Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
I feel sorry for them.

There is nothing to feel sorry about. We make choices in life. I chose to minimize the risk having my children/house/freedom taken away by a woman who believes money is more important than family. AGAIN!! I made a poor choice when I proposed to my first wife. If I decide to get married again I will do everything I can to minimize making the same mistake.

If as you state men looking overseas for wives are seeking a vagina with a vacuum then you have a demonstrated low opinion of the stay at home mom/housewife. You just made many enemies on FR.

406 posted on 01/11/2006 9:26:31 AM PST by GreenOgre (mohammed is the false prophet of a false god.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]


To: GreenOgre

On the contrary, I think they'd agree with me on what you're looking for, and they want no part of it. Hence your search overseas. :~D

Look - maybe you're a nice guy who uses this forum to 'vent' as FF says. But something tells me you've got some serious garbage in your head.

Women are just people GreenOgre. As varied as men are.


409 posted on 01/11/2006 9:47:49 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

To: GreenOgre
"If as you state men looking overseas for wives are seeking a vagina with a vacuum then you have a demonstrated low opinion of the stay at home mom/housewife. You just made many enemies on FR."

NO, Hair's comment was about men seeking overseas wives. Unless (and apparently in your own mind) overseas housewives=stay-at-home moms.

There are still millions upon millions of stay-at-home moms in America. In fact MOST of the women in my very large extended family and most of the women I grew up with are stay-at-home moms. And there are many stay-at-home moms on this forum as well as many women here who would like to be. I applaud them.

If you don't see it, you are blind.

452 posted on 01/11/2006 11:54:48 AM PST by TAdams8591 (The first amendment does NOT protect vulgar and obscene speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson