Skip to comments.
Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-2)
Senate Judiciary ^
| 1-10-06
| Senate Judiciary
Posted on 01/10/2006 4:14:05 AM PST by OXENinFLA
ALITO CONFIRMATION HEARINGS
Questioning Begins Today
Each of the eighteen senators on the Judiciary Cmte. will have 30 minutes to question Supreme Court nominee Samual Alito today during round one. Sen. Arlen Specter, as chairman, will begin, then they will alternate by party in order of individual seniority. Round two starts on Wednesday.
Live LinksC-span
Judiciary LIVE LINK
FEDNET
CapitolHearings.org
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; babykilling; bidenisamoron; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superduper; superduperduper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,921-2,940, 2,941-2,960, 2,961-2,980, 2,981-3,000 last
To: RedBloodedAmerican
I cant Believe Chappaquiddick Ted questioned this guy over ETHICS!...Surely...even a DUmmy can see the hypocrisy... I wonder how "the Swimmer' would fair with the ABA!...For what its worth....
THE KENNEDY LEGACY
Can't Drive......
Can't Fly.......
Can't Ski.......
Can't Skipper a boat...
(but they think they know whats best for everyone else!)
2,981
posted on
01/11/2006 12:03:29 AM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: mware
2,982
posted on
01/11/2006 3:32:01 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
To: All
Smooth Second Day for Judge Alito
Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito so far hasn't earned the outcry from opponents who are hoping to put him on the hook the way failed nominee Robert Bork was in 1987, but neither has the candidate gained the support of any senators sitting on the fence.
With no bombshells dropped through day two of the weeklong confirmation hearing, Democrats who voted against Chief Justice John Roberts in September appear equally dissatisfied with Alito, while Republicans so far seem ready to support the nominee
Fox News
To: All
To: All
Alito Pleases His Republican Backers
"Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito is carefully weaving his way through Senate confirmation hearings, saying enough to please his Republican backers while trying not to give Democratic critics any new material to use against his high court nomination."
Yahoo News
To: dubyaismypresident
I am suprised as to how each dissented. IOW I figured Thomas for the libertarian one, not Scalia. And Thomas and Scalia joined in a common dissent in Rasul v. Bush, 542 US 466 (2004).
Even though there are only a handful of cases (Hamdi, Hamdan, Rasul, Padilla), I still haven't wrapped my brain around the specific issues each case addressed, and which issues are left rather unsettled. I take Rasul as a narrow finding of habeas corpus jurisdiction (under 28 USC 2241) of US Article III Courts over 1) alien prisoners, 2) held at Gitmo. Scalia & Thomas (& Rhenquist) dissenting said "no, and it's up to Congress to adjust 2241." It is the Rasul case that provoked Lindsey Graham's introduction of S.AMND.2516 - modified to S.AMND.2524, on November 14, 2005.
A good number of FReepers howled in derision at Graham's audacity! LOL.
To: MNJohnnie
Graham can rehabilitate himself with the base by marrying Laura Ingraham
2,987
posted on
01/11/2006 4:58:01 AM PST
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
To: Cboldt
Thanks for the info. It's a lot. I hope to get a chance to look over all of it, sometime.
2,988
posted on
01/11/2006 5:11:31 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(Pround member and founder of Alitists for Alito)
2,989
posted on
01/11/2006 5:39:03 AM PST
by
meema
(I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
To: saveliberty
totally agree, saveliberty, totally agree.
2,990
posted on
01/11/2006 6:37:01 AM PST
by
N. Beaujon
(http://www.nbeaujon.com)
To: amdgmary
To: N. Beaujon
2,992
posted on
01/11/2006 6:44:46 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
To: Cboldt
Thanks for the information. I agree Judge Alito has responded well. I got a chuckle over his "That's a way of buying 30 seconds" response. One needs a little time to figure out what Lindsey is trying to get at.
2,993
posted on
01/11/2006 7:03:01 AM PST
by
rwa265
(The Promises of the Lord, I Will Proclaim Forever)
To: FreeReign
The Tenth Amendment? Oh I get it, your talking astronomy. That explains everything.
To: Flavius Josephus
2,995
posted on
01/11/2006 7:29:02 AM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Maturity has brought me the wisdom to realize just what a world class dumb ass I really am.)
To: Cboldt
What ever reigns in their arrogance and makes them answerable to someone or one's who have authority over them.
2,996
posted on
01/11/2006 7:35:13 AM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Maturity has brought me the wisdom to realize just what a world class dumb ass I really am.)
To: ken5050
2,997
posted on
01/11/2006 8:33:37 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all our troops at home and abroad!!)
To: saveliberty
I thought Chuckie Schmuckie didn't believe in torture?
To: HonestConservative
Except for R's. Not for murderers, thieves, rapists, terrorists or the Clintons. But I repeat myself
2,999
posted on
01/11/2006 2:11:44 PM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
To: Prokopton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,921-2,940, 2,941-2,960, 2,961-2,980, 2,981-3,000 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson