Skip to comments.
Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-4)
Senate Judiciary ^
| 1-12-06
| Senate Judiciary
Posted on 01/12/2006 5:14:27 AM PST by OXENinFLA
Day 4: Hearing Resumes
This morning, Senators will question Judge Alito during a third round. They will then go into a closed session, to review the FBI background investigation on the Supreme Court nominee. Outside witnesses may be called to testify this afternoon, as well as the American Bar Association, to discuss its recommendations.
THURS., 9:00AM ET, C-SPAN
Live Links
C-span
Judiciary LIVE LINK
FEDNET
CapitolHearings.org
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superdeduper; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,841-2,860, 2,861-2,880, 2,881-2,900 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
To: CharlesWayneCT
``
The inside report is that Clinton ordered this, but got one of her fellow senate democrats to make the objection so as not to get her hands dirty.``
let me guess, her butt boy, Jack Reed.
2,861
posted on
01/12/2006 2:50:05 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
To: CharlesWayneCT
This guy, Liu is definitely against.
DEFINITELY. He thinks he's smarter than the 7 judges who just commented.
Jeez, what a loon.
2,862
posted on
01/12/2006 2:50:18 PM PST
by
Chuck54
( "Happy people need no particular cause to be happy.")
To: CharlesWayneCT; Arizona Carolyn
The senate required unanimous consent to carry the nominees over through the recess. The democrats wouldn't allow unanimous consent so long as Kavanaugh's name was on the list. The inside report is that Clinton ordered this, but got one of her fellow senate democrats to make the objection so as not to get her hands dirty. That story also sas Clinton got a different senator to put the hold on him. Thanks to both of you for the report. Muchos gracias.
To: Lizarde
wow
I can honestly say I have no idea what any of these guys just said. The 1st woman was the only coherent person there.
uh oh....this guy is bothering me. Is he legal age?
2,864
posted on
01/12/2006 2:50:58 PM PST
by
Jrabbit
(Kaufman County, Texas)
To: Chuck54
Who is the snot nosed kid?
To: Chuck54
Yup. So it must've been a for-against panel.
2,866
posted on
01/12/2006 2:51:10 PM PST
by
ilovew
("We are living through a watershed moment in the story of freedom." GWB 12-14-05)
Comment #2,867 Removed by Moderator
To: Mo1
Weren't the "hanging chads" on paper ballots???
2,868
posted on
01/12/2006 2:51:14 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Become a $ - day Donor.----Less than a Starbuck's coffee!!)
To: puroresu
```Wow! Howlin, are you starting to adopt the more aggressive fighting style of us hardcores? :-)``
Ah, did you mean to direct that to ME????? Me, more agressive?
2,869
posted on
01/12/2006 2:51:23 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
To: Chuck54
Liu is AGAINST us and all Republicans. He is for the little man who has one leg and no arms, even though that man killed a family of 8 who home schooled their children.
Liu is Ginsburg's lap dog.
2,870
posted on
01/12/2006 2:51:46 PM PST
by
JFC
(W, I am with YA)
To: Txsleuth
2,871
posted on
01/12/2006 2:51:58 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: jennyjenny
2,872
posted on
01/12/2006 2:52:02 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
To: samadams2000
Excellent!!
About the girlish man who is testifying now I want to say, "WAH WAH WAH WAH!"
2,873
posted on
01/12/2006 2:52:19 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
To: Lizarde
LOL. YEP. 8th graders have never murdered anyone I guess.
This guy needs to be lambasted by one of our guys and you can bet someone is taking notes.
2,874
posted on
01/12/2006 2:52:33 PM PST
by
Chuck54
( "Happy people need no particular cause to be happy.")
To: Howlin
Ah, thanks. I had to leave for a while and am trying to catch up.
Comment #2,876 Removed by Moderator
To: jennyjenny
A former law clerk of Ruth Bada$$ Ginsberg and now an Asst Law Professor at the U of CA....total leftist!
2,877
posted on
01/12/2006 2:52:56 PM PST
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org • Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: Howlin
Isn't it odd to have a sitting supreme court justice's clerk testifying at a hearing for a possible new supreme court justice?
To: Arizona Carolyn
We can split the difference with them....paper ballots..but no same-day registration...and picture ID!!!
2,879
posted on
01/12/2006 2:53:08 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Become a $ - day Donor.----Less than a Starbuck's coffee!!)
To: Txsleuth
I am gonna be SHOCKED if one of these panelist isn't vehemently AGAINST Alito.. UH..OH...we found the ONE!!!
He must have missed the part about 90% of appeals are NOT reversed, which fits with Alito and most other appelate judges.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,841-2,860, 2,861-2,880, 2,881-2,900 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson