President Bush this is what you should do-

Marze Por Gohar ^ | Mani Aryamand

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

:) the only way to change the attitude of this regime is to replace it with a secular democratic one. The experience of the past 27 years have made it clear the IR ideological goals: Destroy Isreal and infidels!

[TheRobb7]

I concur with you, KillTime. In addition, we could always threaten to do this: I'M NOT ADVOCATING THIS, JUST PUTTING IT ON THE TABLE

[Thermalseeker]

Next time people where ever in the world sent of their children to scholl it may be their last time....

I think you seriously misunderestimate the will of the North American Redneck. Iran is and has been a festering sore on the backside of the USA since the late 1970's. We should have flattened Tehran back in 1979 after they committed an act of war against us, but unfortunately, this is yet another of Carter's legacys we've yet to live down.

If the people of Iran, who vastly outnumber the Theocrats in charge, want change, then they'd better rise up and do it and do it quickly.

The threats you cite regarding Iranian terror cells committing acts in this counrty, if allowed to come to fruition, will only result in the complete and utter destruction of your country and the wrath of the American Redneck against anything and everything Muslim in this country.

This is not 1979 and Jimmy Carter is not President. Iran will never, ever be allowed to have a nuclear bomb. Take that to the bank. Iran, IMHO, is about to learn a very valuable lesson about poking the sleeping giant in the eye.

Is the Iranian Theocracy aware of the firepower of just one Trident Submarine?

[hershey]

Tick, tick, tick...heartbreaking for ordinary Iranians who just want a decent life.

[hershey]

Iran probably built schools, apartment buildings, and hospitals on top of nuclear sites. They couldn't care less about their own people.

[hershey]

But when the US tries to change things in the Middle East, the rest of the world yells bloody murder, so we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. In the end, the world will stand by and hold Uncle Sam's coat, then blame him whatever the outcome. But make no mistake, the President said loud and clear and more than once, that nothing was off the table...including the use of force.

[Brett66]

I don't know if there will be enough time to wait for the Iranian people to rise up to overthrow the nutjobs ruling Iran, but I don't see why we can't provide support to any group that wants to overthrow the Mullahs.

[Cyber Liberty]

Good luck. I hope the secularists in Iran get the upper hand on the insane government before they get a nuke. The entire country will suffer terribly if they don't, because all will be killed, not just the insane government.

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

you seem to be little off in this issue.

Iranian people and Amricans are on the same side and to day it is in everyone interest to have a regime change.

Now, I rather have dialouge which has to do with this matter and not imaginary military games!

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

Yes indeed, there are report that they have build site close to shrines and civilian aras, the last thing mullahs care about it the Iranian people!

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

The Europian countries have showed their true nature even during the Iraq war. Rememebr the french who after the liberation wanted a piece of cake?

I am in Europe myself and i know the nature of europians, I once asked one of my europian friends why they ahve double moral and he replied it is good since if we loose the one we have the other one!!!

Forgett about the this and that aftermath, the americans will win the friendship of Iranian who already are very pro-american people.

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

me neither!!!! We are bele to overthrow the regime but the time is running out!!!

Thank you for your support!

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

I hope that the administration realize that the regime change is the best option and that faaast!!!

[Tijeras_Slim]

Welcome to FR. Many of us support an Iran free of the Mullahs.

[Brooklyn Kid]

I want to see regime change too and believe that's the best solution.

Is that Mossadeq in the photo of your party member? Do you believe Mossadeq had connections with the Soviets? I understand there are arguments between the pro-Shah Iranians and the pro-Mossadeq. How do you see things politically? You are secular. Good.
Would you consider yourself or your party to be liberal?

[Thermalseeker]

Iranian people and Amricans are on the same side and to day it is in everyone interest to have a regime change.

I am fully aware of both the history of Iran and the current situation and I agree that regime change is in everyone's best interest. I am also aware of what will happen to your country if you allow the radicals in charge to launch an attack, particularly a nuclear attack, against us or Israel, on behalf of your country. You should be aware of this too. Do not for one minute underestimate the lengths we will go to to protect our way of life.

It has been widely reported by sources both inside and outside Iran that the numbers of those in opposition to the current Theocracy are great. It is high time that these masses forcefully stand up to the Theocracy and quit waiting for the rest of the world to do it for them. If our military has to do it, you won't like the result. However, I'm sure if the opposition in Iran rises up and makes a serious stab at overthrowing the Theocracy, rather than just paying it lip service, our support and the support of other like minded nations will be there. People in the opposition are going to have to be willing to die in large numbers to overthrow this regime and you simply cannot sit back and expect our soldiers to die for your revolution. It is, after all, your fight to fight, not ours. I would strongly suggest that all like minded Iranians do everything in their power to not make it our fight. If you do, I guarantee you will not like the result.

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

Thank you! Good to hear that

[Marze Por Gohar Reports]

Marze Por Gohar want to establish a secular Republic.
We believe that all democratic parties should be able to function.

As for mosadegh he was a true nationalist he did a lot of good for Iran and he had mistakes the same goes for shah.
We believe that we have to see ahead and as things are looking right now shah and Mosadegh deed are our last problem.

You may find much more on our website:
http://www.marzeporgohar.org/index.php?l=1&cat=21&scat=114
http://www.marzeporgohar.org/index.php?l=1&cat=21&scat=76
and more...

[Cyber Liberty]

I must confess that I doubt the ability of an internal problem doing the job....

:^(

[JasonC]

It is not remotely impossible to bomb 300 targets. The USAF destroyed the entire oil industry in Germany in a matter of months, in 1944. Our technology for it is vastly superior to what it was then. If the nuke drive is not stopped by domestic insurrection and the US does not decide to invade conventionally to effect regime change that way, the US can readily destroy the Iranian nuclear program from the air.

I'd prefer regime change by insurrection too. But the record of peoples rising up against totalitarian regimes with thousands of tanks and dedicated paramilitaries, it singularly bad. The usual result is 5000 to 50000 dead and no change in regime, in days or months. It takes serious commitment to military action, weapons, and may potentially also require US air support, as it did for the northern alliance in Afghanistan. Are you ready for that?

Because the idea that these nuts are going to go quietly because of people in the streets with flowers chanting slogans, is a dream and completely unrealistic, and will not happen. No more than rallies in Tianamen square brought down communism in China, or protests in 1991 toppled Saddam.