The problem with Gitmo is the lack of transparency and the lack of judicial control, not the treatment of the prisoners. And I was for the war against mass-slaughterer Saddam Hussein, unlike 80% of my fellow-citizens.
Glad to hear at least some Germans still have some political sense and don't want to kiss Saddam's rear end!
There has been plenty of transparency - way more than there should have been, IMHO, when dealing with an ongoing war against terrorism.
Your difficulty in ascertaining the transparency is not America's fault.
There is too much transparency.
The terrorists there try every day to hurt, maim, or kill the U.S. soldiers watching them.
And the terrorists know how to game the press.
Gitmo is far from being a 'torture zone'.
But, you know what the terrorists feared above all else upon capture?
They feared torture, they see any other treatment as a sign of weakness on our part.
They see kindness as weakness.
Oh grasshopper, you have much to learn. Have you ever heard of OPSEC?? (Operational security)
Gitmo is a military affair and not a civilian one.
The LAST thing we need is judicial control over anything. let alone Gitmo. Our judges think they are an exceptional class of superior beings, sent to guide us to the right results [as they see them], no matter what WE think, ignoring the fact that most of them get on the bench by nuzzling some ward heelers' buttocks. Don't like a law? Judges ignore them. Don't believe in punishment? Sentence a child rapist to 60 days so HE can get therapy. Feel constrained by the folks that wrote the Constitution? Make it a "living document" that only "Feelgood" Marshall, Earl "The Pearl" Warren, William "Zero" Douglas, "Empty" Souter, "Ruth "Vader" Ginsburg, Harry Blackmun and the rest of the lefties can "read" correctly. No! No judicial oversight. I'd like to get some useful intel. out of Gitmo.