The words 'lost city' summons up images of jungle choked ruins or sand engulfed remnants of some vanished city not the suburbs of St. Louis, but there you have it.
To: robowombat
2 posted on
01/17/2006 2:08:41 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
To: robowombat
Around 500 B.C.E.Ah, Common Era instead of Christ. I wonder what event marks the beginning of the Common Era?
3 posted on
01/17/2006 2:08:46 PM PST by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: robowombat
Cahokia is not "lost", it is still there. Just....uninhabitable.
Much like a large part of the city of New Orleans.
4 posted on
01/17/2006 2:09:27 PM PST by
alloysteel
(There is no substitute for success. None. Nobody remembers who was in second place.)
To: robowombat
I visited Cahokia, and it's actually quite cool. It's also a cautionary tale against socialism. The (unknown) tribe that built the place, built a landscape of hills for their city. The chief forced workers to carry sacks of dirt from the river, to build a hill covering sixteen acres for his lodge:
Other mounds were used for homes for other elites, for burying important dead, and for ritual purposes. What made Cahokia a "lost" city is that only the mounds remain, along with whatever's under them.
6 posted on
01/17/2006 2:13:08 PM PST by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: robowombat
Bump! (PS: Did the mound builders suffer from piles?)
parsy, the naive american.
7 posted on
01/17/2006 2:14:16 PM PST by
parsifal
("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
To: robowombat
I grew up around St. Louis and frequent visits to the Cahokia Mounds were a part of my upbringing. I still visit every year or so. It used to be just a place to go for picnics, with a small museum, but in the past few years they have gone to great lengths to preserve the area as a historical/archaelogical site, and the new museum is very informative. It's a worthwhile stop for anyone passing through the area.
To: robowombat
There is also a great mock-up of an Indian village scene in the interpretive center across the street from the "Great Pyramid". In present day Cahokia, several miles away, there stands a very interesting French Colonial vertical log cabin.
10 posted on
01/17/2006 2:23:57 PM PST by
Riverine
To: robowombat
They employed exotic materials such as shell from the Gulf of Mexico, copper from present-day Michigan, mica from what is now North Carolina, and obsidian from the land that became Wyoming. The Mississippian Culture had a fascinating trade network. I've been to the museums at the Etowah mounds near Rome, Georgia, and at mounds near Spiro, Oklahoma- what, 1000 miles away? They show the extensive interchange of goods and materials between these peoples, east, west, north and south.
What I don't understand is how an article like this can neglect the most famous Mississippian mound complex of all: the Serpent Mound in southern Ohio.
14 posted on
01/17/2006 2:38:27 PM PST by
mikeus_maximus
(Voting for "the lesser of two evils" is still evil.)
To: robowombat
Still no sign of the wheel.
To: robowombat
Archaeology is cool. Some day your PC may be in a museum.
To: robowombat
Were the Cahokians a mix of Chinese (who discovered American on the West Coast) and Vikings (who discovered American on the East Coast)?
23 posted on
01/17/2006 3:13:53 PM PST by
fish hawk
(creatio ex nihilo)
To: robowombat
My Dad used to tell, with a remorseful shudder, how many time he and his friends - in childish ignorance - dug up, broke into and for working purposes destroyed what would have been archaeological treasures along the Chattahoochee River. Looking for arrowheads and other trinkets...
24 posted on
01/17/2006 3:37:58 PM PST by
ArmyTeach
(Pray daily for our troops.)
To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
43 posted on
03/16/2006 9:27:28 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
To: robowombat
44 posted on
03/16/2006 9:58:17 AM PST by
Ciexyz
(Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
To: robowombat
It's entirely possible that many civilizations that we know little or nothing about rose and fell leaving few obvious traces for us to uncover because rather than building and working in stone and metal, they worked in wood, hide, and other prerishable vegitable matter thas has since rotted away and disappeared. All archaeologists find are post holes and discolored earth if they look in the right places.
To: robowombat
Cahokia was the hub of a way of life for millions of Native Americans before the society's decline and devastation by foreign diseases.
Uh, sounds like a bit of an exaggeration to me. This civilization may have had a wide reach, but to say it encompassed millions is an incredible stretch.
47 posted on
03/16/2006 10:50:20 AM PST by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
To: robowombat
I didn't think it was lost.
The history channel Indiana Jones wannabe went there and it is a park and has been for a long time. There have been extensive studies including earth moving calculations based on straw bags and human gradability.
50 posted on
03/16/2006 12:55:47 PM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: robowombat
I have read that Cahokia was the largest city in America until Philadelphia and New York. Good find! I have read that when Europeans encountered Indians, their standard of living was better.
55 posted on
03/16/2006 4:27:59 PM PST by
Ptarmigan
(Proud bunny hater and killer)
To: robowombat
""It would be like if you visited Europe in the Middle Ages, and there were no royalty or nobles--only peasants," Bailey says."Ummmmm..........what??
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson