Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Schwarzenegger is right. He tried to get rid of the automated formula for school spending with Prop. 76, which the CA voters, in their infinite ignorance, defeated.

Then some people blame Arnold for the budget, instead of putting the blame where it belongs, the voters, who swallow the Dem propaganda and vote in mandated spending, such as Prop. 98.

1 posted on 01/14/2006 8:53:50 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Alia; A CA Guy; NewzJunkie; doodlelady; Hildy

THIS is the real reason for the CA budget problems that some try to blame on Arnold. Arnold tried to mitigate this with Prop. 76, which was defeated.

"A major reason is that more than 70% of state spending, which totals a projected $126.6 billion in the fiscal year starting July 1, is already accounted for before he even begins the budget process. That money is mandated to be spent for specific purposes and nothing else. It's a fiscal straitjacket that makes it impossible for the state to make logical choices and put its tax dollars to work where they may be most needed. "


2 posted on 01/14/2006 8:56:40 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
the voters, who swallow the Dem propaganda and vote in mandated spending, such as Prop. 98.

Dims always want to spend other people's money. They want confiscatory tax rates on the wealthy in order to pay community college costs of the millions in CA. Just like getting the money for the Constitutionally mandated "free health care for everyone" mantra the Dims are so found of touting. Who will pay for free health care in the perfect Dim environment? We all know the answer to that - stop the trillion dollar war in the middle east and raise taxes. We are the wealthiest country on the globe and we need to have a Democratic government that will provide free schooling and free health care from cradle to grave to everyone, illegal and legal alike. Vote us in and we will give it to you!! /sarcasm

3 posted on 01/14/2006 8:58:53 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Don't let the LAT suck you in too far. We would not have gotten rid of Rose Bird, Passed Prop 13 or Prop 187 without the initiative process.

It may not always work out the way we like, but with California's political mess (dems in charge) we sometimes have to take bad with the good.

It's my understanding that some of the 70% might actually be able to be reduced if a 'crisis situation' could be stipulated by the Governor and the Legislature.

It's also kind of disingenuous for the LAT to act like Schwarzenegger found out that things were a little tougher than he thought they'd be, in the face of democrat intransigence.
4 posted on 01/14/2006 9:00:17 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Prop 76, others may have had a different outcome if they'd been floated in a general, not special election.


11 posted on 01/14/2006 9:35:35 PM PST by umgud (uncompassionate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Yep, the ultimate blame must fall on the voters. Even the term limits initiative we have was unnecessary had the voters been doing the proper thing all along.
12 posted on 01/14/2006 9:46:50 PM PST by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Schwarzenegger is right. He tried to get rid of the automated formula for school spending with Prop. 76, which the CA voters, in their infinite ignorance, defeated.

Wrong. He tried to get rid of part of the formula: Test 3, the one that makes sure Education funding can NEVER go down. (Prop 76 also created more debt, authorized more bonds, and deferred more expenses).

Regardless of formulas, Schwarzenegger is giving more to schools than the formulas require. And this is HIS proposal. When the legislature is done with it, if history tells us anything, it will be higher yet. From the Legislative Analysts Office: Overview of the Governor’s Budget:

The main increase involves Proposition 98 education, where the Governor is proposing to provide $2.2 billion more than the minimum guarantee over the current and budget year combined. These added funds are proposed for such purposes as school district equalization, payment of past mandates, and cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) foregone in past years.
And lets not forget that one of those formulas was a result of Arnold's own Proposition 49, After School Programs. Also from the LAO Report:
In addition, the budget provides $428 million in new spending for K-12 after school programs as required by Proposition 49. In the higher education area, the budget includes funding for the “buy out” of student fee increases for both the California Sate University (CSU) and the University of California (UC).

13 posted on 01/14/2006 9:55:24 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
The problem began in 1978 with the passage of Proposition 13....

No, the solution began in 1978 with the passage of Proposition 13.

20 posted on 01/14/2006 10:06:32 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Tempting as it is, the state can only tap the wealthy so many times.

Unfortunately, the morons in Sacramento will never get it.

28 posted on 01/14/2006 10:24:44 PM PST by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Voters like spending on schools and other middle class stuff. Oh sure, they don't like welfare but that's about it. There's no chance we'll see spending reform in this state in the forseeable future.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

35 posted on 01/14/2006 11:09:57 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
FareOpinion looks to the LAT for backup, now that they're trying to shore up Arnold so that he can get that fat budget and his idiotic bond issue passed.

How appropriate.

36 posted on 01/14/2006 11:14:41 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
It was payback for his unecessary 500 million special election last year? To bad McClintock didn't win.

As for the budget for 06', he is increasing government spending at a higher rate than Davis.
39 posted on 01/14/2006 11:25:47 PM PST by Pro-Bush (We protect Korea's border better than our own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
California legislators NEED to be in either strait jackets or handcuffs.
45 posted on 01/15/2006 11:13:01 AM PST by InABunkerUnderSF (Free the H1Bs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson