Skip to comments.
Childlessness A Sin, Southern Baptist Leader Says
KWTX ^
| 1-17-06
Posted on 01/17/2006 1:31:49 PM PST by WKB
Rev. R. Albert Mohler, Jr., the president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, says it's "an absolute revolt against God's design" if husbands and wives purposely avoid bearing children.
On his Web site and other articles and interviews, Mohler argues that "marriage, sex and children are part of one package" and that "to deny any part of this wholeness is to reject God's intention in creation and his mandate revealed in the Bible."
In a CNN interview, the Baptist leader added, We grow up by having children. Without that responsibility, we have a generation of perpetual adolescents just growing old."
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: blessedistheman; childfree; churchlady; cult; donttellmewhattodo; freaks; inbredpreacheralert; keywordtrolls; mentallyillfundies; moonbat; provingwhat; religiousnuts; sbc; sin; snakefondler; talibornagains; thussaysthelord; thusspakethemoonbat; trustandobey; ummmsowhat; uselessoutrage; ustaliban; whocares; zealots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 641-654 next last
To: Mount Athos
Wasn't God's very first commandment to mankind to be fruitful and multiply? Yeah, there were two people here then.
You missed the revisions I guess.
361
posted on
01/17/2006 5:51:49 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
To: Full Court
"1 Corinthians 2:15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things..."
And who determines who is spiritual? The person sitting in judgement on everyone else?
362
posted on
01/17/2006 5:52:02 PM PST
by
CWOJackson
(tancredo? Wasn't he the bounty hunter in the Star Wars trilogy?)
To: gotribe
Thanks for the support. I do understand the situation but whenever I read any proclamation from such people (preachers and the like), followed by the amens from the choir, it gets my dander up a bit.
To: CajunConservative
I think the point he was making was that what he sees as a delaying of marriage for worldly gain - or material things.
Just as with the original post - we're just getting a portion of something he said - rather than the whole of his words...
I come from the most (well ALMOST most) fundamental of independent Baptist backgrounds. The one thing we learned was that not ALL are called to be married.
All I can think of that he's saying is that he feels that many are called to be married - but would rather stay single for selfish reasons.
364
posted on
01/17/2006 6:17:42 PM PST
by
pamlet
To: Aquinasfan
<< What changed in 1930? >>
As to that, I don't know.
As to the rest, I'm constantly grateful that my conscience is captive to the Word of God -- and not to repeat the mistakes of others.
Dan
What Is Biblical Christianity?
365
posted on
01/17/2006 6:35:00 PM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Vladiator
Naw. I think its more of an edict.
366
posted on
01/17/2006 6:43:24 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: Pukin Dog
Holy Cow!
I'm a female version of Pukin Dog!
;-)
367
posted on
01/17/2006 6:55:07 PM PST
by
Dashing Dasher
(Saving the Republic - one joke at a time)
To: WKB
So this twit thinks I'm going to a different place than he is when we croak.
I hope not, but for his sake, not mine...
368
posted on
01/17/2006 6:56:59 PM PST
by
decal
(Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
To: decal
I don't see where he said it was the
unpardonable sin just a sin.
369
posted on
01/17/2006 6:58:09 PM PST
by
WKB
(If you can't dazzle them with brilliance.. then Baffle them with BS)
To: LizardQueen
I, for one, applaud your courage.
370
posted on
01/17/2006 6:58:20 PM PST
by
Dashing Dasher
(Saving the Republic - one joke at a time)
To: CWOJackson
You don't have to like it bro., but the Bible does say to judge things, and be wise.
371
posted on
01/17/2006 6:59:35 PM PST
by
Full Court
(Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
To: MikeinIraq
I am willing to bet that you can think of several people just in your town that shouldn't have had kids. If you miss them in town, turn on Jerry Springer, et al and you'll see a whole bunch of people who are so selfish and screwed up they should never have procreated.
372
posted on
01/17/2006 7:00:12 PM PST
by
Dashing Dasher
(Saving the Republic - one joke at a time)
To: pamlet
I come from the most (well ALMOST most) fundamental of independent Baptist backgrounds. Tell us more!!
Did you stay fundamental?
373
posted on
01/17/2006 7:01:48 PM PST
by
Full Court
(Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
To: festus
Naw. I think its more of an edict. Baptists don't have edicts. They just have preachers who give you an opinion.
374
posted on
01/17/2006 7:02:48 PM PST
by
Full Court
(Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
To: WKB
Rev. R. Albert Mohler, Jr can kiss my @$$.
375
posted on
01/17/2006 7:03:26 PM PST
by
Drango
( No animals were harmed while producing this post)
To: Full Court
376
posted on
01/17/2006 7:04:05 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: Dashing Dasher
If you miss them in town, turn on Jerry Springer, et al and you'll see a whole bunch of people who are so selfish and screwed up they should never have procreated. Yep.
Christiams should do their best to procreate, but the unsaved world oughta give it a rest.
377
posted on
01/17/2006 7:04:52 PM PST
by
Full Court
(Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
To: Sonny M; Howlin
Also there are people who HAVE kids who are mean and bitter. I call some of them neighbors.
I call one of them, Mom and another one, Dad.
378
posted on
01/17/2006 7:05:19 PM PST
by
Dashing Dasher
(Saving the Republic - one joke at a time)
To: festus
379
posted on
01/17/2006 7:05:30 PM PST
by
Full Court
(Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
To: William Creel
Do you believe he is wrong?
Or would it just make you feel better if everybody just agreed with your reaction?
380
posted on
01/17/2006 7:05:45 PM PST
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 641-654 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson