers, in a statement as incoherent as it is illiberal.
And CNNBCBSABC are not a waste of broadcast time and our airwaves?
We can't have the people, who after all own the airwaves, not this boneheaded legislator, being satisfied. These are prime examples of the dimwits in our Congress!
23 posted on
01/19/2006 10:20:43 AM PST by
Rummyfan
To: Dr. Scarpetta
This could never fly on cable television (ie. Foxnews) because of first amendment issues. It only works on radio and broadcast television because the airwaves these entities use are considered limited public property and subject to public regulation. This doesn't apply to cable and satellite broadcasts. In the past this doctrine proved unworkable and most broadcasters ended up avoiding any political or social issues for fear of being labeled biased by the FCC.
24 posted on
01/19/2006 10:20:51 AM PST by
joebuck
To: Dr. Scarpetta
I thought this must have been posted by Scrappleface. Surely they can't be serious!
28 posted on
01/19/2006 10:21:59 AM PST by
mlc9852
To: Dr. Scarpetta
If the Dems take back Congress or the White House, watch out. Nothing would please them more than to drag the country back to the good old days, when liberals didnt have to put up with Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham and Bill OReilly and Matt Drudge and the countless other upstarts recasting our public debate. Yes, go ahead and try. Conservative talk radio is an established institution. The Rats would see a repeat of the slaughter they got in the 1994 midterm elections.
To: Dr. Scarpetta
typical liberal (dem) doublespeak:
when they say the following:
may hear whatever they please and whatever they choose,
...
"And of course they have the right to turn it off. But thats not good enough either. The fact is that they need the responsibility of the people who are licensed to use our airwaves judiciously and responsibly to call them to account if they dont.
then they've just said "BUT" in a PC way meant to mask it.
30 posted on
01/19/2006 10:24:25 AM PST by
seppel
To: Dr. Scarpetta
They'll want to police blogs, websites, advertisements, magazines, mailers.... etc, etc. Will we all have to flea to satellite radio?
32 posted on
01/19/2006 10:24:55 AM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
" Fairness isnt going to hurt anybody.
Especially if it's more "fair" to the vast left wing commie, fascist, racist "liberal" conspiracy.
Do you believe this? Is this from Scrappleface or the Onion?
33 posted on
01/19/2006 10:25:36 AM PST by
garyhope
(Happy, healthy, prosperous New Year to all good Freepers and our brave military.)
To: Dr. Scarpetta; Springman
All the right wing talk show host just got a bunch of show prep material.
Will the fairness doctrine also apply to Imas and Scam America or the the "right wing extremist, christian fundamentalist"?
34 posted on
01/19/2006 10:25:40 AM PST by
McGruff
(Al Gore for DNC chairman!)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
There is a big difference between free speech and government-induced propaganda. Slaughter's bill slips over into the latter. Why should broadcasters be coerced to include what Slaughter thinks is appropriate?
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Any elected officeholder who advocates any infringment on our Freedom of Speech should be voted out of office.
37 posted on
01/19/2006 10:26:03 AM PST by
WhiteGuy
(Vote for gridlock)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson