I'M NOT ADVOCATING THIS, JUST PUTTING IT ON THE TABLE
Posted on 01/15/2006 3:50:23 AM PST by Marze Por Gohar Reports
Islamic Republic (IR) is working around the clock on its nuclear program, while Mr. ElBaradei suggests that US should provide a guarantee to the Islamic Regime. The IR nuclear project is the only guarantee for regime’s survival. The regime in Tehran will do everything in its power to make sure that it posses the nuclear bomb, which will serve as the guarantee for the Islamic Regime to stay in power. There should be little doubt left about the regimes ideological goals; having Mr. Ahmadinejad in power, the regime is not shy to express its views about the infidels and the Jews.
Only Two months after Mr. Ahmadinejad expressed the regimes wish to wipe Israel off the map, he called the Holocaust a myth, and proposed the Jews should move to Europe or Alaska.
The chairman of the Council for Preserving the Constitution, Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati clearly expressed that only Shiites were human beings and the rest of the worlds infidels were corrupt animals which should be destroyed. Infidels, he said, were evil monsters which ruined the planet earth.
The Islamic Regimes support of the various terrorist organizations is no longer a secret, even the European Union who have enjoyed the lucrative deals as long as they could are beginning to get worried about this regime. The ideological utopia of the Islamic Regime is simple and clear: an Islamic world without infidels and Zionists. While the regime has had 27 years to plan and test tactics to get closer to its ultimate goal, the western countries are only recently starting to wonder what to do.
Muhammad ElBaradei confirmed on December 5, 2005 Israel's estimation that Islamic Republic is only a few months away from creating an atomic bomb. If Teheran indeed resumed its uranium enrichment in other plants, as threatened, it would take only a few months to produce a nuclear bomb, El-Baradei told The Independent.
Mr. Elbaradeis rather naïve belief that a security offered to the IR will prevent IR from lodging its long term goals is wrong. Not even the Islamic Republic is in line with ElBaradeis plans as it is coming out of the closet with overt support and brazen allegiance with terrorist organizations. Hammas political chief declared in Tehran: “Hammas vows revenge if Iran is attacked.”
While the undeclared war is taking place on Iraqi soil to stall any coherent policy on Iran, the US allies are hoping in quiet desperation for stability in Iraq. The Islamic Republic will ensure that the US forces pay a high price in casualties by using its vast network of various terrorist organizations and erode domestic support here in the US by the help of American print and TV news media the majority of which seem all too eager to jump on the band wagon, obfuscate the real issue, exploit the negative news and shape the public opinion against the administration.
Trying diplomacy with Islamic Republics Tehran is as effective and practical as beating a dead horse; it is a one-way, dead-end street. Russia, once the power house of the former Soviet Union, is eagerly awaiting the outcome of the nuclear issue with IR and will continue to supply the Islamic Republic with arms and military technology and help along their nuclear developments.
Russia and Iran control a significant percentage of the world’s oil and natural gas supply. Their alliance with a surly and very energy-hungry Asian dragon China will be an axis to recon with. Also, China and Russia will veto any referral to Security Council and by the time they decide to reconsider, it will be literally too late.
So, any action from the UN’s Security Council seems unrealistic; the only immediate option is a military attack which probably will not completely destroy the numerous strategically located and well hidden sites of the Islamic republic. When asked why US fighter jets do not bomb Iranian nuclear targets on their own from aircraft carriers in the region, former justice department prosecutor and intelligence expert John Loftus replied: ”that's a real good question that has been carefully studied. There are over 360 separate targets inside Iran that have been identified. Most of them are non-vulnerable – many underneath residential neighborhoods and Islamic shrines. These are not places we can bomb. The Iranians were paying attention when Iraq's reactor was bombed and have learned the lessons.”
Meanwhile, experts and the Iranian opposition unanimously believe that a military strike is not the solution on Iran and it may delay but not stop Islamic Republics nuclear bomb project. It will serve to rally the fence riders behind hardliners. The Mullahs will come back with a vengeance, this time armed with nuclear weapons…
The only option that remains is regime change.
However the time is running out very fast.
The first thing that needs to be done is to officially adapt the regime change policy. Next, abandon the wild goose chase of a negotiation, shine the light on the EU and help them see the light and adapt the same policy of regime change in Iran.
Iranians and the opposition are able to bring the regime to its feet on their own, in due time. Iranian people are longing for democracy and freedom and with the right support this can happen much sooner, at the right time and avert a potential disaster for the middle east and Israel in particular.
Mraze Por Gohar Party hinted at a plan to overthrow the regime two years ago and we are still able to put our plan into action but the time is fast running out and the window of opportunity will be lost soon. And this time the Iranian people may not be the only victims.
Mani Aryamand Party Secretary Marze Por Gohar Party Iranians for a secular republic www.marzeporgohar.org
:) the only way to change the attitude of this regime is to replace it with a secular democratic one. The experience of the past 27 years have made it clear the IR ideological goals: Destroy Isreal and infidels!
I'M NOT ADVOCATING THIS, JUST PUTTING IT ON THE TABLE
I think you seriously misunderestimate the will of the North American Redneck. Iran is and has been a festering sore on the backside of the USA since the late 1970's. We should have flattened Tehran back in 1979 after they committed an act of war against us, but unfortunately, this is yet another of Carter's legacys we've yet to live down.
If the people of Iran, who vastly outnumber the Theocrats in charge, want change, then they'd better rise up and do it and do it quickly.
The threats you cite regarding Iranian terror cells committing acts in this counrty, if allowed to come to fruition, will only result in the complete and utter destruction of your country and the wrath of the American Redneck against anything and everything Muslim in this country.
This is not 1979 and Jimmy Carter is not President. Iran will never, ever be allowed to have a nuclear bomb. Take that to the bank. Iran, IMHO, is about to learn a very valuable lesson about poking the sleeping giant in the eye.
Is the Iranian Theocracy aware of the firepower of just one Trident Submarine?
Tick, tick, tick...heartbreaking for ordinary Iranians who just want a decent life.
Iran probably built schools, apartment buildings, and hospitals on top of nuclear sites. They couldn't care less about their own people.
But when the US tries to change things in the Middle East, the rest of the world yells bloody murder, so we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. In the end, the world will stand by and hold Uncle Sam's coat, then blame him whatever the outcome. But make no mistake, the President said loud and clear and more than once, that nothing was off the table...including the use of force.
I don't know if there will be enough time to wait for the Iranian people to rise up to overthrow the nutjobs ruling Iran, but I don't see why we can't provide support to any group that wants to overthrow the Mullahs.
Good luck. I hope the secularists in Iran get the upper hand on the insane government before they get a nuke. The entire country will suffer terribly if they don't, because all will be killed, not just the insane government.
you seem to be little off in this issue.
Iranian people and Amricans are on the same side and to day it is in everyone interest to have a regime change.
Now, I rather have dialouge which has to do with this matter and not imaginary military games!
Yes indeed, there are report that they have build site close to shrines and civilian aras, the last thing mullahs care about it the Iranian people!
The Europian countries have showed their true nature even during the Iraq war. Rememebr the french who after the liberation wanted a piece of cake?
I am in Europe myself and i know the nature of europians, I once asked one of my europian friends why they ahve double moral and he replied it is good since if we loose the one we have the other one!!!
Forgett about the this and that aftermath, the americans will win the friendship of Iranian who already are very pro-american people.
me neither!!!! We are bele to overthrow the regime but the time is running out!!!
Thank you for your support!
I hope that the administration realize that the regime change is the best option and that faaast!!!
Welcome to FR. Many of us support an Iran free of the Mullahs.
I am fully aware of both the history of Iran and the current situation and I agree that regime change is in everyone's best interest. I am also aware of what will happen to your country if you allow the radicals in charge to launch an attack, particularly a nuclear attack, against us or Israel, on behalf of your country. You should be aware of this too. Do not for one minute underestimate the lengths we will go to to protect our way of life.
It has been widely reported by sources both inside and outside Iran that the numbers of those in opposition to the current Theocracy are great. It is high time that these masses forcefully stand up to the Theocracy and quit waiting for the rest of the world to do it for them. If our military has to do it, you won't like the result. However, I'm sure if the opposition in Iran rises up and makes a serious stab at overthrowing the Theocracy, rather than just paying it lip service, our support and the support of other like minded nations will be there. People in the opposition are going to have to be willing to die in large numbers to overthrow this regime and you simply cannot sit back and expect our soldiers to die for your revolution. It is, after all, your fight to fight, not ours. I would strongly suggest that all like minded Iranians do everything in their power to not make it our fight. If you do, I guarantee you will not like the result.
Thank you! Good to hear that
Marze Por Gohar want to establish a secular Republic.
We believe that all democratic parties should be able to function.
As for mosadegh he was a true nationalist he did a lot of good for Iran and he had mistakes the same goes for shah.
We believe that we have to see ahead and as things are looking right now shah and Mosadegh deed are our last problem.
You may find much more on our website:
http://www.marzeporgohar.org/index.php?l=1&cat=21&scat=114
http://www.marzeporgohar.org/index.php?l=1&cat=21&scat=76
and more...
:^(
I'd prefer regime change by insurrection too. But the record of peoples rising up against totalitarian regimes with thousands of tanks and dedicated paramilitaries, it singularly bad. The usual result is 5000 to 50000 dead and no change in regime, in days or months. It takes serious commitment to military action, weapons, and may potentially also require US air support, as it did for the northern alliance in Afghanistan. Are you ready for that?
Because the idea that these nuts are going to go quietly because of people in the streets with flowers chanting slogans, is a dream and completely unrealistic, and will not happen. No more than rallies in Tianamen square brought down communism in China, or protests in 1991 toppled Saddam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.