Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush forces Hamas down Israel’s throat in Jerusalem. Olmert government is stunned
DEBKAfile Exclusive ^ | January 9, 2006, 11:53 PM (GMT+02:00)

Posted on 01/09/2006 7:46:28 PM PST by strategofr

Sunday night Jan 8, US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice discussed the forthcoming Palestinian elections to the legislative council on the telephone with Palestinian Authority chairman Abu Mazen.

Jerusalem was not briefed, DEBKAfile’s political sources report.

Twelve hours later, the US consul in Jerusalem Jacob Walles visited Abu Mazen’s office in Ramallah with an oral message from President George W. Bush. According to our sources, it was a presidential guarantee that all the Palestinian parties running for election on Jan 25 would be allowed to campaign openly in East Jerusalem, eligible voters in the city would be permitted to cast their votes through local post offices, and the voter slips of all Palestinian parties without exception would be available in the balloting booths.

The Israeli government was not informed of the extraordinary step taken by Bush over its head and in respect of Israeli sovereign territory.

The step has some disturbing implications:

1. The Bush administration took advantage of Ehud Olmert’s having been less than a week in the job of acting prime minister and treated his reluctance to undertake firm decisions - as long as prime minister Ariel Sharon’s condition was uncertain -as a leadership vacuum in Jerusalem. Without a word, administration officials marked down the goings-on around Hadassah hospital in Jerusalem and Olmert’s slowness to rise to the challenge.

3. Olmert’s failure to come down decisively on the Jerusalem issue has a serious consequence: Washington’s intercession enables the terrorist Hamas group to fly its green flags and hold rallies on Temple Mount with its standard calls for jihad against Israel, as well as piling its voter slips at Israeli government post offices as an option for the Palestinian voter. By this device, the backhanded recognition of a Palestinian terrorist organization sworn to destroy the Jewish state has been thrust down the interim government’s throat.

4. The Bush administration showed no consideration for Olmert’s efforts to find his feet as head of government, bid for the leadership of Kadima party and fight a tough election.

Governing circles in Jerusalem were stunned by the White House action. They asked if Bush wanted Binyamin Netanyahu and Likud to win the March election having awarded him the edge on the Jerusalem issue. Part of the shock derived from the Israeli ministers’ mistaken conviction that Abu Mazen would postpone the election to prevent the Hamas beating his ruling Fatah. DEBKAfile’s sources repeatedly reported that the White House would insist on the Palestinian vote taking place on schedule – even at the price of a Hamas win and regardless of Sharon’s indisposition and a transitional administration very much at sea in Jerusalem.

There are still hopes in Israeli government circles that the two US officials David

Welch and Elliot Abrams due this week will help moderate some of the particulars of the Bush pledge to the Palestinian leader. But the chances of this are slim.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: elliotabrams; hamas; israel; palestinians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last
To: strategofr

It became a cold war issue post 67, and particularly into the 70s. And of course after "peace" with Egypt, an obligation to maintain Israeli military superiority in recognition of the tactical disadvantage of returning the Sinai. For the second time. The first time around Eisenhower pledged to maintain Israel's free access to the Red Sea through the Straits of Tiran. LBJ reniged on that pledge when Egypt expelled the UN force from the Sinai, began moving in troops, and blockaded the Straits in May, 1967, leading to the 1967 war. One can only speculate what would have happened had LBJ and the UN stood up to Egypt.


101 posted on 01/10/2006 11:50:07 AM PST by SJackson (Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants to see us happy. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: littleleaguemom

The quote is mine. And it comes from basic research. The term "Palestinian" was not in wide-spread use until after '48. Palestine is frequently referenced throughout history but I believe some of the earliest inhabitants of Palestine were the Hebrew/Jewish people.


103 posted on 01/10/2006 12:03:43 PM PST by unionblue83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: sofaman

Bush is wrong, have the stones to say so. That doesn't qualify as "Bush-bashing" or "anti-American".

---Bush may be wrong, but he is not an appeaser of terrorists, and
that is the undercurrent I sense in many of the Middle East threads on FR..it is Bush-bashing to consider him such and it is anti-American to imply that the US doesn't care about the security of an ally.


104 posted on 01/10/2006 12:06:10 PM PST by Bushbacker (f----u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: unionblue83
No, the first residents were the Canaanites and are constantly referenced in the Hebrew Bible. The town of Jericho, believed to be the oldest in the world, had already been inhabited for 7000 years when Joshua first saw it from Mount Nebo. The Hebrews came in from the desert around the same time the Philistines (Phoenicians) arrived from the sea and mostly settled the coastal areas while the Hebrews were mostly in the hill country. Even Jerusalem predates both the Hebrews and Philistines. At the time of Christ, many Jews became Christians and their ancestors continued to live in what is now Israel/West Bank until the present. Many later converted to Islam and also continued to live in the area. As you undoubtedly know, the Jews who did not convert mostly were dispersed in the disapora after the final defeat by Rome and destruction of the Temple.

Late in the nineteenth century when Zionist Jews started returning to what the Romans had named Palestine (rather as an insult to the Jews in that it is based on Philistine), it was still populated with many Christians and Muslims who are the Semitic descendants of Jews, Canaanites, Philistines, Turks and various others who had passed through.

105 posted on 01/10/2006 12:19:21 PM PST by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker
You sense an undefcurrent of Bush-bashing. That's convenient, but not accurate. I see people taking issue with our policy. I have NOT seen people saying that Bush is a "terrorist appeaser"..I haven't even seen people implying that. And if anyone implied that, they would be wrong, imho.

Neither have I seen anyone indicate that we don't care about the securtity of an ally. I HAVE seen that many people are upset that we are not supporting our ally. And I would agree with that. Equating that with un-Americanism is convenient, but silly.

106 posted on 01/10/2006 1:17:58 PM PST by sofaman ("We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail."-Pres George W. Bush, Sept 20, 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

"My biggest problem is that I am an angry white male who has a tendency to shoot my mouth off. I'm Archie Bunkers long lost son.:P"

LOL! That's cool.


107 posted on 01/10/2006 1:27:46 PM PST by strategofr (Taliban had such quick success because of US State Dept support, Dangerous Diplomacy, Mowbray, p. 63)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

"The story in #19."

If you read carefully between the lines, I think you can see that the article is probably a "government sanitized" version of the DEbKa-described events. The Israeli government is not going to announce that the US just bitch-slapped them.


108 posted on 01/10/2006 1:30:47 PM PST by strategofr (Taliban had such quick success because of US State Dept support, Dangerous Diplomacy, Mowbray, p. 63)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: strategofr
No not quite. The Debka story made a big point that Hamas would be able to campaign. That is/was a blatant lie!

Debka: Washington’s intercession enables the terrorist Hamas group to fly its green flags and hold rallies on Temple Mount with its standard calls for jihad against Israel, as well as piling its voter slips at Israeli government post offices as an option for the Palestinian voter. By this device, the backhanded recognition of a Palestinian terrorist organization sworn to destroy the Jewish state has been thrust down the interim government’s throat.

The Truth: "Extremist organizations working against peace will not be permitted to campaign. Fatah will be allowed to campaign, but not Hamas."

109 posted on 01/10/2006 2:27:45 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: strategofr; PhilDragoo
This is a riot!

Egypt and Jordan recognize Israels right to exist.
Both micro manage continued *Badal [Revenge] on Israel.
Egypt..[Cough]....over 100 tunnels...weapons are pouring into Gaza.
West Bank is not Gaza....different clans and ties.
Their goodies come in thru Jordanian intrigues.

Not a chance Saudi's are anywhere in all of this [rolling eye's]

The dinner bell rings for Jersualem...the salivating contuinues.

Bush Senior said openly...."New world order"

Of course.....Jerusalem has nothing to do with new world order.[sarcasm]

Order up....

"Jerusalem,Jerusalem,.....cheeseburger.....Pepsi,Pepsi" : )

110 posted on 01/10/2006 2:49:09 PM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: strategofr
Another voice in support of DebKa! Yaaaa!!!

LOL  Debka is sometimes inaccurate/ they get feeds from intelligence buddies of theirs who have an agenda/ but this one has the ring of truth

111 posted on 01/10/2006 3:38:10 PM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed

Happy nuevo Christopher Isherwood new year


112 posted on 01/10/2006 3:39:24 PM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver

The president is right.

Remember he's the president.


113 posted on 01/10/2006 5:04:56 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

Mythology and fairy tales.

And people still fall for this nonsense and then they ask: "What happened?" "Why did it happen?"


114 posted on 01/10/2006 5:08:01 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda

Well were going to find out how mythological the Bible is in a relatively short time...where does it put you if this turns out to be the truth?


115 posted on 01/10/2006 5:58:57 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"The Bush Administration's contempt for Israel is staggering."

[ Not that you would have an agenda or anything......... ]

Err, you supported Harriet Miers, if I remember correctly. Your robotics is showing.
116 posted on 01/10/2006 6:49:32 PM PST by jdm (WWW-WEBMASTER (My grandfather swears it's his email address))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Err, you supported Harriet Miers, if I remember correctly. Your robotics is showing.

As is your ability to throw out liberal cliches.

117 posted on 01/10/2006 6:52:28 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed; strategofr; Alouette
The Bush-Rice bullying of Israel would have me grinding my teeth if I didn't think the pair will have to drink the soup they've been spitting in for so long.

The Palis of every flavor, Hamas, Fatah, Yomama, etcetera have not renounced their goal of Israel's destruction but annealed in it thanks to our leaders' tacit approval.

Saudis use our leaders as dogs to clean scraps under their table.

Surely if Netanyahu looks like a serious contender some U.S. shill a la Carville will be dispatched to smear him with a typically tawdry scandal--or a convenient stroke.

Let us not talk falsely now; the hour is getting late.

118 posted on 01/10/2006 6:57:03 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

"No not quite. The Debka story made a big point that Hamas would be able to campaign. That is/was a blatant lie!"

Not necessarily a lie. I see what you mean: the stories are different. But the Debka story had more accuracy than inaccuracy. And it may be that the original US formulation included a right for Hamas to campaign---something the Israelis were able to modify through negotiation.

Either you lack an understanding of how breaking news stories can have inaccuracies or change (and thus you display a curious mix of intelligence and stupidity) or you are being deliberately provacative.


119 posted on 01/10/2006 7:06:15 PM PST by strategofr (Taliban had such quick success because of US State Dept support, Dangerous Diplomacy, Mowbray, p. 63)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

"they get feeds from intelligence buddies of theirs who have an agenda"

I realize this would be bound to happen. They must be dependent on the Mossad for much of their material. But I figure: 1) they analyze to counter that as best they can, 2)lying too much would be counterproductive for the Mossad here, and 3)you can sort of tell which stories come from the Mossad anyway. If category (3)has some inaccuracy, it is nonetheless entertaining.

Besides, do we think the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Times never get fed anything by the CIA?


120 posted on 01/10/2006 7:11:37 PM PST by strategofr (Taliban had such quick success because of US State Dept support, Dangerous Diplomacy, Mowbray, p. 63)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson