Posted on 01/12/2006 3:12:16 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
SOUTH Africa's blood donor service has banned blood from sexually active homosexual men due to a higher risk of HIV, it said overnight, provoking an angry response from gay activists.
"A man who has had sex with another man within the last five years, whether oral or anal sex, with or without a condom ... is not permitted to donate blood and must please not do so," Sapa news agency quoted the head of the South African National Blood Service, Dr. Robert Crookes, as saying.
South Africa has the world's highest number of HIV cases with more than 5 million people infected.
The South African Gay and Lesbian Rights Advocacy Group said blood donors should be screened according to whether they used a condom, not their sexuality, and threatened to take Dr Crookes to court over his comments, which it blasted as discriminatory.
"I understand that the blood transfusion service needs some sort of social indicator to derive the safety of blood but the use of gay in a blanket way indicates this is not fair," Dawie Nel, spokesman for the group, told SABC radio.
Dr Crookes said the blood service's position was based on international practice and research that showed sexually active gay men were more likely to be infected with HIV than their heterosexual counterparts, Sapa said.
Post-apartheid South Africa has one of the most progressive constitutions in the world, which is the only one to enshrine equal rights for gays and lesbians.
South Africa's top court said in December it was unconstitutional to deny gay people the right to marry, putting it on track to become the first country in Africa to legalise same-sex marriages.
Small activist group, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance – from which leading activist groups have distanced themselves – plans to picket blood donor centres tomorrow over the policy, SABC reported.
The National Blood Service and the Gay and Lesbian Alliance were not immediately available to comment.
Mr Nel said the decision to ban gay men from giving blood was not new, but that the blood service had reiterated its position following renewed criticism from gay rights groups.
And if anyone gets AIDS from a blood transfusion, they still want to be able to sue the hell out of the hospital, of course.
I see an opportunity...start an exclusive homo centric blood bank. No tests required.
How dare those doctors discriminate against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus? It's species-ist!
The only problem I see with this is that the WHO needs to make it a WORLDWIDE ban.
I'm sure that bank's gonna get a LOT of takers......
WHO is far too busy promoting abortion worldwide!
The whole country is trying to kill itself with AIDS and yet they think that they have a problem because they don't have gay marriage yet. Yeah, sounds like they have their priorities straight down there.
Works for me!
When I had surgery last year, I gave my own blood in case it was needed during surgery.
Sounds like a VERY sensible precaution!
It is a human right for gays to donate blood and STD's! The rest of the population be damned!
concur, but it would change the tone of the debate, would it not?
That's SOP for the American Red Cross, at least as of when I last gave blood (December). If you have had sex with a man since 1977, and you are a man, they will not take your blood.
Sounds good to me.
There's lots of ways to help out without actually giving blood. But I guess I miss the point.
They arent happy giving their Death serum Anally any more, Now they want to give it to us from their blood.
No Thank You, and Thank You President Reagan for bringing this to the forefront.
We all remember the criticism President Reagan got when he donated his own blood for his operation.
There are no words....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.