Posted on 01/18/2006 10:46:04 AM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - Democrats are trying to gain the edge in the race for lobbying ethics reform with a package of measures to bar members of Congress from accepting gifts, meals and travel from lobbyists.
House and Senate Democratic leaders are to outline their approach to cleaning up the tainted relationship between lawmakers and lobbyists on Wednesday, a day after House Republican leaders announced that lobbying reform had moved to the top of their legislative priorities.
The battle to gain the ethical high ground comes amid the election-year scandal resulting from the activities of former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who personally or through his clients showered lawmakers with contributions, meals, skybox seats or golf trips. Abramoff has pleaded guilty to corruption-related charges and is cooperating with prosecutors.
"We have a duty to do everything we can to keep the trust and confidence of our constituents," House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said Tuesday in describing legislation that would ban privately funded travel, tighten the gift ban, double to two years the time between a lawmaker's retirement and when he can become a lobbyist and increase disclosure requirements for lobbyists.
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said that while the Abramoff scandal was largely "a Republican sin," because the lobbyist was closely aligned with top Republicans, "neither party has a monopoly on virtue."
"It is important for Democrats not to get on their high horse but to recognize that some of the corruption that's been taking place in Washington is going to require bipartisan work to clean up," Obama told ABC's "Good Morning America" on Wednesday.
In Columbus, Ohio, Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean vowed that his party would "put an end" to the corruption. "This cycle of corruption has to be broken, and we will break it," Dean said.
House Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier, who is leading the GOP effort to craft lobbying legislation, said that when the House returns to business in two weeks his committee will act on a rule banning former members-turned-lobbyists from entry on the House floor. He said he hoped to pass comprehensive legislation by the end of February.
Democrats tried to link Abramoff to Republicans, the main recipients of his largesse, and insist that the only real solution was to vote them out of office next November. "Mr. Abramoff and his associates are just the symptom. The disease is right here in the Capitol, with the party of power in Washington," said Rep. Louise M. Slaughter, D-N.Y., the Rules Committee's top Democrat.
Two senior Republicans have already taken a fall because of their ties to Abramoff. Former Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, announced after Abramoff's guilty plea that he would not try to regain the post he relinquished after being indicted on campaign finance charges in Texas. And Rep. Bob Ney (news, bio, voting record), R-Ohio, temporarily stepped down as House Administration Committee chairman.
The legislation House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid are to announce will cover much of the same ground as Hastert's: tightening bans on gifts and travel and slowing the "revolving door" between Congress and lobbying jobs.
The scramble to write lobbying legislation was welcomed by long ignored clean government groups.
"This week we are in the middle of a bidding war with various reform proposals being announced by Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress," said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21. "This is a case where you are going to have to read the fine print to make judgments about the effectiveness of the proposals being announced."
The Democratic proposal also would crack down on special interest provisions slipped into legislation in the final moments before passage. Hastert said he was ready to discuss restrictions on earmarks as long as the House and Senate acted together on the issue.
The Democratic measure also has a provision to shut down "pay-to-play" ventures such as the "K Street Project" where Republicans pressure lobbying groups to hire Republicans and direct funds to GOP causes. K Street in Washington is a center for lobbying firms.
Hastert acknowledged that, during a conference call with House Republicans Tuesday, not all favored a total ban on privately funded trips.
Rep. John Shadegg (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., who is running to succeed DeLay as majority leader, put out a statement saying, "Many trips are truly educational, and I believe a complete ban on all private travel would be an overreaction that doesn't get to the root of the problem."
Under current rules, sanctioned interest groups and think tanks can finance travel for speeches, meetings and fact-finding missions. Lobbyists are already banned from paying for such trips.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., and Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif, left, appear at a news conference on Capitol Hill Tuesday, Jan. 17, 2006, to discuss plans to clean up tranished relations between lawmakers and lobbyists. House Republicans moved to seize the initiative for ethics reform Tuesday with a comprehensive package of changes, including the banning of privately sponsored travel like that arranged by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)
The Democrats wouldn't know the high ground even should they somehow find their way to it.
Democrats know all about "high ground". It's where they run to while their girlfriend drowns in the car. Ask Teddy.
I think the only way they know how to get to it is currently "illegal."
We the people, could end up winners in all this posturing. If the two parties try to out-reform each other hard enough, something good could come of it. :):)
Is this a news story or an editorial? Bottom line, the Republicans got out in front of the dems on this issue and no matter what the dems do or say, the second the Republicans pass a reform package the second the dems lose the issue. Look for the dems to try and slow this down any way they can.
---
Nice try at damage control, Senator.
Time and the courts and sworn testimony will help us see how "largely "Republican"" this little affair truly was.
Probably about as much as the House Bank 'Rubbergate" affair was all Republican as well.
Every time Congress decides to reform itself, we the people end up losing some more of our tattered rights to free speech, assembly and redress of grievances. "Lobbying reform" will be no different.
It seems like everyone is talking about this girlfriend of Teddy's. Isn't he single? What is up with everyone facination with his girlfriend? He is a Senator aren't they able to have girlfriends or is he married?
If this were to pass, Bill Clinton will have to stop traveling around the world at the expense of the shareholders of almost every company.
The law of unintended consequences.
Eliminate tax concessions for businsses and you eliminate 75% of the need for lobbiests. Hit 'em in the purse.
High ground to them is where they are outside the survey of any controlling legal authority.
I fear you are right, but will hope for the best.
You're putting me on, right? Most hear remember Mary Jo Kopechne who was left to drown in Teddy's Olsmobile while he high-tailed it out of there until he had time to sober up and have his aides make up a good story. Young girl dead - fat drunken Ted goes on to give speeches to others about how the things they do "trouble" him.
When?
Are you too young to remember any of this? Try "googling" for Chappaquidick (sp?) I believe the year was 1969
I like that
1969!!!! That is the year I was born. thank you for the google name. I am going to. I never did like Kennedy, but from the sound of this it might just put the cherry on top. LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.