Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Quiet' Mach 6 wind tunnel at Purdue helps shape future aircraft
Perdue University Website ^ | 1-5-2006 | Emil Venere

Posted on 01/09/2006 7:57:05 AM PST by TChris

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. – Purdue University engineers have developed a wind tunnel that is the only one of its kind in the world capable of running quietly at "hypersonic" speeds, helping researchers to design advanced aircraft and missiles.

No other wind tunnel runs quietly while conducting experiments in airstreams traveling at Mach 6 – six times the speed of sound, said Steven Schneider, an aerospace engineer and professor in Purdue's School of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Researchers will use the $1 million wind tunnel to help design advanced aircraft that travel at hypersonic speeds, or faster than Mach 5, which is about 4,000 miles per hour at sea level.

Purdue engineers will present a paper about the wind tunnel on Thursday (Jan. 12) during the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics' Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit in Reno, Nev. The paper was written by Schneider and graduate research assistants Matthew P. Borg and Thomas J. Juliano.

A team of Purdue engineers led by Schneider finished assembling the wind tunnel in 2001.

"After four years of debugging, recent tests have shown that it does, indeed, run quietly at Mach 6," Schneider said. "The wind tunnel airflow has about one-tenth to one-thirtieth of the noise in other high-speed wind tunnels."

The quiet operation is critical for recreating the smooth, or laminar, flow of air over the surfaces of aircraft, spacecraft or missiles re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. Data from tests with models studied in the wind tunnel will lead to a better understanding of when and how the air flowing over a surface changes from smooth to turbulent. Engineers must better understand this transition from smooth to turbulent flow if they are to design improved aircraft and missiles. One aim is to design aircraft that heat up less from atmospheric friction as they re-enter the atmosphere.

"Laminar airflows can have eight times less heating than turbulent ones," Schneider said.

Designs that heat up less would require less shielding, enabling engineers to build lighter-weight, lower-cost vehicles.

"Designers are considering a new re-entry vehicle with a metal skin," Schneider said. "This would eliminate the tile system used on the space shuttle, which is expensive to maintain."

Another major application will be to design a generation of aircraft that will use "scramjets" to travel more than 7,000 mph, allowing them to leave the atmosphere and fly halfway around the world in a few hours.

A future fleet of space planes using scramjets might be far less expensive to operate than the current space shuttles, making it more affordable to haul payloads into orbit. Unlike rockets, which must carry their own supply of liquid oxygen to combust fuel, scramjets would scoop oxygen out of the atmosphere.

For scramjets to work properly, however, a steady, smooth flowing supply of air must be moving continuously at hypersonic speeds into the engine's combustion chamber. Poor control of turbulence near the aircraft's surface might disrupt this crucial air supply, and turbulent flow over the front of the vehicle would cause excessive heating.

Engineers need high-quality data to predict how well certain scramjet designs would function, Schneider said.

"A quiet wind tunnel more closely simulates flight," he said.

Wind tunnel research also may help engineers design more accurate missiles because the effects of excessive heating can nudge missiles off course.

Quiet wind tunnel operation requires laminar flow on the walls of a tunnel segment called the nozzle. Turbulent flow in this segment radiates noise onto the test model, interfering with experiments. Sometimes, however, turbulence does occur in the nozzle, and the researchers study the transition from laminar to turbulence to better understand how to prevent it and also to watch its effects on the model.

Researchers will use the wind tunnel to study how the transition from smooth to turbulent airflow affects the current space shuttle's heat-resistant tiles as the spacecraft re-enters the atmosphere.

The quiet Mach 6 wind tunnel is not the first of its kind. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration previously operated a wind tunnel capable of similar performance, but that wind tunnel is not currently in operation.

The tunnel is relatively inexpensive to operate because each "run" is only about eight seconds. First, air is pumped out of a large tank that is connected to one end of the wind tunnel, creating a vacuum inside the tank. Then a valve is opened between the tank and the wind tunnel, sucking a burst of air through the wind tunnel at high velocity. The short run time requires less expensive equipment, unlike the large compressors needed for other wind tunnels that pump air continuously.

Modern computer technology and sensors have made the low-cost wind tunnel possible, Schneider said.

"Thirty years ago eight seconds of data would have been useless because you couldn't measure anything in such a short time," he said. "But nowadays, with all the computers and electronics and sensors, you can collect an enormous amount of data in eight seconds."

To obtain quiet flow, the throat of the Mach 6 nozzle must be polished to a near-perfect mirror finish, eliminating roughness that will trip the flow near the wall from laminar to turbulent. Then, for the wind tunnel to remain quiet, it must be entirely free of particles. Even a single piece of sand could cause turbulence inside the wind tunnel, damaging the finish and ruining the quiet effect.

To help ensure this ultra-clean condition, engineers enlisted the help of an undergraduate student who is a spelunker. The slender student crawled through a 120-foot section of the wind tunnel, wearing a suit like those worn by technicians in clean rooms, and wiped down the inside of the stainless-steel pipe. The pipe is only 18 inches in diameter.

"It's pretty tight quarters," Schneider said. "If you are claustrophobic, this would not be the right job for you."

The wind tunnel, which has been funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization and the Boeing Co., is named the Boeing/AFOSR Mach 6 Quiet Tunnel.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: aeronautics; defense; science; tech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/09/2006 7:57:08 AM PST by TChris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TChris
To help ensure this ultra-clean condition, engineers enlisted the help of an undergraduate student who is a spelunker. The slender student crawled through a 120-foot section of the wind tunnel, wearing a suit like those worn by technicians in clean rooms, and wiped down the inside of the stainless-steel pipe. The pipe is only 18 inches in diameter.

This kid deserves a medal! I get sick just thinking about it!

2 posted on 01/09/2006 8:18:47 AM PST by Paradox (Time to sharpen ole Occam's Razor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
The slender student crawled through a 120-foot section of the wind tunnel, wearing a suit like those worn by technicians in clean rooms


3 posted on 01/09/2006 8:23:23 AM PST by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

This story 'blows'.


4 posted on 01/09/2006 8:35:19 AM PST by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zot

Purdue ping


5 posted on 01/09/2006 8:51:07 AM PST by GreyFriar ((3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

I wonder how big the test section is?


6 posted on 01/09/2006 10:24:47 AM PST by Texas Patriot (Remember.... The Alamo, never forget HOORAHH!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YouPosting2Me
This story 'blows'.

Actually it sucks

7 posted on 01/09/2006 10:38:18 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: YouPosting2Me

Didn't you read the story?

This thing doesn't 'blow'....

it actually 'sucks'!


8 posted on 01/09/2006 10:42:55 AM PST by NorthernTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TChris
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/05/040512044455.htm

Mimicking Humpback Whale Flippers May Improve Airplane Wing Design

DURHAM, N.C. -- Wind tunnel tests of scale-model humpback whale flippers have revealed that the scalloped, bumpy flipper is a more efficient wing design than is currently used by the aeronautics industry on airplanes. The tests show that bump-ridged flippers do not stall as quickly and produce more lift and less drag than comparably sized sleek flippers.

.....

The sleek flipper performance was similar to a typical airplane wing. But the tubercle flipper exhibited nearly 8 percent better lift properties, and withstood stall at a 40 percent steeper wind angle. The team was particularly surprised to discover that the flipper with tubercles produced as much as 32 percent lower drag than the sleek flipper.

see full article

9 posted on 01/09/2006 12:27:13 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration previously operated a wind tunnel capable of similar performance, but that wind tunnel is not currently in operation.

A long time ago I worked across the street from a superheated helium blowdown tunnel that operated in that range. It exploded one night, throwing extremely hot ceramic "eggs" all over the facility (NASA Ames), setting shrubs afire for blocks around.

10 posted on 01/09/2006 12:45:57 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Libs: Celebrate MY diversity! | Iran Azadi 2006 | Is it February yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fnord; phantomworker; sd-joe; Jack Black; TXBSAFH; SouthernBoyupNorth; Ichneumon; ...

Geezer Geek ping.

This is a very low-volume ping list (typically days to weeks between pings).
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this list.

11 posted on 01/09/2006 12:46:27 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Libs: Celebrate MY diversity! | Iran Azadi 2006 | Is it February yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
A long time ago I worked across the street from a superheated helium blowdown tunnel that operated in that range. It exploded one night, throwing extremely hot ceramic "eggs" all over the facility (NASA Ames), setting shrubs afire for blocks around.

An eggsasperating situation for the engineers, I'm sure.

12 posted on 01/09/2006 12:49:11 PM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TChris
The tunnel is relatively inexpensive to operate because each "run" is only about eight seconds. First, air is pumped out of a large tank that is connected to one end of the wind tunnel, creating a vacuum inside the tank. Then a valve is opened between the tank and the wind tunnel, sucking a burst of air through the wind tunnel at high velocity.

The exact method the Nazis used to design the V-2...

13 posted on 01/09/2006 12:56:13 PM PST by null and void (The lesson of the holocaust: if someone says they are going to kill you, pay attention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

There's also a wind tunnel at the U. Washington where they were "secretly" testing the Sonic Cruiser a while ago.


14 posted on 01/09/2006 12:57:55 PM PST by phantomworker ("Compared to what we ought to be, we are only half awake..." --William James)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
Interesting.

The only wind testing I've been directly involved with had been with high rise building and monumental skylight mock-ups, at much, much lower velocities though...;>)

Nontheless impressive when done with water spray.

And while we spec'd the wind tunnel tests of city area models to establish possible wind loads beyond code requirements, I never go the chance to actuall view the tests...damn!

15 posted on 01/09/2006 1:05:44 PM PST by Covenantor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

My daughter is a Purdue student.
It is a great university.
I AM AN AMERICAN
http://www.purdue.edu/BANDS/aamb/iamanamericanbg.html


16 posted on 01/09/2006 1:09:44 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Physical mock ups are outstanding. But in today's world any new design patterns that are developed from it will be computerized for profit before the first design is prototyped. New info concerning that pesky wind problem associated with movement is a good thing.

BUT....Being that I gave up flying when I started making aircraft structural components, I've become steadfast in the belief that if you can't "beam" me from here to there, I ain't going!!! :-)


17 posted on 01/09/2006 1:31:53 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; RightWhale; KevinDavis
The problem they're dealing with is only being addressed in the latter two thirds of the air-flow; -- at the wing edges and engine nacelles, and in the aftermath of the engine and control surface operations.

They will not be able to properly construct their laminar flow-through until they learn to prepare the air before the plane's arrival, for its smooth passage.

If we were speaking of a super-high-speed iceboat, the concept would be obvious. "Ah, yes, we need to heat the ice before the cutting runners arrive, in order to achieve the speed we want."

Exactly. For laminar flow at mach-plus speed, the air has to be pre-heated by lasers focusing at variable distances in front of the craft.

To control it properly, a plane-and-engine-specific pattern will have to be imposed sequentially in front of the plane, so that the air is already expecting it, just as a celebrity can (sometimes) pass unhindered through a thronging crowd.

As far as I know, this idea first saw daylight in my published Science Fiction book of 2004.

18 posted on 01/09/2006 2:14:25 PM PST by NicknamedBob (How can I compete in a world of Cat 5 and wireless when my brain is wired by knob and tube?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

The Russian supersonic torpedo must be doing something like this.


19 posted on 01/09/2006 2:18:39 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

In water, one would need to either superheat the water ahead, or inject a tight column of compressed gas like a drill bit.


20 posted on 01/09/2006 2:22:24 PM PST by NicknamedBob (How can I compete in a world of Cat 5 and wireless when my brain is wired by knob and tube?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson